The Activ8 activity monitor: Validation of posture and movement classification

被引:13
作者
Horemans, Herwin [1 ]
Kooijmans, Hedwig [1 ]
van den Berg-emons, Rita [1 ]
Bussmann, Hans [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Wytemaweg 80, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION AND ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGIES ENGINEERING | 2020年 / 7卷
关键词
Accelerometry; physical activity; physical activity assessment; piezoelectric devices; rehabilitation devices; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; ENERGY-EXPENDITURE; VALIDITY; ADULTS; BEHAVIOR; DISEASE; WORN;
D O I
10.1177/2055668319890535
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Introduction: To set up and guide interventions with the aim to increase physical activity and lower sedentary behavior valid monitoring of physical behavior is essential. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of the single-unit Activ8 activity monitor to classify several body postures and movements. Methods: Twelve healthy adults performed a series of activities, representative for everyday life, according to a standard protocol. Activ8 was both worn in the trouser pocket (prescribed location) and fixated to the front of the thigh. Activities were video recorded and analyzed thereafter. Postures and movements that were analyzed were lying/sitting, standing, walking, cycling, and running. Results: The agreement between Activ8 output and video analysis was 89.7% (inter-subject range: 66.0 to 96.6%) for the pocket location and 91.9% (range 85.5 to 95.1%) for the thigh location. Sensitivity and positive predictive value scores for both locations were all above 80%, except for standing (69% or higher). Differences in classified duration of separate postures and movements were within 20% for walking, sitting and running. Conclusion: The Activ8 is a valid instrument to quantify a defined set of body postures and movements. Because of the smaller time difference, the thigh location is preferred for research purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [21] Usefulness of motion sensors to estimate energy expenditure in children and adults: a narrative review of studies using DLW
    Sardinha, L. B.
    Judice, P. B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2017, 71 (03) : 331 - 339
  • [22] Assessment of free-living physical activity in humans: An overview of currently available and proposed new measures
    Schutz, Y
    Weinsier, RL
    Hunter, GR
    [J]. OBESITY RESEARCH, 2001, 9 (06): : 368 - 379
  • [23] Evaluation of a Body-Worn Sensor System to Measure Physical Activity in Older People With Impaired Function
    Taraldsen, Kristin
    Askim, Torunn
    Sletvold, Olav
    Einarsen, Elin Kristin
    Bjastad, Karianne Gruner
    Indredavik, Bent
    Helbostad, Jorunn Laegdheim
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2011, 91 (02): : 277 - 285
  • [24] Validation of the Physical Activity Scale for Individuals With Physical Disabilities
    van den Berg-Emons, Rita J.
    L'Ortye, Annemiek A.
    Buffart, Laurien M.
    Nieuwenhuijsen, Channah
    Nooijen, Carla F.
    Bergen, Michael P.
    Stam, Henk J.
    Bussmann, Johannes B.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 92 (06): : 923 - 928
  • [25] Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence
    Warburton, DER
    Nicol, CW
    Bredin, SSD
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2006, 174 (06) : 801 - 809
  • [26] How consumer physical activity monitors could transform human physiology research
    Wright, Stephen P.
    Brown, Tyish S. Hall
    Collier, Scott R.
    Sandberg, Kathryn
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-REGULATORY INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 312 (03) : R358 - R367
  • [27] Measurement of human daily physical activity
    Zhang, K
    Werner, P
    Sun, M
    Pi-Sunyer, FX
    Boozer, CN
    [J]. OBESITY RESEARCH, 2003, 11 (01): : 33 - 40