Radical retropubic prostatectomy - The golden standard for prostate cancer?

被引:6
作者
Thiel, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Klin Urol & Kinderurol, D-44309 Dortmund, Germany
来源
UROLOGE A | 2004年 / 43卷 / 01期
关键词
radical prostatectomy; results; technique; complications;
D O I
10.1007/s00120-003-0470-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Radical retropubic prostatectomy is still the most frequent surgical procedure for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Improvements in the surgical techniques have contributed to significant reduction in operative time (median 69 min) and in rates of early and late complications. The surgical procedure and perioperative management are described, and results in 180 consecutive cases are presented. Severe postoperative complications did not occur. More than 95% of patients were completely dry within 6 months. Erectile function recovered in 71% of patients with bilateral preservation of the neurovascular bundles and in 34% of patients with unilateral nerve sparing. These results are in good agreement with data from the literature and confirm the outstanding role of the retropubic approach as the gold standard for radical prostatectomy,as well as the reproducibility of the result in community-based hospitals.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / +
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   COMPLICATIONS AND MORBIDITY FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY [J].
ACKERMANN, R ;
FROHMULLER, HGW .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1983, 1 (01) :62-67
[2]   Intraoperative and perioperative morbidity of contemporary radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1243 patients: Results of a single center between 1999 and 2002 [J].
Augustin, H ;
Hammerer, P ;
Graefen, M ;
Palisaar, R ;
Noldus, J ;
Fernandez, S ;
Huland, H .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 43 (02) :113-118
[3]   Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies [J].
Catalona, WJ ;
Carvalhal, GF ;
Mager, DE ;
Smith, DS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (02) :433-438
[4]   RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY - THE PROS AND CONS OF THE PERINEAL VERSUS RETROPUBIC APPROACH [J].
FRAZIER, HA ;
ROBERTSON, JE ;
PAULSON, DF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (03) :888-890
[5]   Ambulatory radical retropubic prostatectomy [J].
Hajjar, JH ;
Budd, HA ;
Wachtel, Z ;
Howhannesian, A .
UROLOGY, 1998, 51 (03) :443-447
[6]   RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY - MORBIDITY AND URINARY CONTINENCE IN 418 CONSECUTIVE CASES [J].
HAUTMANN, RE ;
SAUTER, TW ;
WENDEROTH, UK .
UROLOGY, 1994, 43 (02) :47-51
[7]   A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer [J].
Kattan, MW ;
Eastham, JA ;
Stapleton, AMF ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Scardino, PT .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (10) :766-771
[8]   Patient-reported sexual function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy [J].
Noldus, J ;
Michl, U ;
Graefen, M ;
Haese, A ;
Hammerer, P ;
Huland, H .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2002, 42 (02) :118-124
[9]   THE USE OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, CLINICAL STAGE AND GLEASON SCORE TO PREDICT PATHOLOGICAL STAGE IN MEN WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
PARTIN, AW ;
YOO, J ;
CARTER, HB ;
PEARSON, JD ;
CHAN, DW ;
EPSTEIN, JI ;
WALSH, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (01) :110-114
[10]   Factors predicting recovery of erections after radical prostatectomy [J].
Rabbani, F ;
Stapleton, AMF ;
Kattan, MW ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (06) :1929-1934