Rasch analysis of the Western Ontario McMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index: results from community and arthroplasty samples

被引:46
作者
Davis, AM
Badley, EM
Beaton, DE
Kopec, J
Wright, JG
Young, NL
Williams, JI
机构
[1] Toronto Rehabil Inst, Program Clin Epidemiol & Hlth Serv Res, Grad Dept Rehabil Sci & Hlth Policy, Dept Phys Therapy, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll, Hlth Sci Ctr, Inst Clin & Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Toronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg & Populat Hlth Sci,Hosp Sick Children, Program Clin Epidemiol & Hlth Serv Res, Grad Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Dept Hlth Care & Epidemiol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L7, Canada
[6] Univ British Columbia, Arthrit Res Ctr, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L7, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp,Dept Occupat Therapy,Program Cli, Inst Work & Hlth Mobil Program & Clin Res, Grad Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[8] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Grad Dept Publ Hlth Sci,Toronto Western Res Inst, Arthrit Community Res & Evaluat Unit, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[9] Univ Toronto, Hosp Sick Children,Grad Dept Rehabil Sci, Community Hlth Syst Resource Grp, Program Clin Epidemiol & Hlth Serv Res, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[10] Univ Toronto, Hosp Sick Children, Community Hlth Syst Resource Grp,Dept Pediat, Program Clin Epidemiol & Hlth Serv Res, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[11] Univ Toronto, Hosp Sick Children,Dept Phys Therapy, Community Hlth Syst Resource Grp, Program Clin Epidemiol & Hlth Serv Res, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
WOMAC; Rasch analysis; longitudinal data; joint arthroplasty; arthritis; outcome measurement;
D O I
10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00179-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objective: This study is based on secondary analysis of Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) data from a community sample over 55 years and total hip or knee arthroplasty samples presurgery and 1-year postoperative. Methods: The WOMAC data were evaluated by Rasch analysis. Data were considered to fit the Rasch mathematical model for the pain and physical dimensions of the WOMAC if unidimensionality was confirmed by principle component analysis of the subscale and the residuals from the Rasch analysis, infit and outfit statistics were in the range of 0.80 to 1.20; if there was no differential item functioning based on gender or hip vs. knee subjects; and, if there was stability of the item logits across the three data samples. Results: A three-item pain dimension (excluding night pain and pain on standing) and a 14-item physical dimension (excluding heavy domestic duties, getting in and out of the bath and getting on and off the toilet) fit the Rasch model based on these criteria. Conclusion: In evaluating existing health status questionnaires using Rasch methodology, it is important to evaluate relevant patient samples and longitudinal data when the measure is intended to evaluate change in status. By these criteria, a modified WOMAC questionnaire fits the Rasch model and has interval-level scaling properties. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1076 / 1083
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Andiel C., 1995, CAN J REHABIL, V9, P17
[2]  
ANDRICH D, 1988, RASCH MODELS MEASURE, P95
[3]  
[Anonymous], WOMAC OSTEOARTHRITIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, SPSS
[5]  
BELLAMY N, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P1833
[6]  
Bellamy N., 1988, J ORTHOP RHEUMATOL, V1, P95
[7]  
BOMBARDIER C, 1995, MED CARE, V33, P131
[8]   EVALUATION OF THE MOS SF-36 PHYSICAL FUNCTIONING SCALE (PF-10) .1. UNIDIMENSIONALITY AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE RASCH ITEM SCALE [J].
HALEY, SM ;
MCHORNEY, CA ;
WARE, JE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 47 (06) :671-684
[9]  
HAWKER G, 1995, J RHEUMATOL, V22, P1193
[10]   Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty [J].
Hawker, GA ;
Wright, JG ;
Coyte, PC ;
Williams, JI ;
Harvey, B ;
Glazier, R ;
Badley, EM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (14) :1016-1022