Evaluation of five high-resolution global model rainfall forecasts over India during monsoon 2020

被引:3
作者
Ashrit, Raghavendra [1 ]
Thota, Mohan S. [1 ]
Dube, Anumeha [1 ]
Kumar, Kondapalli Niranjan [1 ]
Karunasagar, S. [2 ]
Kumar, Sushant [1 ]
Singh, Harvir [1 ]
Meka, Rajasekhar [3 ]
Krishna, R. Phani Murali [4 ]
Mitra, Ashis K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Govt India, Minist Earth Sci, Natl Ctr Medium Range Weather Forecasting, A-50,Sec 62, Noida, India
[2] Govt India, Minist Earth Sci, India Meteorol Dept, Meteorol Ctr, Amaravathi, India
[3] Indian Space Res Org, Sathish Dhawan Space Ctr, Sriharikota, India
[4] Govt India, Minist Earth Sci, Indian Inst Trop Meteorol, Pune, India
关键词
Monsoon; heavy rains; forecast verification; spatial verification; OBJECT-BASED VERIFICATION; PRECIPITATION FORECASTS; POTENTIAL PREDICTABILITY; SUMMER MONSOON; HEAVY RAINFALL; PREDICTION; SKILL; VARIABILITY; SYSTEM; REGION;
D O I
10.1007/s12040-022-01990-2
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This study aims to evaluate the performance of five global medium-range operational NWP model rainfall forecasts, namely NCUM, UKMO, IMD GFS, NCEP GFS and ECMWF to provide an intercomparison of rainfall forecasts over India in terms of skill in predicting daily rainfall (24-hr accumulated rainfall). Verification and intercomparison of rainfall forecasts over India during monsoon 2020 (JJAS) are carried out using both (i) standard traditional verification methods (POD, FAR, RMSE, etc.) and (ii) advanced spatial verification methods (MODE, FSS). The evaluation also includes assessment of large-scale mean patterns, temporal evolution of spells during the season, dominant modes using spectral analysis, basin-scale rainfall time series and isolated heavy rainfall cases. Our analysis suggests that some of the key large-scale aspects of monsoon (seasonal mean, active/break spells, and northward propagation) are realistically represented in all the models, with slight discrepancies. In addition, the spectral analysis of rainfall is in association with observed rainfall in Day-1 forecast and deteriorates with lead times. Synoptic variance in NCUM on longer leading times is closer to observations. While the standard categorical verification over India as a whole (spatial averaged) suggests that ECMWF forecast skill is relatively high among the five models, the verification over the sub-regions shows mixed results with no clear unique higher performer among the models. In addition, basin-scale verification of rainfall forecasts for five rivers over the Indian subcontinent shows a fairly good amount of skill in terms of CC and RMSE up to Day-3 with comparable scores among the models. The advanced spatial verification metrics, like MODE and FSS, applied to the models show varying skills with different attributes. However, for FSS, forecast skill was high (low) for lower (higher) rainfall thresholds of 20 mm/day (100 mm/day). Though different models with different spatial resolutions show reasonable skill scores for larger regions, for high-impact heavy rainfall events, which are generally localised, the models have very comparable poor skill with no clear edge by a model among the five models.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Systematic Errors in South Asian Monsoon Simulation: Importance of Equatorial Indian Ocean Processes [J].
Annamalai, H. ;
Taguchi, Bunmei ;
McCreary, Julian P. ;
Nagura, Motoki ;
Miyama, Toru .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2017, 30 (20) :8159-8178
[2]   Prediction of the August 2018 heavy rainfall events over Kerala with high-resolution NWP models [J].
Ashrit, Raghavendra ;
Sharma, Kuldeep ;
Kumar, Sushant ;
Dube, Anumeha ;
Karunasagar, S. ;
Arulalan, T. ;
Mamgain, Ashu ;
Chakraborty, Paromita ;
Kumar, Sumit ;
Lodh, Abhishek ;
Dutta, Devajyoti ;
Momin, Imranali ;
Bushair, M. T. ;
Prakash, Buddhi J. ;
Jayakumar, A. ;
Rajagopal, E. N. .
METEOROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2020, 27 (02)
[3]  
Ashrit R, 2015, MAUSAM, V66, P375
[4]   The Indian drought of 2002 - a sub-seasonal phenomenon? [J].
Bhat, G. S. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 132 (621) :2583-2602
[5]  
Bullock R.G., 2016, NCAR TECHNOTE NCARTN, P1, DOI [DOI 10.5065/D61V5CBS, 10.5065/D61V5CBS.]
[6]   Forecast verification: current status and future directions [J].
Casati, B. ;
Wilson, L. J. ;
Stephenson, D. B. ;
Nurmi, P. ;
Ghelli, A. ;
Pocernich, M. ;
Damrath, U. ;
Ebert, E. E. ;
Brown, B. G. ;
Mason, S. .
METEOROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2008, 15 (01) :3-18
[7]   Simulation of Indian summer monsoon circulation and rainfall using RegCM3 [J].
Dash, S. K. ;
Shekhar, M. S. ;
Singh, G. P. .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2006, 86 (1-4) :161-172
[8]   Object-based verification of precipitation forecasts. Part I: Methodology and application to mesoscale rain areas [J].
Davis, Christopher ;
Brown, Barbara ;
Bullock, Randy .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2006, 134 (07) :1772-1784
[9]   Object-based verification of precipitation forecasts. Part II: Application to convective rain systems [J].
Davis, Christopher ;
Brown, Barbara ;
Bullock, Randy .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2006, 134 (07) :1785-1795
[10]   The Method for Object-Based Diagnostic Evaluation (MODE) Applied to Numerical Forecasts from the 2005 NSSL/SPC Spring Program [J].
Davis, Christopher A. ;
Brown, Barbara G. ;
Bullock, Randy ;
Halley-Gotway, John .
WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2009, 24 (05) :1252-1267