Breast cancer risk stratification for mammographic screening: A nation-wide screening cohort of 24,431 women in Singapore

被引:4
|
作者
Ho, Peh Joo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wong, Fuh Yong [4 ]
Chay, Wen Yee [5 ]
Lim, Elaine Hsuen [5 ]
Lim, Zi Lin [1 ]
Chia, Kee Seng [2 ,3 ]
Hartman, Mikael [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Li, Jingmei [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Genome Inst Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Canc Ctr Singapore, Div Radiat Oncol, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Natl Canc Ctr Singapore, Div Med Oncol, Singapore, Singapore
[6] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Surg, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2021年 / 10卷 / 22期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
breast cancer; Gail model; mammogram recall status; mammographic density; mammography screening; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; DENSITY; PARTICIPATION; INTERVENTIONS; BENEFITS; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.4297
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Breast cancer incidence is increasing in Asia. However, few women in Singapore attend routine mammography screening. We aim to identify women at high risk of breast cancer who will benefit most from regular screening using the Gail model and information from their first screen (recall status and mammographic density). Methods In 24,431 Asian women (50-69 years) who attended screening between 1994 and 1997, 117 developed breast cancer within 5 years of screening. Cox proportional hazard models were used to study the associations between risk classifiers (Gail model 5-year absolute risk, recall status, mammographic density), and breast cancer occurrence. The efficacy of risk stratification was evaluated by considering sensitivity, specificity, and the proportion of cancers identified. Results Adjusting for information from first screen attenuated the hazard ratios (HR) associated with 5-year absolute risk (continuous, unadjusted HR [95% confidence interval]: 2.3 [1.8-3.1], adjusted HR: 1.9 [1.4-2.6]), but improved the discriminatory ability of the model (unadjusted AUC: 0.615 [0.559-0.670], adjusted AUC: 0.703 [0.653-0.753]). The sensitivity and specificity of the adjusted model were 0.709 and 0.622, respectively. Thirty-eight percent of all breast cancers were detected in 12% of the study population considered high risk (top five percentile of the Gail model 5-year absolute risk [absolute risk >= 1.43%], were recalled, and/or mammographic density >= 50%). Conclusion The Gail model is able to stratify women based on their individual breast cancer risk in this population. Including information from the first screen can improve prediction in the 5 years after screening. Risk stratification has the potential to pick up more cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:8182 / 8191
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Use of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Risk of Breast Cancer: Evidence from a General Female Population and a Mammographic Screening Cohort in Sweden
    Hu, Kejia
    Feychting, Maria
    Lu, Donghao
    Sjolander, Arvid
    Czene, Kamila
    Hall, Per
    Fang, Fang
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [22] Screening of women at high risk for breast cancer
    Narod, Steven A.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 53 (03) : 127 - 130
  • [23] Mammographic screening in male patients at high risk for breast cancer: is it worth it?
    Maria Adele Marino
    Ayca Gucalp
    Doris Leithner
    Delia Keating
    Daly Avendano
    Blanca Bernard-Davila
    Elizabeth A. Morris
    Katja Pinker
    Maxine S. Jochelson
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2019, 177 : 705 - 711
  • [24] Mammographic screening in male patients at high risk for breast cancer: is it worth it?
    Marino, Maria Adele
    Gucalp, Ayca
    Leithner, Doris
    Keating, Delia
    Avendano, Daly
    Bernard-Davila, Blanca
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    Pinker, Katja
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 177 (03) : 705 - 711
  • [25] Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk
    Christina Dilaveri
    Christine Klassen
    Robert Fazzio
    Karthik Ghosh
    Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2019, 11 : 123 - 128
  • [26] Preliminary investigation of mammographic density among women in Riyadh: association with breast cancer risk factors and implications for screening practices
    Albeshan, Salman M.
    Hossain, Syeda Z.
    Mackey, Martin G.
    Peat, Jennifer K.
    Al Tahan, Fatina M.
    Brennan, Patrick C.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2019, 54 : 138 - 147
  • [27] Analysis of Mammographic Breast Density in a Group of Screening Chinese Women and Breast Cancer Patients
    Liu, Jing
    Liu, Pei-Fang
    Li, Jun-Nan
    Qing, Chun
    Ji, Yu
    Hao, Xi-Shan
    Zhang, Xue-Ning
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (15) : 6411 - 6414
  • [28] Breast cancer screening in average and high-risk women
    Rahman, W. Tania
    Helvie, Mark A.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 83 : 3 - 14
  • [29] Screening in women with increased breast cancer risk
    Artmann, Almut
    Hellerhoff, Karin
    Heywang-Koebrunner, Sylvia H.
    BREAST CARE, 2006, 1 (01) : 22 - +
  • [30] Risk-based breast cancer screening strategies in women
    Harkness, Elaine F.
    Astley, Susan M.
    Evans, D. Gareth
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 65 : 3 - 17