Performances of Prognostic Models in Stratifying Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer Receiving First-line Chemotherapy: a Validation Study in a Chinese Cohort

被引:1
作者
Xu, Hui [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xiaopeng [3 ]
Wu, Zhijun [4 ]
Feng, Ying [1 ]
Zhang, Cheng [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Minmin [1 ]
Yang, Yahui [1 ]
Zhang, Yi [1 ]
Feng, Chong [3 ]
Ma, Tai [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Med Univ, Dept Oncol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 218 Jixi Rd, Hefei 230022, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Prov Inst Canc Prevent & Control, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Hefei Ctr Dis Prevent & Control, Dept Noncommunicable Dis & Hlth Educ, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
[4] Maanshan Municipal Peoples Hosp, Dept Oncol, Maanshan, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
Gastric cancer; Chemotherapy; Survival analysis; Validation study; MULTICENTER PHASE-III; CISPLATIN; SURVIVAL; FLUOROURACIL; DOCETAXEL; THERAPY; S-1; OXALIPLATIN; TRIAL;
D O I
10.5230/jgc.2021.21.e26
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: While several prognostic models for the stratification of death risk have been developed for patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy, they have seldom been tested in the Chinese population. This study investigated the performance of these models and identified the optimal tools for Chinese patients. Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed with metastatic or recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma who received first-line chemotherapy were eligible for inclusion in the validation cohort. Their clinical data and survival outcomes were retrieved and documented. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves were used to evaluate the predictive ability of the models. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for patients in different risk groups divided by 7 published stratification tools. Log-rank tests with pairwise comparisons were used to compare survival differences. Results: The analysis included a total of 346 patients with metastatic or recurrent disease. The median overall survival time was 11.9 months. The patients were different into different risk groups according to the prognostic stratification models, which showed variability in distinguishing mortality risk in these patients. The model proposed by Kim et al. showed relative higher predicting abilities compared to the other models, with the highest chi(2) (25.8) value in log-rank tests across subgroups, and areas under the curve values at 6, 12, and 24 months of 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.72), 0.60 (0.54-0.65), and 0.63 (0.56-0.69), respectively. Conclusions: Among existing prognostic tools, the models constructed by Kim et al., which incorporated performance status score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, and tumor differentiation, were more effective in stratifying Chinese patients with gastric cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 278
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Multicenter Phase III Comparison of Cisplatin/S-1 With Cisplatin/Infusional Fluorouracil in Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma Study: The FLAGS Trial [J].
Ajani, Jaffer A. ;
Rodriguez, Wuilbert ;
Bodoky, Gyorgy ;
Moiseyenko, Vladimir ;
Lichinitser, Mikhail ;
Gorbunova, Vera ;
Vynnychenko, Ihor ;
Garin, August ;
Lang, Istvan ;
Falcon, Silvia .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (09) :1547-1553
[2]  
Bang YJ, 2010, LANCET, V376, P1302
[3]  
Bray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI [10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.21609]
[4]   Validation of the Royal Marsden Hospital Prognostic Index in Advanced Esophagogastric Cancer Using Individual Patient Data From the REAL 2 Study [J].
Chau, Ian ;
Ashley, Sue ;
Cunningham, David .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (19) :E3-E4
[5]   Cancer Statistics in China, 2015 [J].
Chen, Wanqing ;
Zheng, Rongshou ;
Baade, Peter D. ;
Zhang, Siwei ;
Zeng, Hongmei ;
Bray, Freddie ;
Jemal, Ahmedin ;
Yu, Xue Qin ;
He, Jie .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2016, 66 (02) :115-132
[6]   Multivariate prognostic factor analysis in locally advanced and metastatic esophago-gastric cancer-pooled analysis from three multicenter, randomized, controlled trials using individual patient data [J].
Chou, I ;
Norman, AR ;
Cunningham, D ;
Waters, JS ;
Oates, J ;
Ross, PJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (12) :2395-2403
[7]   Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer [J].
Cunningham, David ;
Starling, Naureen ;
Rao, Sheela ;
Iveson, Timothy ;
Nicolson, Marianne ;
Coxon, Fareeda ;
Middleton, Gary ;
Daniel, Francis ;
Oates, Jacqueline ;
Norman, Andrew Richard .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 358 (01) :36-46
[8]   Modest overall survival improvements from 1998 to 2009 in metastatic gastric cancer patients: a population-based SEER analysis [J].
Ebinger, Sabrina M. ;
Warschkow, Rene ;
Tarantino, Ignazio ;
Schmied, Bruno M. ;
Guller, Ulrich ;
Schiesser, Marc .
GASTRIC CANCER, 2016, 19 (03) :723-734
[9]   Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III noninferiority trial [J].
Kang, Y. -K. ;
Kang, W. -K. ;
Shin, D. -B. ;
Chen, J. ;
Xiong, J. ;
Wang, J. ;
Lichinitser, M. ;
Guan, Z. ;
Khasanov, R. ;
Zheng, L. ;
Philco-Salas, M. ;
Suarez, T. ;
Santamaria, J. ;
Forster, G. ;
McCloud, P. I. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 (04) :666-673
[10]   Clinical scoring system for the prediction of survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer [J].
Kim, Jinchul ;
Hong, Jung Yong ;
Kim, Seung Tae ;
Park, Se Hoon ;
Jekal, Se Yong ;
Choi, Jong Soo ;
Chang, Dong Kyung ;
Kang, Won Ki ;
Seo, Sung Wook ;
Lee, Jeeyun .
ESMO OPEN, 2020, 5 (02)