Analysis of water use characteristics in industrial sectors in Beijing based on an input-output method

被引:6
|
作者
Hong, Siyang [1 ]
Wang, Hongrui [1 ]
Cheng, Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Water Sci, Beijing Key Lab Urban Hydrol Cycle & Sponge City, 19 Xinjiekou Rd, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
关键词
Beijing; industry structure adjustment; input-output method; water use coefficient; FOOTPRINT; CHINA; TRADE; NEXUS; CONSUMPTION; SCENARIOS; PROVINCE;
D O I
10.2166/ws.2019.152
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Beijing is a megalopolis with a serious water shortage that has been further exacerbated by an unreasonable industrial water structure. This article uses an input-output method to calculate the water use coefficients in each industrial sector in Beijing and analyses the water use characteristics of the various industrial sectors. Then, an industry association index that represents the influence and sensitivity of sectors is combined with the water use characteristics to readjust the industrial structure with the objectives of water conservation and sustainable economic development. The results indicate that the agricultural water use coefficient is the highest and that the coefficients are generally higher for sectors in secondary industry than for those in tertiary industry. In addition, all coefficients display a downward trend. The water use multipliers vary widely among sectors. In secondary industry during the study period, the number of high water use sectors remained stable, the number of potentially high water use sectors increased and the number of general water use sectors decreased. A comprehensive analysis of the water use characteristics and industrial structure correlations could provide a reference for the optimal allocation of water resources.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 230
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An input-output analysis of virtual water uses of the three economic sectors in Beijing
    Wang, Hongrui
    Wang, Yan
    WATER INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 34 (04) : 451 - 467
  • [2] Analysis of the relationship between water and energy in China based on a multi-regional input-output method
    Zhang, Keli
    Lu, Hongwei
    Tian, Peipei
    Guan, Yanlong
    Kang, Yu
    He, Li
    Fan, Xing
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 309
  • [3] Carbon emissions of China's industrial sectors based on input-output analysis
    Xiaohong Yu
    Miao Xu
    Yumeng Ding
    Chinese Journal of Population,Resources and Environment, 2017, 15 (02) : 147 - 156
  • [4] Local-scale systems input-output analysis of embodied water for the Beijing economy in 2007
    Han, Mengyao
    Guo, Shan
    Chen, Hui
    Ji, Xi
    Li, Jiashuo
    FRONTIERS OF EARTH SCIENCE, 2014, 8 (03) : 414 - 426
  • [5] Embodied water for urban economy: A three-scale input-output analysis for Beijing 2010
    Han, M. Y.
    Chen, G. Q.
    Mustafa, M. T.
    Hayat, T.
    Shao, Ling
    Li, J. S.
    Xia, X. H.
    Ji, Xi
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2015, 318 : 19 - 25
  • [6] Analysis of urban metabolic processes based on input-output method: model development and a case study for Beijing
    Zhang, Yan
    Liu, Hong
    Chen, Bin
    Zheng, Hongmei
    Li, Yating
    FRONTIERS OF EARTH SCIENCE, 2014, 8 (02) : 190 - 201
  • [7] An input-output table based analysis on the virtual water by sectors with the five northwest provinces in China
    Shi, Chenchen
    Zhan, Jinyan
    PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2015, 79-82 : 47 - 53
  • [8] Physical Water Use and Water Sector Activity in Environmental Input-Output Analysis
    Alabi, Oluwafisayo
    Munday, Max
    Swales, Kim
    Turner, Karen
    REVIEW OF REGIONAL STUDIES, 2019, 49 (02) : 268 - 291
  • [9] A subsystem input-output decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions in the service sectors: a case study of Beijing, China
    Yuan, Rong
    Zhao, Tao
    Xu, Jing
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 19 (06) : 2181 - 2198
  • [10] Analyses of water footprint of Beijing in an interregional input-output framework
    Zhang, Zhuoying
    Yang, Hong
    Shi, Minjun
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (12) : 2494 - 2502