The Ecosystem Services Concept: Gaps between Science and Practice in River Landscape Management

被引:16
作者
Boeck, Kerstin [1 ]
Muhar, Susanne [1 ]
Muhar, Andreas [2 ]
Polt, Renate [1 ]
机构
[1] BOKU Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna, Inst Hydrobiol & Aquat Ecosyst Management IHG, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[2] BOKU Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna, Inst Landscape Dev Recreat & Conservat Planning I, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
来源
GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY | 2015年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
assessment tools; ecosystem services; interviews; river landscape; river management; science; stakeholders; values of nature; CHALLENGES; FRAMEWORK; POLICY; IMPLEMENTATION; CONSERVATION; LIMITATIONS; BENEFITS; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.14512/gaia.24.1.8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the imbalance between the significance of the ecosystem services concept in scientific literature and its actual implementation in processes of river landscape management. Particular attention has been paid to stakeholders' awareness of the concept, their perception of the practicability, and their concerns regarding implementation. In two Austrian river landscapes, qualitative interviews (n=110) were conducted with decision makers, stakeholders in river landscape management processes, and other persons benefiting from landscape functions. There is little awareness of the concept in most stakeholder groups. Those who are already familiar with it reported that it currently only plays a minor role in their work. Nevertheless, they regarded the concept as a potentially relevant tool: not only for assessments of river ecosystems, but also for bolstering argumentation, communication, and education, as well as for minimizing redundancies with already implemented concepts such as landscape functionality.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 40
页数:9
相关论文
共 70 条
[51]  
Rosenzweig M. L., 2003, WIN WIN ECOLOGY EART
[52]  
Russi D., 2013, IEEP LOND BRUSS
[53]   Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs: The case of an urban floodplain in Vienna, Austria [J].
Sanon, Samai ;
Hein, Thomas ;
Douven, Wim ;
Winkler, Peter .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 111 :159-172
[54]   The Challenges of Incorporating Cultural Ecosystem Services into Environmental Assessment [J].
Satz, Debra ;
Gould, Rachelle K. ;
Chan, Kai M. A. ;
Guerry, Anne ;
Norton, Bryan ;
Satterfield, Terre ;
Halpern, Benjamin S. ;
Levine, Jordan ;
Woodside, Ulalia ;
Hannahs, Neil ;
Basurto, Xavier ;
Klain, Sarah .
AMBIO, 2013, 42 (06) :675-684
[55]   Linking Ecosystem Services with Cultural Landscape Research [J].
Schaich, Harald ;
Bieling, Claudia ;
Plieninger, Tobias .
GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2010, 19 (04) :269-277
[56]   Ecosystem Services as a Contested Concept: A Synthesis of Critique and Counter-Arguments [J].
Schroter, Matthias ;
van der Zanden, Emma H. ;
van Oudenhoven, Alexander P. E. ;
Remme, Roy P. ;
Serna-Chavez, Hector M. ;
de Groot, Rudolf S. ;
Opdam, Paul .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2014, 7 (06) :514-523
[57]   Getting the Message Across Biodiversity Science and Policy Interfaces - A Review [J].
Spierenburg, Marja .
GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2012, 21 (02) :125-134
[58]  
Tallis H. T., 2011, INVEST 2 2 0 USERS G
[59]  
TEEB, 2010, EC EC BIOD MAINSTR E
[60]   Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development [J].
Termorshuizen, Jolande W. ;
Opdam, Paul .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2009, 24 (08) :1037-1052