The AJCC 8th Edition Staging System for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities or Trunk: A Cohort Study of the SEER Database

被引:106
|
作者
Cates, Justin M. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol Microbiol & Immunol, Nashville, TN USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK | 2018年 / 16卷 / 02期
关键词
LYMPH-NODE METASTASIS; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; FRACTIONAL POLYNOMIALS; REGRESSION-MODELS; INFORMATION CRITERION; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; CANCER; PREDICTORS; SURVIVAL; RESECTION;
D O I
10.6004/jnccn.2017.7042
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The AJCC recently published the 8th edition of its cancer staging system. Significant changes were made to the staging algorithm for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities or trunk, including the addition of 2 additional T (size) classifications in lieu of tumor depth and grouping lymph node metastasis (LNM) with distant metastasis as stage IV disease. Whether these changes improve staging system performance is questionable. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis of 21,396 adult patients with STS of the extremity or trunk in the SEER database compares the AJCC 8th edition staging system with the 7th edition and a newly proposed staging algorithm using a variety of statistical techniques. The effect of tumor size on disease-specific survival was assessed by flexible, nonlinear Cox proportional hazard regression using restricted cubic splines and fractional polynomials. Results: The slope of covariate-adjusted log hazards for sarcoma-specific survival decreases for tumors > 8 cm in greatest dimension, limiting prognostic information contributed by the new T4 classification in the AJCC 8th edition. Anatomic depth independently provides significant prognostic information. LNM is not equivalent to distant, non-nodal metastasis. Based on these findings, an alternative staging system is proposed and demonstrated to outperform both AJCC staging schemes. The analyses presented also disclose no evidence of improved clinical performance of the 8th edition compared with the previous edition. Conclusions: The AJCC 8th edition staging system for STS is no better than the previous 7th edition. Instead, a proposed staging system based on histologic grade, tumor size, and anatomic depth shows significantly higher predictive accuracy, with higher model concordance than either AJCC staging system. Changes to existing staging systems should improve the performance of prognostic models. Until such improvements are documented, AJCC committees should refrain from modifying established staging schemes.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 152
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Staging soft tissue sarcoma of the head and neck: Evaluation of the AJCC 8th edition revised T classifications
    Cates, Justin M. M.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2019, 41 (07): : 2359 - 2366
  • [2] AJCC eighth edition for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk
    Cates, J. M. M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (09) : 2023 - 2023
  • [3] A relook at the 8th edition of the AJCC TNM staging system of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: A SEER-based study
    Xiang, Jingzhe
    Wang, Zhihong
    Sun, Wei
    Zhang, Hao
    CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 94 (04) : 700 - 710
  • [4] The assessment of 8th edition AJCC prognostic staging system and a simplified staging system for breast cancer: The analytic results from the SEER database
    Zhang, Jingting
    Zhao, Bochao
    Jin, Feng
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (05) : 838 - 847
  • [5] Comparative Performance of the 7th and 8th Editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Systems for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Trunk and Extremities
    Fisher, Sarah B.
    Chiang, Yi-Ju
    Feig, Barry W.
    Cormier, Janice N.
    Hunt, Kelly K.
    Torres, Keila E.
    Roland, Christina L.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (05) : 1126 - 1132
  • [6] Risk factors for survival of head and neck soft tissue sarcomas: A comparison between 7th and 8th edition AJCC staging systems
    Ku, Ja Yoon
    Roh, Jong-Lyel
    Cho, Kyung-Ja
    Song, Joon Seon
    Choi, Seung-Ho
    Nam, Soon Yuhl
    Kim, Sang Yoon
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 106
  • [7] Proposed Modification of the 8th Edition of the AJCC Staging System for Gastric Cancer
    Jiang, Yannan
    Tu, Ruhong
    Lu, Jun
    Zhang, Yan
    Zhu, Jianhua
    Tang, Wei
    Gu, Menghui
    Huang, Changming
    Gu, Xinhua
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (10) : 932 - 938
  • [8] Validation of the 8th Edition of the AJCC TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer using the National Cancer Database
    In, Haejin
    Solsky, I.
    Palis, B.
    Langdon-Embry, M.
    Ajani, J.
    Sano, T.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (12) : 3683 - 3691
  • [9] AJCC 8th Edition oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma staging - Is it an improvement on the AJCC 7th Edition?
    Pollaers, Katherine
    Hinton-Bayre, Anton
    Friedland, Peter L.
    Farah, Camile S.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 82 : 23 - 28
  • [10] Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition Staging System for Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Analysis
    Kamarajah, Sivesh K.
    Burns, William R.
    Frankel, Timothy L.
    Cho, Clifford S.
    Nathan, Hari
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (07) : 2023 - 2030