Personality heterogeneity in teams: Which differences make a difference for team performance?

被引:124
作者
Mohammed, S
Angell, LC
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Univ Victoria, Wellington, New Zealand
关键词
teams; groups; personality; diversity; heterogeneity;
D O I
10.1177/1046496403257228
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of personality heterogeneity on team performance. Relationships were tested from 267 business students in 59 teams working on process improvement projects sponsored by organizations. The impact of personality composition on two types of team tasks (oral vs. written) was examined. Relationships between predictors and criteria differed depending on the type of task performed. Specifically, higher variability on agreeableness and neuroticism resulted in lower oral presentation scores, whereas higher variability on extraversion resulted in higher oral presentation scores. Teams with higher mean cognitive ability scored better on written reports. The implications of these findings for the study of team performance are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 677
页数:27
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DESIGNING EFFECTIVE
[2]  
Argote L, 1993, INT REV IND ORG PSYC, V8, P333
[3]   THE BIG 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB-PERFORMANCE - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BARRICK, MR ;
MOUNT, MK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 44 (01) :1-26
[4]   Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness [J].
Barrick, MR ;
Stewart, GL ;
Neubert, MJ ;
Mount, MK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (03) :377-391
[5]   Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality [J].
Barry, B ;
Stewart, GL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 82 (01) :62-78
[6]   When member homogeneity is needed in work teams - A meta-analysis [J].
Bowers, CA ;
Pharmer, JA ;
Salas, E .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2000, 31 (03) :305-327
[7]   360° feedback:: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness [J].
Brett, JF ;
Atwater, LE .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (05) :930-942
[8]   RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS - IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS [J].
CAMPION, MA ;
MEDSKER, GJ ;
HIGGS, AC .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 46 (04) :823-850
[9]  
CANNONBOWERS JA, 1985, TEAM EFFECTIVENESS D, P333
[10]   Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models [J].
Chan, D .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (02) :234-246