Breast cancer risk stratification for mammographic screening: A nation-wide screening cohort of 24,431 women in Singapore

被引:4
|
作者
Ho, Peh Joo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wong, Fuh Yong [4 ]
Chay, Wen Yee [5 ]
Lim, Elaine Hsuen [5 ]
Lim, Zi Lin [1 ]
Chia, Kee Seng [2 ,3 ]
Hartman, Mikael [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Li, Jingmei [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Genome Inst Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Canc Ctr Singapore, Div Radiat Oncol, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Natl Canc Ctr Singapore, Div Med Oncol, Singapore, Singapore
[6] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Surg, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2021年 / 10卷 / 22期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
breast cancer; Gail model; mammogram recall status; mammographic density; mammography screening; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; DENSITY; PARTICIPATION; INTERVENTIONS; BENEFITS; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.4297
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Breast cancer incidence is increasing in Asia. However, few women in Singapore attend routine mammography screening. We aim to identify women at high risk of breast cancer who will benefit most from regular screening using the Gail model and information from their first screen (recall status and mammographic density). Methods In 24,431 Asian women (50-69 years) who attended screening between 1994 and 1997, 117 developed breast cancer within 5 years of screening. Cox proportional hazard models were used to study the associations between risk classifiers (Gail model 5-year absolute risk, recall status, mammographic density), and breast cancer occurrence. The efficacy of risk stratification was evaluated by considering sensitivity, specificity, and the proportion of cancers identified. Results Adjusting for information from first screen attenuated the hazard ratios (HR) associated with 5-year absolute risk (continuous, unadjusted HR [95% confidence interval]: 2.3 [1.8-3.1], adjusted HR: 1.9 [1.4-2.6]), but improved the discriminatory ability of the model (unadjusted AUC: 0.615 [0.559-0.670], adjusted AUC: 0.703 [0.653-0.753]). The sensitivity and specificity of the adjusted model were 0.709 and 0.622, respectively. Thirty-eight percent of all breast cancers were detected in 12% of the study population considered high risk (top five percentile of the Gail model 5-year absolute risk [absolute risk >= 1.43%], were recalled, and/or mammographic density >= 50%). Conclusion The Gail model is able to stratify women based on their individual breast cancer risk in this population. Including information from the first screen can improve prediction in the 5 years after screening. Risk stratification has the potential to pick up more cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:8182 / 8191
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Screening Modalities for Women at Intermediate and High Risk for Breast Cancer
    Spak, David A.
    Le-Petross, Huong T.
    CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS, 2019, 11 (03) : 111 - 116
  • [32] The prognostic potential of mammographic growth rate of invasive breast cancer in the Nijmegen breast cancer screening cohort
    Peters, Jim
    van Dijck, Jos A. A. M.
    Elias, Sjoerd G.
    Otten, Johannes D. M.
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2024, 31 (03) : 166 - 175
  • [33] Breast cancer screening in women at high risk using MRI
    Leach, Martin O.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2009, 22 (01) : 17 - 27
  • [34] Mammographic Breast Density and the Gail Model for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction in a Screening Population
    Jeffrey A. Tice
    Steven R. Cummings
    Elad Ziv
    Karla Kerlikowske
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2005, 94 : 115 - 122
  • [35] Mammographic breast density and the gail model for breast cancer risk prediction in a screening population
    Tice, JA
    Cummings, SR
    Ziv, E
    Kerlikowske, K
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2005, 94 (02) : 115 - 122
  • [36] Breast cancer risk in a screening cohort of Asian and white British/Irish women from Manchester UK
    Evans, D. Gareth
    Brentnall, Adam R.
    Harvie, Michelle
    Astley, Susan
    Harkness, Elaine F.
    Stavrinos, Paula
    Donnelly, Louise S.
    Sampson, Sarah
    Idries, Faiza
    Watterson, Donna
    Cuzick, Jack
    Wilson, Mary
    Jain, Anil
    Harrison, Fiona
    Maxwell, Anthony J.
    Howell, Anthony
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 18
  • [37] Breast Cancer Screening in Women With Dense Breasts: Current Status and Future Directions for Appropriate Risk Stratification and Imaging Utilization
    Miles, Randy C.
    Chou, Shinn-Huey
    Vijapura, Charmi
    Patel, Amy
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2022, 4 (06) : 559 - 567
  • [38] Radiological screening of breast cancer in women at high risk
    Guzman, Gonzalo Jose Romero
    Franjo, Esther Dominguez
    de Las Vacas, Maria Isabel Diez Perez
    Borge, Natalia Alegre
    Bejarano, Daniel Augusto Puentes
    REVISTA DE SENOLOGIA Y PATOLOGIA MAMARIA, 2021, 34 (01): : 37 - 43
  • [39] Breast Cancer Risk and Screening Mammography Frequency Among Multiethnic Women
    Zhang, Jingwen
    McGuinness, Julia E.
    He, Xin
    Jones, Tarsha
    Silverman, Thomas
    Guzman, Ashlee
    May, Benjamin L.
    Kukafka, Rita
    Crew, Katherine D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 64 (01) : 51 - 60
  • [40] Overdiagnosis of breast cancer in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program estimated by the Norwegian Women and Cancer cohort study
    Lund, Eiliv
    Mode, Nicolle
    Waaseth, Marit
    Thalabard, Jean-Christophe
    BMC CANCER, 2013, 13