Will the tradable green certifications and renewable portfolio standard policy work well in China: A recursive CGE analysis

被引:9
作者
Li, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Liguo [1 ]
Zhang, Shu [1 ]
Zhang, Hongzhi [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, 619 Yonghua St, Baoding 071003, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab New Energy & Low Carbon Dev, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Elect Power Design Inst Co LTD, Technol Econ Ctr, 310 Chongqing South Rd, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
FEED-IN TARIFF; EMISSION TRADING SCHEME; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; DISTRIBUTED-GENERATION; ENERGY DEVELOPMENT; POWER INDUSTRY; THERMAL POWER; CARBON TAX; IMPACTS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1063/1.5019756
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Massive carbon emissions and environmental pollution from electric power industries make China accelerate the promotion of renewable energy power. Since then, Tradable Green Certifications (TGCs) and Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) systems have been adopted as a main energy policy to deepen the current power sector reform. A recursive computable general equilibrium model will be constructed to explore the impacts of TGC and RPS policies under 4 scenarios. The simulation results show that the implementation of TGC and RPS policies will reduce 1.12 Bt-CO2 emissions and 1040.31 Mtce energy consumptions at most in 2030. Moreover, the TGC and RPS policies will help to rebuild a sustainable economic structure by the limitation of fossil energy consumption and output; especially in coal and oil industries, the spread of TGC and RPS makes renewable energy electricity become fungible for other energy generation. Nevertheless, this policy will also cause a lot of economic loss in gross domestic product through the huge deterioration of fossil energy-related industries, which will be expressed in the dramatic decline of output, consumption, and import and export trade. Additionally, we discover that the RPS level will have a significant influence on TGC prices: the higher the RPS level, the more the expensive TGC price. Overall speaking, the RPS level of 30% would be a better choice for the balance between the development of renewable energy and the negative impact on macroeconomics. It is recommended that the implementation of the TGC and RPS level should be with other economic policies to reduce the negative effects. (C) 2018 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 67 条
[51]   A market for renewable energy credits in the Indian power sector [J].
Singh, Anoop .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (03) :643-652
[52]   Some problems in storing renewable energy [J].
Trainer, Ted .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 110 :386-393
[53]   Impacts of a common green certificate market on electricity and CO2-emission markets in the Nordic countries [J].
Unger, T ;
Ahgren, EO .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (16) :2152-2163
[54]   Prospects, Politics, and Practices of Solar Energy Innovation in China [J].
Urban, Frauke ;
Wang, Yu ;
Geall, Sam .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT & DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 27 (01) :74-98
[55]  
Varian R. H., 2006, INTERMEDIATE MICROEC
[56]   Eco-efficiency measurement of coal-fired power plants in China using super efficiency data envelopment analysis [J].
Wu, Yunna ;
Ke, Yiming ;
Xu, Chuanbo ;
Xiao, Xinli ;
Hu, Yong .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2018, 36 :157-168
[57]  
Xin D, 2017, IND SCI TRIB, V16, P85
[58]   The policy effects of feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard: A case study of China's waste incineration power industry [J].
Xin-gang, Zhao ;
Yu-zhuo, Zhang ;
Ling-zhi, Ren ;
Yi, Zuo ;
Zhi-gong, Wu .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 68 :711-723
[59]  
Xu Q., 2017, CHINA POWER ENTERP M, V25, P22
[60]   Problems and Adjustments of Renewable Energy Legislation in China [J].
Yang, Weidong .
JOURNAL OF EAST ASIA AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2017, 10 (02) :339-355