Computational thinking embedded in engineering design: capturing computational thinking of children in an informal engineering design activity

被引:35
作者
Ehsan, Hoda [1 ]
Rehmat, Abeera P. [2 ]
Cardella, Monica E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Engn Educ, 701 W Stadium Ave, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Educ, 201 N Rose Ave, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Computational thinking; Engineering design; Informal learning environments; Elementary children; Science center; STUDENTS; ABSTRACTION; PLAY;
D O I
10.1007/s10798-020-09562-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Just as engineering and computational thinking have recently gained increased attention in pre-college school-based education, many museums and science centers have also designed exhibits and experiences to promote computational thinking and engineering learning. Recent reports suggest that computational and engineering thinking can empower each other, and engineering design can be an appropriate context for children's engagement in computational thinking. Previous studies have documented young children's abilities to engage in engineering thinking and other studies have collected evidence of young children's abilities to engage in computational thinking. However, there is little research that explores how children's engagement in both engineering and computational thinking can support each other. Hence, in this qualitative case study, we aimed to examine how 5 to 7-year-old children engage in computational thinking competencies in the context of a family based engineering design activity. This activity was conducted at a small science center exhibit. In our presented findings we map children's enactment of at least one CT competency to children's engagement in engineering design actions.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 464
页数:24
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, Standards for K-12 Engineering Education
  • [3] Armoni Michal, 2013, ACM Inroads, V4, P34, DOI 10.1145/2465085.2465095
  • [4] Dialogic inquiry in life science conversations of family groups in a museum
    Ash, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2003, 40 (02) : 138 - 162
  • [5] Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners
    Atman, Cynthia J.
    Adams, Robin S.
    Cardella, Monica E.
    Turns, Jennifer
    Mosborg, Susan
    Saleem, Jason
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2007, 96 (04) : 359 - 379
  • [6] *AUSTR CURR ASS RE, 2015, REP AUSTR CURR TECHN
  • [7] Bairaktarova D., 2011, Children, Youth and Environments, V21, P212, DOI DOI 10.7721/CHILYOUTENVI.21.2.0212
  • [8] Barr Valerie, 2011, ACM Inroads, V2, P48, DOI 10.1145/1929887.1929905
  • [9] BELL T, 2014, P 43 ACM TECHN S COM, P343
  • [10] BELL T, 2018, LECT NOTES COMPUTER