"You Can't be Cold and Scientific": Community Views on Ethical Issues in Intellectual Disability Research

被引:28
作者
McDonald, Katherine E. [1 ,2 ]
Schwartz, Nicole M. [3 ]
Gibbons, Colleen M. [4 ]
Olick, Robert S. [5 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Publ Hlth, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[2] Syracuse Univ, Burton Blatt Inst, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[3] Syracuse Univ, Global Community Program, Child & Family Hlth, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[4] Syracuse Univ, Coll Law, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[5] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Ctr Bioeth & Humanities, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
research ethics; intellectual disability; disability rights; INFORMED-CONSENT; MEDICAL-RESEARCH; PEOPLE; CHALLENGES; ADULTS; ATTITUDES; PARTICIPATION; SCHIZOPHRENIA; COMPLEXITIES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1177/1556264615575512
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Perceptions, attitudes, and ethical concerns related to conducting research with adults with intellectual disability hinder scientific innovation to promote health. Yet we lack an understanding of community views on effective research policy and practice. To address this knowledge void, we qualitatively studied the views of adults with intellectual disability and those who provide them support regarding research participation of adults with intellectual disability. We found substantial support for their inclusion, particularly given the possibility of benefits to adults with intellectual disability, researchers, and society. We also found concerns for potential harm and differing ideas on how to promote safety. Our findings emphasize the importance of their inclusion in research, and the need for policies and practices that promote respect and safety.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 208
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   What to tell and how to tell: a qualitative study of information sharing in research for adults with intellectual disability [J].
Andre-Barron, D. ;
Strydom, A. ;
Hassiotis, A. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2008, 34 (06) :501-506
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CONV RIGHTS PERS DIS
[3]  
Becker H, 2004, MENT RETARD, V42, P471, DOI 10.1352/0047-6765(2004)42<471:RPWDAR>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? [J].
Braun, Virginia ;
Clarke, Victoria .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) :328-352
[6]   Out of sight, out of mind? The inclusion and identification of people with intellectual disability in public health research [J].
Brooker, Katie ;
van Dooren, Kate ;
Tseng, Chih-Han ;
McPherson, Lyn ;
Lennox, Nick ;
Ware, Robert .
PERSPECTIVES IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 135 (04) :204-211
[7]  
Charlton JI, 1998, Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment
[8]   Ethics and intellectual disability [J].
Clegg, J .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 12 (05) :537-541
[9]  
Department of Health Education and Welfare, 2014, J Am Coll Dent, V81, P4
[10]   Mentally disabled research subjects - The enduring policy issues [J].
Dresser, R .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (01) :67-72