Extensive repair of acute type A aortic dissection through a partial upper sternotomy and using complete stem-graft replacement of the arch

被引:6
作者
Xie, Xian-Biao [1 ]
Dai, Xiao-Fu [1 ]
Fang, Guan-Hua [1 ]
Qiu, Zhi-Huang [1 ]
Jiang, De-Bin [1 ]
Chen, Liang-Wan [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Union Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
partial upper sternotomy; acute type A aortic dissection; surgical repair; VALVE-REPLACEMENT; ASCENDING AORTA; MINIMAL-ACCESS; OPEN PLACEMENT; SURGERY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.10.063
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Partial upper sternotomy (mini-ER) can be used in some adult cardiac surgeries but is seldom performed in the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD). This study aimed to assess the feasibility and short-term outcomes of complete stent-graft replacement of the arch with triple-branched stent graft for AAAD through a mini-ER. Methods: From 2015 to 2018, 254 patients with AAAD underwent complete stent-graft replacement of the arch with a triple-branched stent graft. Replacement was performed with conventional full sternotomy (con-ER) in 142 patients and with mini-ER in the other 112 patients. Using propensity score matching, the clinical data were compared between loo patients in the mini-ER group and loo patients in the con-ER group. Results: After propensity score matching, there were no significant between-group differences in aortic cross-clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, or total operative time. The amount of mediastinal drainage and number of red blood cell units were significantly lower in the mini-ER group compared with the con-ER group (P < .001). The intubation time was significantly shorter in the mini-ER group (P < .001). The treatment costs were also lower in the mini-ER group (P < .001). There were no significant between-group differences in 30-day mortality (9% vs 8%; P > .99) or postoperative complications. Conclusions: This study shows that extensive repair of AAAD through a mini-ER is feasible. It was superior to con-ER in terms of blood loss, postoperative ventilation time, and treatment costs.
引用
收藏
页码:1045 / 1052
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [21] Minimally invasive valve sparing aortic root replacement (David procedure) is safe
    Shrestha, Malakh
    Krueger, Heike
    Umminger, Julia
    Koigeldiyev, Nurbol
    Beckmann, Erik
    Haverich, Axel
    Martens, Andreas
    [J]. ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 4 (02) : 148 - 153
  • [22] Minimal-access ''J'' or ''j'' sternotomy for valvular, aortic, and coronary operations or reoperations
    Svensson, LG
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1997, 64 (05) : 1501 - 1503