The AJCC 8th Edition Staging System for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities or Trunk: A Cohort Study of the SEER Database

被引:106
|
作者
Cates, Justin M. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol Microbiol & Immunol, Nashville, TN USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK | 2018年 / 16卷 / 02期
关键词
LYMPH-NODE METASTASIS; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; FRACTIONAL POLYNOMIALS; REGRESSION-MODELS; INFORMATION CRITERION; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; CANCER; PREDICTORS; SURVIVAL; RESECTION;
D O I
10.6004/jnccn.2017.7042
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The AJCC recently published the 8th edition of its cancer staging system. Significant changes were made to the staging algorithm for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities or trunk, including the addition of 2 additional T (size) classifications in lieu of tumor depth and grouping lymph node metastasis (LNM) with distant metastasis as stage IV disease. Whether these changes improve staging system performance is questionable. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis of 21,396 adult patients with STS of the extremity or trunk in the SEER database compares the AJCC 8th edition staging system with the 7th edition and a newly proposed staging algorithm using a variety of statistical techniques. The effect of tumor size on disease-specific survival was assessed by flexible, nonlinear Cox proportional hazard regression using restricted cubic splines and fractional polynomials. Results: The slope of covariate-adjusted log hazards for sarcoma-specific survival decreases for tumors > 8 cm in greatest dimension, limiting prognostic information contributed by the new T4 classification in the AJCC 8th edition. Anatomic depth independently provides significant prognostic information. LNM is not equivalent to distant, non-nodal metastasis. Based on these findings, an alternative staging system is proposed and demonstrated to outperform both AJCC staging schemes. The analyses presented also disclose no evidence of improved clinical performance of the 8th edition compared with the previous edition. Conclusions: The AJCC 8th edition staging system for STS is no better than the previous 7th edition. Instead, a proposed staging system based on histologic grade, tumor size, and anatomic depth shows significantly higher predictive accuracy, with higher model concordance than either AJCC staging system. Changes to existing staging systems should improve the performance of prognostic models. Until such improvements are documented, AJCC committees should refrain from modifying established staging schemes.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 152
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Establishment and validation of a nomogram model for predicting distant metastasis in medullary thyroid carcinoma: An analysis of the SEER database based on the AJCC 8th TNM staging system
    Chen, Zhufeng
    Mao, Yaqian
    You, Tingting
    Chen, Gang
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [22] Application of the 8th edition of the AJCC yTNM staging system shows improved prognostication in a single center cohort of esophageal carcinomas
    Kroell, Dino
    Noser, Laura
    Erdem, Suna
    Storni, Federico
    Arnold, Dominik
    Dislich, Bastian
    Zlobec, Inti
    Candinas, Daniel
    Seiler, Christian A.
    Langer, Rupert
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2018, 27 (01): : 100 - 105
  • [23] Assessment of the 8th edition of TNM staging system for gastric cancer: the results from the SEER and a single-institution database
    Zhao, Bochao
    Zhang, Jingting
    Zhang, Jiale
    Luo, Rui
    Wang, Zhenning
    Xu, Huimian
    Huang, Baojun
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2018, 14 (29) : 3023 - 3035
  • [24] External validation of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edition, in an independent cohort of oral cancer patients
    Matos, Leandro Luongo
    Dedivitis, Rogerio Aparecido
    Vamondes Kulcsar, Marco Aurelio
    de Mello, Evandro Sobroza
    Alves, Venancio Avancini F.
    Cernea, Claudio Roberto
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 71 : 47 - 53
  • [25] Validation of the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for tongue squamous cell carcinoma
    Kano, Satoshi
    Sakashita, Tomohiro
    Tsushima, Nayuta
    Mizumachi, Takatsugu
    Nakazono, Akira
    Suzuki, Takayoshi
    Yasukawa, Shinichiro
    Homma, Akihiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 23 (05) : 844 - 850
  • [26] A proposal to modify the 8th edition of the UICC staging system for pancreatic adenocarcinoma
    Matsumoto, Takatsugu
    Okabayashi, Takehiro
    Sui, Kenta
    Kimura, Jiro
    Morita, Sojiro
    Iwata, Jun
    Iiyama, Tatsuo
    Kubota, Keiichi
    Shimada, Yasuhiro
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2021, 406 (03) : 667 - 677
  • [27] A population-based validation study of the 8th edition UICC/AJCC TNM staging system for cutaneous melanoma
    Hynes, Matthew C.
    Nguyen, Paul
    Groome, Patti A.
    Asai, Yuka
    Mavor, Meaghan E.
    Baetz, Tara D.
    Hanna, Timothy P.
    BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [28] The prognosis role of AJCC/UICC 8th edition staging system in gastric cancer, a retrospective analysis
    Liu, Jiu-Yang
    Peng, Chun-Wei
    Yang, Xiao-Jun
    Huang, Chao-Qun
    Li, Yan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 10 (01): : 292 - 303
  • [29] Validation of the 8th AJCC Cancer Staging System for Pancreas Neuroendocrine Tumors Using Korean Nationwide Surgery Database
    You, Yunghun
    Jang, Jin-Young
    Kim, Sang Cheol
    Yoon, Yoo-Seok
    Park, Joon Seong
    Cho, Chol Kyoon
    Park, Sang-Jae
    Do Yang, Jae
    Lee, Woo Jung
    Hong, Tae Ho
    Ahn, Keun Soo
    Jeong, Chi-Young
    Lee, Hyeon Kook
    Lee, Seung Eun
    Roh, Young Hoon
    Kim, Hee Joon
    Kim, Hongbeom
    Han, In Woong
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 51 (04): : 1639 - 1652
  • [30] Implications for Breast Cancer Restaging Based on the 8th Edition AJCC Staging Manual
    Plichta, Jennifer K.
    Ren, Yi
    Thomas, Samantha M.
    Greenup, Rachel A.
    Fayanju, Oluwadamilola M.
    Rosenberger, Laura H.
    Hyslop, Terry
    Hwang, E. Shelley
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 271 (01) : 169 - 176