Evaluating the benefits and risks of social media for wildlife conservation

被引:62
作者
Bergman, Jordanna N. [1 ]
Buxton, Rachel T. [1 ]
Lin, Hsien-Yung [1 ]
Lenda, Magdalena [2 ,3 ]
Attinello, Kayla [1 ]
Hajdasz, Adrianne C. [1 ]
Rivest, Stephanie A. [4 ]
Nguyen, Thuong Tran [1 ]
Cooke, Steven J. [1 ,5 ]
Bennett, Joseph R. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Carleton Univ, Dept Biol, 1125 Colonel By Dr, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
[2] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, Dept Hlth & Environm Sci, 111 Renai Rd,Suzhou Ind Pk, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Nat Conservat, Mickiewicza 33, PL-31120 Krakow, Poland
[4] Univ Ottawa, Dept Biol, 75 Laurier Ave E, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[5] Carleton Univ, Inst Environm & Interdisciplinary Sci, 1125 Colonel By Dr, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
来源
FACETS | 2022年 / 7卷
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
endangered species; Facebook; Instagram; invasive species; internet; Twitter; WORD-OF-MOUTH; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; PROTECTED AREAS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BIODIVERSITY; TRADE; INFORMATION; FRAMEWORK; INSIGHTS; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1139/facets-2021-0112360
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Given its extensive volume and reach, social media has the potential to widely spread conservation messaging and be a powerful tool to mobilize social change for conserving biodiversity. We synthesized gray and primary academic literature to investigate the effects of social media on wildlife conservation, revealing several overarching benefits and risks. We found that social media can increase pro-conservation behaviours among the public, increase conservation funding, and incite policy changes. Conversely, social media can contribute to species exploitation and illegal trade, cause unprecedented increases in tourism in protected areas, and perpetuate anti-conservation behaviours via misinformation. In most cases, we found that content sharing on social media did not result in a detectable impact on conservation; in this paper, however, we focus on providing examples where conservation impact was achieved. We relate these positive and negative outcomes of social media to psychological phenomena that may influence conservation efforts and discuss limitations of our findings. We conclude with recommendations of best practices to social media administrators, public social media users, nongovernmental organizations, and governing agencies to minimize conservation risks while maximizing beneficial outcomes. By improving messaging, policing online misconduct, and providing guidance for action, social media can help achieve wildlife conservation goals.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 397
页数:38
相关论文
共 210 条
[1]  
Abd Mutalib Aini Hasanah, 2018, Biodiversity, V19, P237
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]  
Akpan J., 2018, International Journal of Social Science and Business, V3, P1
[4]   The twenty most charismatic species [J].
Albert, Celine ;
Luque, Gloria M. ;
Courchamp, Franck .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (07)
[5]   Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis [J].
Allum, Nick ;
Sturgis, Patrick ;
Tabourazi, Dimitra ;
Brunton-Smith, Ian .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2008, 17 (01) :35-54
[6]   Harnessing the Influence of Social Proof in Online Shopping: The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth on Sales of Digital Microproducts [J].
Amblee, Naveen ;
Bui, Tung .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, 2011, 16 (02) :91-113
[7]   The Role of Tourism and Recreation in the Spread of Non-Native Species: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Anderson, Lucy G. ;
Rocliffe, Steve ;
Haddaway, Neal R. ;
Dunn, Alison M. .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (10)
[8]  
Andreoli T.P., 2017, Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental-RGSA, V11, P54, DOI [10.24857/rgsa.v11i2.1294, DOI 10.24857/RGSA.V11I2.1294]
[9]  
Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF), WHAT DO YOU WITN AN
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2015, The Star