The AJCC 8th Edition Staging System for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities or Trunk: A Cohort Study of the SEER Database

被引:106
作者
Cates, Justin M. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol Microbiol & Immunol, Nashville, TN USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK | 2018年 / 16卷 / 02期
关键词
LYMPH-NODE METASTASIS; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; FRACTIONAL POLYNOMIALS; REGRESSION-MODELS; INFORMATION CRITERION; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; CANCER; PREDICTORS; SURVIVAL; RESECTION;
D O I
10.6004/jnccn.2017.7042
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The AJCC recently published the 8th edition of its cancer staging system. Significant changes were made to the staging algorithm for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities or trunk, including the addition of 2 additional T (size) classifications in lieu of tumor depth and grouping lymph node metastasis (LNM) with distant metastasis as stage IV disease. Whether these changes improve staging system performance is questionable. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis of 21,396 adult patients with STS of the extremity or trunk in the SEER database compares the AJCC 8th edition staging system with the 7th edition and a newly proposed staging algorithm using a variety of statistical techniques. The effect of tumor size on disease-specific survival was assessed by flexible, nonlinear Cox proportional hazard regression using restricted cubic splines and fractional polynomials. Results: The slope of covariate-adjusted log hazards for sarcoma-specific survival decreases for tumors > 8 cm in greatest dimension, limiting prognostic information contributed by the new T4 classification in the AJCC 8th edition. Anatomic depth independently provides significant prognostic information. LNM is not equivalent to distant, non-nodal metastasis. Based on these findings, an alternative staging system is proposed and demonstrated to outperform both AJCC staging schemes. The analyses presented also disclose no evidence of improved clinical performance of the 8th edition compared with the previous edition. Conclusions: The AJCC 8th edition staging system for STS is no better than the previous 7th edition. Instead, a proposed staging system based on histologic grade, tumor size, and anatomic depth shows significantly higher predictive accuracy, with higher model concordance than either AJCC staging system. Changes to existing staging systems should improve the performance of prognostic models. Until such improvements are documented, AJCC committees should refrain from modifying established staging schemes.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 152
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance Analysis of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Staging System for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma and Development of a New Staging Algorithm for Sarcoma-Specific Survival
    Cates, Justin M. M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (13) : 3880 - 3887
  • [32] Modifications of the AJCC 8th edition staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and proposal for a new staging system by incorporating serum tumor markers
    Cheng, Zhangjun
    Lei, Zhengqing
    Si, Anfeng
    Yang, Pinghua
    Luo, Tao
    Guo, Guangmeng
    Zhou, Jiahua
    Wang, Xuan
    Li, Zheng
    Xia, Yong
    Li, Jun
    Wang, Kui
    Yan, Zhenlin
    Wei, Wenxin
    Hartmann, Daniel
    Hueser, Norbert
    Lau, Wan Y.
    Shen, Feng
    HPB, 2019, 21 (12) : 1656 - 1666
  • [33] Evaluation and Recommendation of the 8th Edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging System for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in 820 Patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database
    Wu RuiYang
    Yang ZhiMing
    Feng Jiao
    Zhang Liang
    Zhang Gang
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2021, 25 (01) : 145 - 154
  • [34] The diversity between curatively resected pancreatic head and body-tail cancers based on the 8th edition of AJCC staging system: a multicenter cohort study
    Sheng, Weiwei
    Dong, Ming
    Wang, Guosen
    Shi, Xiaoyang
    Gao, Wei
    Wang, Kewei
    Song, He
    Shi, Gang
    Tan, Xiaodong
    BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [35] 8th edition AJCC and imaging TNM: Time to break-in and assert in the staging process!
    Vaidya, Tanvi
    Desai, Subhash
    Mahajan, Abhishek
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 56 (03) : 271 - 273
  • [36] Evaluation of the prognostic value of the new AJCC 8th edition staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma; a need to subclassify stage III?
    Song, Meiying
    Yoon, Seung Bae
    Lee, In Seok
    Hong, Tae Ho
    Choi, Ho Joong
    Choi, Moon Hyung
    Lee, Myung Ah
    Jung, Eun Sun
    Choi, Myung-Gyu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 104 : 62 - 69
  • [37] Prognostic value of systemic inflammatory markers for oral cancer patients based on the 8th edition of AJCC staging system
    Lee, Sanghoon
    Kim, Dong Wook
    Kwon, Sunmo
    Kim, Hyung Jun
    Cha, In-Ho
    Nam, Woong
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [38] Validation of the 8th edition of the UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Kang, Min
    Zhou, Pingting
    Li, Guisheng
    Yan, Haolin
    Feng, Guosheng
    Liu, Meilian
    Zhu, Jinxian
    Wang, Rensheng
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (41) : 70586 - 70594
  • [39] Recommendations for clinical staging (cTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals
    Rice, Thomas W.
    Ishwaran, Hemant
    Blackstone, Eugene H.
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Kelsen, David P.
    Apperson-Hansen, Carolyn
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2016, 29 (08) : 913 - 919
  • [40] Recommendations for pathologic staging (pTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals
    Rice, T. W.
    Ishwaran, H.
    Hofstetter, W. L.
    Kelsen, D. P.
    Apperson-Hansen, C.
    Blackstone, E. H.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2016, 29 (08) : 897 - 905