Anterior cervical microdiscectomy with or without fusion

被引:26
|
作者
Oktenoglu, Tunc
Cosar, Murat
Ozer, Ali Fahir
Iplikcioglu, Celal
Sasani, Mehdi
Canbulat, Nazan
Bavbek, Cengiz
Sarioglu, Ali Cetin
机构
[1] VKF Amer Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, TR-34365 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] VKF Amer Hosp, Therapy & Rehabil Dept, TR-34365 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] VKF Amer Hosp, Dept Radiol, TR-34365 Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Okmeydani Social Insurance Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Istanbul, Turkey
[5] Kocatepe Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Afyon, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES | 2007年 / 20卷 / 05期
关键词
anterior cervical microdiscectomy; fusion; disc height; foramen height;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e31802f80c8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Anterior cervical microdiscectomy (ACD) is commonly applied in the surgical treatment of cervical disc herniation. However, following discectomy procedure to perform a fusion process is still controversial. Therefore, a controlled, multicentric, prospective, randomized study was designed. Material and Method: Totally 20 patients were operated. Eleven patients were operated with applying simple anterior microdiscectomy technique. Nine patients were operated via ACD and fusion with a semirigid plate technique. Preoperative and postoperative [immediate; postoperative first day and postoperative 1 y (mean 13.95mo)] computed tomography studies and plain x-rays were obtained. The cervical disc and bilateral neural foramen heights of the operated level and adjacent segments were calculated. Pain assessment was performed using visual analog pain scale. Mann-Whitney statistical analysis method was applied to compare the outcomes for both groups. Results: Satisfactory result was achieved in both groups. The pain scores for major complaint (arm pain) were decreased significantly in all patients after surgery regardless of the type of technique applied. The improvement in neck pain scores was significant only in patients who were treated with fusion procedure. There were no significant changes in disc height and neural foramen height measurements for both groups in adjacent levels in immediate and 1-year postoperative periods. The patients who were operated with simple ACD technique showed no significant decrease at postoperative first day in disc height and neural foramen height. However, the 1-year postoperative radiologic studies showed a significant decrease in disc height and neural foramen dimensions compared with pre-operative values. The patients who were treated with fusion process showed a significant increase in disc height and nonsignificant increase in neural foramen heights at immediate postoperative study. However, with time, all dimensions showed significant decrease compared with preoperative values. Conclusions: ACD technique offers satisfactory outcome regardless of whether fusion process is applied or not. Fusion with semirigid plate offers an advantage at operated level in immediate postoperative period in regard of disc height and neural foramen height. However, semirigid anterior plates by definition do not stop subsidence and the advantage that is offered by this technique is not persistent. On the other hand, to apply fusion process with semirigid plate system offers significantly less narrowing in disc height compared with simple ACD technique.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 368
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diagnosing Pseudoarthrosis After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Lin, Wenbo
    Ha, Alex
    Boddapati, Venkat
    Yuan, Wen
    Riew, K. Daniel
    NEUROSPINE, 2018, 15 (03) : 194 - 205
  • [32] Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With "Kissing" Allograft Interbodies
    Rasouli, Jonathan
    Fiani, Brian
    Belding, John
    Moore, Timothy A.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [33] Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Is Feasible as an Outpatient Procedure
    Meyer, Bernhard
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 75 (01) : 43 - 43
  • [34] Comparison of postoperative outcomes in patients with and without osteoporosis undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Kammien, Alexander J.
    Galivanche, Anoop R.
    Joo, Peter Y.
    Elaydi, Ali
    Whang, Peter
    Saifi, Comron
    Grauer, Jonathan N.
    Varthi, Arya
    NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2022, 12
  • [35] Meta-Analysis of Treatment for Adjacent Two-Segment Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Comparison Between Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Chen, Lei
    Zhang, Zhongyi
    Li, Ju
    Tong, Peijian
    Xu, Taotao
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2025, 15 (03) : 1839 - 1848
  • [36] The effect of cervical plating on single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Wang, JC
    McDonough, PW
    Endow, K
    Kanim, LEA
    Delamarter, RB
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1999, 12 (06): : 467 - 471
  • [37] Interobservational variation in determining fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures
    Kostas N. Fountas
    Eftychia Z. Kapsalaki
    Betsy E. Smith
    Leonidas G. Nikolakakos
    Charles H. Richardson
    Hugh F. Smisson
    Joe S. Robinson
    David C. Parish
    European Spine Journal, 2007, 16 : 39 - 45
  • [38] Interobservational variation in determining fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures
    Fountas, Kostas N.
    Kapsalaki, Eftychia Z.
    Smith, Betsy E.
    Nikolakakos, Leonidas G.
    Richardson, Charles H.
    Smisson, Hugh F.
    Robinson, Joe S.
    Parish, David C.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 16 (01) : 39 - 45
  • [39] Microdiscectomy and Foraminotomy in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy and Radiculopathy
    Okazaki, Toshiyuki
    Nakagawa, Hiroshi
    Mure, Hideo
    Yagi, Kenji
    Hayase, Hitoshi
    Takagi, Yasushi
    Saito, Koji
    NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2018, 58 (11) : 468 - 476
  • [40] Adjacent-Level Ossification Development in Single-Level Standalone Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plate
    Huang, Christopher
    Mobbs, Ralph
    Selby, Michael
    Phan, Kevin
    Rao, Prashanth
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 11 (03) : 292 - 298