Will the tradable green certifications and renewable portfolio standard policy work well in China: A recursive CGE analysis

被引:9
作者
Li, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Liguo [1 ]
Zhang, Shu [1 ]
Zhang, Hongzhi [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, 619 Yonghua St, Baoding 071003, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab New Energy & Low Carbon Dev, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Elect Power Design Inst Co LTD, Technol Econ Ctr, 310 Chongqing South Rd, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
FEED-IN TARIFF; EMISSION TRADING SCHEME; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; DISTRIBUTED-GENERATION; ENERGY DEVELOPMENT; POWER INDUSTRY; THERMAL POWER; CARBON TAX; IMPACTS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1063/1.5019756
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Massive carbon emissions and environmental pollution from electric power industries make China accelerate the promotion of renewable energy power. Since then, Tradable Green Certifications (TGCs) and Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) systems have been adopted as a main energy policy to deepen the current power sector reform. A recursive computable general equilibrium model will be constructed to explore the impacts of TGC and RPS policies under 4 scenarios. The simulation results show that the implementation of TGC and RPS policies will reduce 1.12 Bt-CO2 emissions and 1040.31 Mtce energy consumptions at most in 2030. Moreover, the TGC and RPS policies will help to rebuild a sustainable economic structure by the limitation of fossil energy consumption and output; especially in coal and oil industries, the spread of TGC and RPS makes renewable energy electricity become fungible for other energy generation. Nevertheless, this policy will also cause a lot of economic loss in gross domestic product through the huge deterioration of fossil energy-related industries, which will be expressed in the dramatic decline of output, consumption, and import and export trade. Additionally, we discover that the RPS level will have a significant influence on TGC prices: the higher the RPS level, the more the expensive TGC price. Overall speaking, the RPS level of 30% would be a better choice for the balance between the development of renewable energy and the negative impact on macroeconomics. It is recommended that the implementation of the TGC and RPS level should be with other economic policies to reduce the negative effects. (C) 2018 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CHINA ELECT POWER YB
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CHINA FINANCIAL YB
[3]  
[Anonymous], GLOB TRENDS REN EN I
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CHIN CIT STAT YB 201
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, CHINA INPUT OUTPUT T
[6]  
ARMINGTON PS, 1969, INT MONET FUND S PAP, V16, P159
[7]   A sequential approach to integrated energy modeling in South Africa [J].
Arndt, Channing ;
Davies, Rob ;
Gabriel, Sherwin ;
Makrelov, Konstantin ;
Merven, Bruno ;
Hartley, Faaiqa ;
Thurlow, James .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 161 :591-599
[8]   A retrospective analysis of benefits and impacts of US renewable portfolio standards [J].
Barbose, Galen ;
Wiser, Ryan ;
Heeter, Jenny ;
Mai, Trieu ;
Bird, Lori ;
Bolinger, Mark ;
Carpenter, Alberta ;
Heath, Garvin ;
Keyser, David ;
Macknick, Jordan ;
Mills, Andrew ;
Millstein, Dev .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 96 :645-660
[9]   Spatial Dependence in State Renewable Policy: Effects of Renewable Portfolio Standards on Renewable Generation within NERC Regions [J].
Bowen, Eric ;
Lacombe, Donald J. .
ENERGY JOURNAL, 2017, 38 (03) :177-193
[10]   Disaggregating electricity generation technologies in CGE models: A revised technology bundle approach with an application to the US Clean Power Plan [J].
Cai, Yiyong ;
Arora, Vipin .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 154 :543-555