Breast cancer risk stratification for mammographic screening: A nation-wide screening cohort of 24,431 women in Singapore

被引:4
|
作者
Ho, Peh Joo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wong, Fuh Yong [4 ]
Chay, Wen Yee [5 ]
Lim, Elaine Hsuen [5 ]
Lim, Zi Lin [1 ]
Chia, Kee Seng [2 ,3 ]
Hartman, Mikael [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Li, Jingmei [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Genome Inst Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Canc Ctr Singapore, Div Radiat Oncol, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Natl Canc Ctr Singapore, Div Med Oncol, Singapore, Singapore
[6] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Surg, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2021年 / 10卷 / 22期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
breast cancer; Gail model; mammogram recall status; mammographic density; mammography screening; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; DENSITY; PARTICIPATION; INTERVENTIONS; BENEFITS; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.4297
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Breast cancer incidence is increasing in Asia. However, few women in Singapore attend routine mammography screening. We aim to identify women at high risk of breast cancer who will benefit most from regular screening using the Gail model and information from their first screen (recall status and mammographic density). Methods In 24,431 Asian women (50-69 years) who attended screening between 1994 and 1997, 117 developed breast cancer within 5 years of screening. Cox proportional hazard models were used to study the associations between risk classifiers (Gail model 5-year absolute risk, recall status, mammographic density), and breast cancer occurrence. The efficacy of risk stratification was evaluated by considering sensitivity, specificity, and the proportion of cancers identified. Results Adjusting for information from first screen attenuated the hazard ratios (HR) associated with 5-year absolute risk (continuous, unadjusted HR [95% confidence interval]: 2.3 [1.8-3.1], adjusted HR: 1.9 [1.4-2.6]), but improved the discriminatory ability of the model (unadjusted AUC: 0.615 [0.559-0.670], adjusted AUC: 0.703 [0.653-0.753]). The sensitivity and specificity of the adjusted model were 0.709 and 0.622, respectively. Thirty-eight percent of all breast cancers were detected in 12% of the study population considered high risk (top five percentile of the Gail model 5-year absolute risk [absolute risk >= 1.43%], were recalled, and/or mammographic density >= 50%). Conclusion The Gail model is able to stratify women based on their individual breast cancer risk in this population. Including information from the first screen can improve prediction in the 5 years after screening. Risk stratification has the potential to pick up more cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:8182 / 8191
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Breast cancer risk stratification in women of screening age: Incremental effects of adding mammographic density, polygenic risk, and a gene panel
    Evans, D. Gareth R.
    van Veen, Elke M.
    Harkness, Elaine F.
    Brentnall, Adam R.
    Astley, Susan M.
    Byers, Helen
    Woodward, Emma R.
    Sampson, Sarah
    Southworth, Jake
    Howell, Sacha J.
    Maxwell, Anthony J.
    Newman, William G.
    Cuzick, Jack
    Howell, Anthony
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 24 (07) : 1485 - 1494
  • [2] The Impact of Mammographic Breast Cancer Screening in Singapore: A Comparison Between Screen-detected and Symptomatic Women
    Wang, Wei Vivian
    Tan, Su Ming
    Chow, Wai Leng
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2011, 12 (10) : 2735 - 2740
  • [3] Risk stratification in breast cancer screening: Cost-effectiveness and harm-benefit ratios for low-risk and high-risk women
    Sankatsing, Valerie D. V.
    van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T.
    Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M.
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    de Koning, Harry J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 147 (11) : 3059 - 3067
  • [4] Changes in mammographic density and risk of breast cancer among a diverse cohort of women undergoing mammography screening
    Gastounioti, Aimilia
    Cohen, Eric A.
    Pantalone, Lauren
    Ehsan, Sarah
    Vasudevan, Sanjana
    Kurudi, Avinash
    Conant, Emily F.
    Chen, Jinbo
    Kontos, Despina
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2023, 198 (03) : 535 - 544
  • [5] Changes in mammographic density and risk of breast cancer among a diverse cohort of women undergoing mammography screening
    Aimilia Gastounioti
    Eric A. Cohen
    Lauren Pantalone
    Sarah Ehsan
    Sanjana Vasudevan
    Avinash Kurudi
    Emily F. Conant
    Jinbo Chen
    Despina Kontos
    Anne Marie McCarthy
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2023, 198 : 535 - 544
  • [6] Mammographic Screening and Risk Factors for Breast Cancer
    Cook, Nancy R.
    Rosner, Bernard A.
    Hankinson, Susan E.
    Colditz, Graham A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 170 (11) : 1422 - 1432
  • [7] Assessing breast cancer risk within the general screening population: developing a breast cancer risk model to identify higher risk women at mammographic screening
    Abdolell, Mohamed
    Payne, Jennifer, I
    Caines, Judy
    Tsuruda, Kaitlyn
    Barnes, Penny J.
    Talbot, Pam J.
    Tong, Olivia
    Brown, Peter
    Rivers-Bowerman, Michael
    Iles, Sian
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (10) : 5417 - 5426
  • [8] Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    Morrish, Oliver W. E.
    Allgood, Prue C.
    Black, Richard
    Gillan, Maureen G. C.
    Willsher, Paula
    Cooke, Julie
    Duncan, Karen A.
    Michell, Michael J.
    Dobson, Hilary M.
    Maroni, Roberta
    Lim, Yit Y.
    Purushothaman, Hema N.
    Suaris, Tamara
    Astley, Susan M.
    Young, Kenneth C.
    Tucker, Lorraine
    Gilbert, Fiona J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 88 : 48 - 56
  • [9] Mammographic features of benign breast lesions and risk of subsequent breast cancer in women attending breast cancer screening
    Posso, Margarita
    Alcantara, Rodrigo
    Vazquez, Ivonne
    Comerma, Laura
    Bare, Marisa
    Louro, Javier
    Quintana, M. Jesus
    Roman, Marta
    Marcos-Gragera, Rafael
    Vernet-Tomas, Maria
    Saladie, Francina
    Vidal, Carmen
    Bargallo, Xavier
    Penalva, Lupe
    Sala, Maria
    Castells, Xavier
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (01) : 621 - 629
  • [10] Harms of Restrictive Risk-Based Mammographic Breast Cancer Screening
    Neal, Colleen H.
    Rahman, W. Tania
    Joe, Annette I.
    Noroozian, Mitra
    Pinsky, Renee W.
    Helvie, Mark A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (01) : 228 - 234