Detailed analysis of grid-based molecular docking: A case study of CDOCKER - A CHARMm-based MD docking algorithm

被引:1284
|
作者
Wu, GS
Robertson, DH
Brooks, CL
Vieth, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Corp Ctr, Lilly Res Labs, DC 1513, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[2] Scripps Res Inst, Dept Mol Biol, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
关键词
MD docking; grid approximations; CDOCKER; CHARMm; p value;
D O I
10.1002/jcc.10306
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The influence of various factors on the accuracy of protein-ligand docking is examined. The factors investigated include the role of a grid representation of protein-ligand interactions, the initial ligand conformation and orientation, the sampling rate of the energy hyper-surface, and the final minimization. A representative docking method is used to study these factors, namely, CDOCKER, a molecular dynamics (MD) simulated-annealing-based algorithm. A major emphasis in these studies is to compare the relative performance and accuracy of various grid-based approximations to explicit all-atom force field calculations. In these docking studies, the protein is kept rigid while the ligands are treated as fully flexible and a final minimization step is used to refine the docked poses. A docking success rate of 74% is observed when an explicit all-atom representation of the protein (full force field) is used, while a lower accuracy of 66-76% is observed for grid-based methods. All docking experiments considered a 41-member protein-ligand validation set. A significant improvement in accuracy (76 vs. 66%) for the grid-based docking is achieved if the explicit all-atom force field is used in a final minimization step to refine the docking poses. Statistical analysis shows that even lower-accuracy grid-based energy representations can be effectively used when followed with full force field minimization. The results of these grid-based protocols are statistically indistinguishable from the detailed atomic dockings and provide up to a sixfold reduction in computation time. For the test case examined here, improving the docking accuracy did not necessarily enhance the ability to estimate binding affinities using the docked structures. (C) 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1549 / 1562
页数:14
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] CIFDock: A novel CHARMM-based flexible receptor-flexible ligand docking protocol
    Vankayala, Sai L.
    Warrensford, Luke C.
    Pittman, Amanda R.
    Pollard, Benjamin C.
    Kearns, Fiona L.
    Larkin, Joseph D.
    Woodcock, H. Lee
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2022, 43 (02) : 84 - 95
  • [2] In-silico study: docking simulation and molecular dynamics of peptidomimetic fullerene-based derivatives against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro
    Saleh, Noha A.
    3 BIOTECH, 2023, 13 (06)
  • [3] In silico Identification of HDAC Inhibitors for Multiple Myeloma: A Structure-based Virtual Screening, Drug Likeness, ADMET Profiling, Molecular Docking, and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study
    Debnath, Abhijit
    Mazumder, Rupa
    Mazumder, Avijit
    Singh, Rajesh
    Srivastava, Shikha
    LETTERS IN DRUG DESIGN & DISCOVERY, 2024, 21 (05) : 961 - 978