Electronic Evidence in Administrative Proceedings

被引:1
作者
Samonova, Viktoriia V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Customs & Finance, Dept Adm & Customs Law, UA-49047 Dnipro, Ukraine
来源
CUESTIONES POLITICAS | 2022年 / 40卷 / 73期
关键词
administrative proceedings; administrative court; electronic evidence; electronic documents; digital law;
D O I
10.46398/cuestpol.4073.41
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The study established the role of electronic evidence in the system of administrative procedures in Ukraine and in the member states of the CouncilD itrecra o f Europe. Direct observation, comparison and analysis of the content of the documents were used. The key results of the study were the peculiarities identified from the use of electronic evidence in administrative procedures among the 47 member states of the Council of Europe; established sources of creation, origin of electronic evidence to be used in administrative procedures; the resolute attitude of the European Court of Human Rights and the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe towards electronic evidence in administrative proceedings. Unlike paper documents, electronic documents require special attention to their review, search and involvement in the case. It is concluded that the study of electronic evidence should be approached from the point of view of the knowledge and skills of specialists, experts and interpreters who have the appropriate license and experience. The prospects for further investigations are establishing the importance of law enforcement agencies in the field of cybersecurity in ensuring the integrity of electronic evidence used in administrative proceedings.
引用
收藏
页码:726 / 740
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] ALIFIAN GERALDI FAUZI Muhammad, 2021, INT J BUSINESS EC LA, V24, P25
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, FUTURE LAW ETECHNOLO
  • [3] AVRAMENKO Oleksandr, 2019, EUROPEAN REFORMS B, V2, P2
  • [4] Ay O., 2020, Journal of Forensic, Legal Investigative Sciences, V6, P1, DOI DOI 10.24966/FLIS-733X/100045
  • [5] A country level analysis measuring the impact of government actions, country preparedness and socioeconomic factors on COVID-19 mortality and related health outcomes
    Chaudhry, Rabail
    Dranitsaris, George
    Mubashir, Talha
    Bartoszko, Justyna
    Riazi, Sheila
    [J]. ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2020, 25
  • [6] CHVANKIN Sergiy, 2020, KNOWLEDGE ED LAW MAN, V3, P259
  • [7] Dubey V., 2017, FORENSIC RES CRIMINO, V4, P58
  • [8] Edward EO, 2019, INT CONF ELECT COMP
  • [9] EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 2021, NEW TECHN EL DAT
  • [10] GLOBAL RIGHTS COMPLIANCE, 2017, STAND DIG EV