Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation with posttreatment panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography

被引:62
作者
Bouwens, Daniel G. [1 ]
Cevidanes, Lucia [1 ]
Ludlow, John B. [2 ]
Phillips, Ceib [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Dent, Dept Diagnost Sci & Gen Dent, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
GEOMETRIC ACCURACY; DISTORTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.05.016
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: Orthodontists assess mesiodistal root angulations before, during, and after orthodontic treatment as an aid in establishing proper root position. Panoramic imaging has been useful for this purpose and is a valuable screening tool in diagnosis and planning treatment of orthodontic patients. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for imaging of the craniofacial complex creates the opportunity to evaluate 3-dimensional images compared with traditional 2-dimensional images. The purpose of this project was to compare mesiodistal root angulations by using posttreatment panoramic radiographic images and CBCT scans. Methods: Mesiodistal root angulations from panoramic images and CBCT scans of 35 orthognathic surgery patients after orthodontic treatment were compared. The panoramic images were measured by using VixWin (Gendex Dental Systems, Des Plaines, Ill), and the CBCT scans by using InvivoDental 3D (version 4.1, Anatomage, San Jose, Calif). The mesiodistal root angulation of each maxillary and mandibular tooth was measured by using the occlusal plane as the reference line. With an intercept-only linear regression for correlated data (with an unstructured covariance structure), the global test of whether the mean vector of all differences for the teeth is zero was performed separately for the 2 arches. Results: The global test for both arches was statistically significant (P<0.001), indicating an overall difference in root angulation between measurements from panoramic and CBCT images. There was no discernible pattern in the average differences between panoramic and CBCT measurements. Conclusions: The assessment of mesiodistal tooth angulation with panoramic radiography should be approached with caution and reinforced by a thorough clinical examination of the dentition. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139:126-32)
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 132
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Influence of patient head positioning on measured axial tooth inclination in panoramic radiography [J].
Hardy, Timothy C. ;
Suri, Lokesh ;
Stark, Paul .
JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2009, 36 (02) :103-110
[2]  
Kobayashi K, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P228
[3]   Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom) [J].
Lascala, C ;
Panella, J ;
Marques, MM .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2004, 33 (05) :291-294
[4]   SUITABILITY OF THE PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPH FOR ASSESSMENT OF MESIODISTAL ANGULATION OF TEETH IN THE BUCCAL SEGMENTS OF THE MANDIBLE [J].
LUCCHESI, MV ;
WOOD, RE ;
NORTJE, CJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1988, 94 (04) :303-310
[5]   Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images [J].
Ludlow, John B. ;
Laster, William Stewart ;
See, Meit ;
Bailey, L'Tanya J. ;
Garland Hershey, H. .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2007, 103 (04) :534-542
[6]   Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 cone beam CT [J].
Marmulla, R ;
Wörtche, R ;
Mühling, J ;
Hassfeld, S .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 34 (01) :28-31
[8]   DIMENSIONAL REPRODUCTION IN ROTATIONAL PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY [J].
MCDAVID, WD ;
TRONJE, G ;
WELANDER, U ;
MORRIS, CR .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1986, 62 (01) :96-101
[9]   The accuracy of 4 panoramic units in the projection of mesiodistal tooth angulations [J].
Mckee, IW ;
Williamson, PC ;
Lam, EW ;
Heo, G ;
Glover, KE ;
Major, PW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2002, 121 (02) :166-175
[10]  
Mckee IW, 2001, ANGLE ORTHOD, V71, P442