Is Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Beneficial for Sphincter Preservation in Low-Lying Rectal Cancer Patients?

被引:6
作者
Park, In Ja [1 ]
Yu, Chang Sik [1 ]
Lim, Seok-Byung [1 ]
Lee, Jong Lyul [1 ]
Kim, Chan Wook [1 ]
Yoon, Yong Sik [1 ]
Park, Seong Ho [2 ,3 ]
Kim, Jin Cheon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Dept Colon & Rectal Surg, 86 Asanbyeongwon Gil, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Asan Med Ctr, 86 Asanbyeongwon Gil, Seoul 138736, South Korea
关键词
ANTERIOR RESECTION; CHEMORADIATION; SURGERY; INVOLVEMENT; CARCINOMAS; LIKELIHOOD; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000003463
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The present study explored the benefit of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) for sphincter preservation in locally advanced low-lying rectal cancer patients who underwent stapled anastomosis, especially in those with deep and narrow pelvises determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Patients with locally advanced low-lying rectal cancer (<= 5 cm from the anal verge) who underwent stapled anastomosis were included. Patients were categorized into two groups (PCRT+ vs. PCRT-) according to PCRT application. Patients in the PCRT+ group were matched to those in the PCRT-group according to potential confounding factors (age, gender, clinical stage, and body mass index) for sphincter preservation. Sphincter preservation, permanent stoma, and anastomosis-related complications were compared between the groups. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure 12 dimensions representing pelvic cavity depth and width with which deep and narrow pelvis was defined. The impact of PCRT on sphincter preservation and permanent stoma in pelvic dimensions defined as deep and narrow pelvis was evaluated, and factors associated with sphincter preservation and permanent stoma were analyzed. One hundred sixty-six patients were one-to-one matched between the PCRT+ and PCRT- groups. Overall, sphincter-saving surgery was performed in 66.3% and the rates were not different between the 2 groups. Anastomotic complications and permanent stoma occurred nonsignificantly more frequently in the PCRT+ group. PCRT was not associated with higher rate of sphincter preservation in all pelvic dimensions defined as deep and narrow pelvis, while PCRT was related to higher rate of permanent stoma in shorter transverse diameter and interspinous distance. On logistic regression analysis, PCRT was not shown to influence both sphincter preservation and permanent stoma, while longer transverse diameter and interspinous distance were associated with lower rate of permanent stoma. PCRT had no beneficial effect on sphincter preservation in patients with locally advanced low-lying rectal cancer who had undergone stapled anastomosis. In patients with deep and narrow pelvis, PCRT had no impact on sphincter preservation but was associated with higher rate of permanent stoma.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Organ preservation with local excision or active surveillance following chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
    Creavin, B.
    Ryan, E.
    Martin, S. T.
    Hanly, A.
    O'Connell, P. R.
    Sheahan, K.
    Winter, D. C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 116 (02) : 169 - 174
  • [42] Tailoring rectal cancer surgery: Surgical approaches and anatomical insights during deep pelvic dissection for optimal outcomes in low-lying rectal cancer
    Park, Youn Young
    Kim, Nam Kyu
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2024, 8 (05): : 761 - 773
  • [43] Simple criteria to predict margin involvement after chemoradiotherapy and sphincter-sparing for low rectal cancer
    Dumont, F.
    Tilly, C.
    Dartigues, P.
    Goere, D.
    Honore, C.
    Elias, D.
    EJSO, 2015, 41 (09): : 1210 - 1216
  • [44] Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer and anorectal sphincter dysfunction: Review of the literature
    Massaras, Dimitrios
    Pantiora, Eirini
    Sotirova, Eirini
    Dellaportas, Dionysios
    Dafnios, Nikolaos
    Zygogianni, Anna
    Theodosopoulos, Theodosios
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2020, 25 (01): : 35 - 39
  • [45] Artemis as Predictive Biomarker of Responsiveness to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Liu, Hai
    Huang, Runying
    Shan, Jingjing
    Xie, Xuyun
    Wang, Chongwei
    Hu, Peng
    Sun, Xiaonan
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (01) : 535 - 546
  • [46] Multi-institutional Assessment of Sphincter Preservation for Rectal Cancer
    Abdelsattar, Zaid M.
    Wong, Sandra L.
    Birkmeyer, Nancy J.
    Cleary, Robert K.
    Times, Melissa L.
    Figg, Ryan E.
    Peters, Nanette
    Krell, Robert W.
    Campbell, Darrell A., Jr.
    Russell, Marcia M.
    Hendren, Samantha
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (13) : 4075 - 4080
  • [47] Prognostic significance of pathological response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
    Tomono, Ayako
    Yamashita, Kimihiro
    Kanemitsu, Kiyonori
    Sumi, Yasuo
    Yamamoto, Masashi
    Kanaji, Shingo
    Imanishi, Tatsuya
    Nakamura, Tetsu
    Suzuki, Satoshi
    Tanaka, Kenichi
    Kakeji, Yoshihiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 21 (02) : 344 - 349
  • [48] Prognostic Impact of Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Treated with Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Hwang, Mi Ri
    Park, Ji Won
    Park, Sohee
    Yoon, Hyekyoung
    Kim, Dae Yong
    Chang, Hee Jin
    Kim, Sun Young
    Park, Sung Chan
    Choi, Hyo Seong
    Oh, Jae Hwan
    Jeong, Seung-Yong
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (04) : 1345 - 1351
  • [49] Oncologic Outcomes of Organ Preserving Approaches in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated With Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Park, In Ja
    Lee, Jong Lyul
    Yoon, Yong Sik
    Kim, Chan Wook
    Lim, Seok-Byung
    Yu, Chang Sik
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2019, 35 (02) : 65 - 71
  • [50] Complete pathologic response after preoperative rectal cancer chemoradiotherapy
    Ciccocioppo, Anthony
    Stephens, Jacqueline H.
    Hewett, Peter J.
    Rieger, Nicholas A.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 79 (06) : 481 - 484