Numerical verification of the weak turbulent model for swell evolution

被引:34
|
作者
Korotkevich, A. O. [1 ]
Pushkarev, A. [2 ,3 ]
Resio, D. [4 ]
Zakharov, V. E. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] RAS, LD Landau Theoret Phys Inst, Moscow 119334, Russia
[2] RAS, PN Lebedev Phys Inst, Moscow 119991, Russia
[3] Waves & Solitons LLC, Phoenix, AZ 85045 USA
[4] USA, Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Coastal & Hydraul Lab, Vicksburg, MS 39180 USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Dept Math, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
weak turbulence; wave kinetic equation; Hasselmann equation; numerical simulation;
D O I
10.1016/j.euromechflu.2007.08.004
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
The purpose of this article is to numerically verify the theory of weak turbulence. We have performed numerical simulations of an ensemble of nonlinearly interacting free gravity waves (a swell) by two different methods: by solving the primordial dynamical equations describing the potential flow of an ideal fluid with a free surface, and by solving the kinetic Hasselmann equation, describing the wave ensemble in the framework of the theory of weak, turbulence. In both cases we have observed effects predicted by this theory: frequency downshift, angular spreading and formation of a Zakharov-Filonenko spectrum I-omega similar to omega(-4). To achieve quantitative coincidence of the results obtained by different methods, we have to augment the Hasselmann kinetic equation by an empirical dissipation term S-diss modeling the coherent effects of white-capping. Using the standard dissipation terms from the operational wave predicting model (WAM) leads to a significant improvement on short times, but does not resolve the discrepancy completely, leaving the question about the optimal choice of Sdiss open. In the long run, WAM dissipative terms essentially overestimate dissipation. (C) 2007 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 387
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] VERIFICATION STUDY OF A NUMERICAL GREENHOUSE MICROCLIMATE MODEL
    AVISSAR, R
    MAHRER, Y
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1982, 25 (06): : 1711 - 1720
  • [32] Experimental verification of solenoid valve numerical model
    Lagodzinski, Jakub
    Tkacz, Eliza
    15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE MECHATRONIC SYSTEMS AND MATERIALS, MSM'20, 2020, : 357 - 361
  • [33] Numerical verification of the new microplane model for concrete
    Li, YJ
    Ozbolt, J
    Eligehausen, R
    COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, : 127 - 132
  • [34] VERIFICATION OF A NUMERICAL OCEAN MODEL OF THE ARABIAN SEA
    SIMMONS, RC
    LUTHER, ME
    OBRIEN, JJ
    LEGLER, DM
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1988, 93 (C12): : 15437 - &
  • [35] Verification of tree induced suction with numerical model
    Ishak, M. F.
    Zolkepli, M. F.
    Yunus, M. Y. M.
    Ali, N.
    Kassim, A.
    Zaini, M. S., I
    PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2021, 121
  • [36] SPAR BUOY NUMERICAL MODEL CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION
    Damiani, L.
    Musci, E.
    Tomasicchio, G. R.
    D'Alessandro, F.
    COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN MARINE ENGINEERING VI (MARINE 2015), 2015, : 814 - 825
  • [37] Numerical verification of a two-layer Boussinesq-type model for surface gravity wave evolution
    Liu, Zhongbo
    Fang, Kezhao
    WAVE MOTION, 2019, 85 : 98 - 113
  • [38] Numerical simulation of a vertical, turbulent wall fire in space vehicles in weak gravity
    Wang, X
    Suzuki, T
    Ochiai, Y
    Oda, T
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES, 1999, 42 (136) : 85 - 91
  • [39] VERIFICATION OF MODEL PROBABILITY-DISTRIBUTIONS IN TURBULENT HEATED JETS
    BELYAEV, YV
    BRIL, AI
    ZHDANOVICH, OB
    KHODYKO, YV
    COMBUSTION EXPLOSION AND SHOCK WAVES, 1990, 26 (06) : 709 - 714
  • [40] Verification of a quasi-linear model for gyrokinetic turbulent transport
    Staebler, G. M.
    Belli, E. A.
    Candy, J.
    Kinsey, J. E.
    Dudding, H.
    Patel, B.
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2021, 61 (11)