Chemical recycling: A critical assessment of potential process approaches

被引:41
作者
Quicker, Peter [1 ]
Seitz, Mathias [2 ]
Vogel, Julia [3 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Unit Technol Fuels, Aachen, Germany
[2] Univ Appl Sci Merseburg, Dept Engn & Nat Sci, Proc & Chem React Engn, Merseburg, Germany
[3] German Environm Agcy, Sect Waste Technol 3 2 4, Waste Technol Transfer, Woerlitzer Pl 1, D-06844 Dessau Rosslau, Germany
关键词
Chemical recycling; feedstock recycling; mechanical recycling; plastic waste; gasification; pyrolysis; solvolysis; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; FEEDSTOCK; PYROLYSIS; TECHNOLOGIES; PLASTICS;
D O I
10.1177/0734242X221084044
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Increased media coverage of plastic pollution in the environment and import bans on plastic waste in several countries have resulted in plastic waste becoming one of the most discussed waste streams in recent years. In the European Union (EU), only about one-third of the post-consumer plastic waste is recycled; the rest goes to energy recovery and landfilling in equal parts. In connection to the necessary increase in efforts to achieve the ambitious EU recycling targets, chemical recycling is currently receiving more and more attention. The assumption is that chemical recycling processes could open up new waste streams for recycling and generate valuable raw materials for the chemical industry. Although there exists no legal definition for chemical recycling, there is more or less agreement that it covers the conversion of plastic polymers into their monomers or chemical building blocks. Techniques such as gasification, pyrolysis and liquefaction as well as solvolysis can be used for chemical recycling. So far, only few large-scale plants for chemical recycling exist worldwide. This article presents the different processes by means of examples from (formerly) running installations and their suitability for plastics recycling is assessed. However, to date, only few chemical recycling plants are in continuous operation, and further scientific evidence for the ecological and economic benefits is still necessary for final evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:1494 / 1504
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Aguado J., 2006, FEEDSTOCK RECYCLING, P73, DOI [DOI 10.1002/0470021543.CH3, 10.1002/0470021543.ch3, 10.1002/0470021543.CH3]
[2]  
Aguago J., 1999, RSC CLEAN TECHNOLOGY, P1
[3]   A review on thermal and catalytic pyrolysis of plastic solid waste (PSW) [J].
Al-Salem, S. M. ;
Antelava, A. ;
Constantinou, A. ;
Manos, G. ;
Dutta, A. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 197 :177-198
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2018/ 210 - of 12 February 2018 - on the adoption of the LIFE multiannual work programme for 2018-2020 2018, P1
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Improving Markets for Recycled Plastics: Trends, Prospects and Policy Responses, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264301016-EN, 10.1787/9789264301016-en]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, PLAST FACTS 2015 AN
[7]   Recent Advancements in Plastic Packaging Recycling: A Mini-Review [J].
Beghetto, Valentina ;
Sole, Roberto ;
Buranello, Chiara ;
Al-Abkal, Marco ;
Facchin, Manuela .
MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (17)
[8]   COVID pollution: impact of COVID-19 pandemic on global plastic waste footprint [J].
Benson, Nsikak U. ;
Bassey, David E. ;
Palanisami, Thavamani .
HELIYON, 2021, 7 (02)
[9]  
Buekens A., 2006, Feedstock Recycling and Pyrolysis of Waste Plastics: Converting Waste Plastics into Diesel and Other Fuels, P3, DOI [10.1002/0470021543.ch1, DOI 10.1002/0470021543.CH1]
[10]  
Chemical Recycling Europe, 10 QUEST ANSW BETT U