Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery: a single institutional experience

被引:3
作者
Liu, Shanglei [1 ]
Contreras, Nicolas [2 ]
Krezalek, Monika A. [3 ]
Aziz, Mohamed A. Abd El [1 ,4 ]
Merchea, Amit [5 ]
Kelley, Scott R. [1 ]
Behm, Kevin [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, 200 First St SW,Gonda Bldg, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Northshore Univ HealthSyst, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Evanston, IL USA
[4] Texas Tech Univ, Paul L Foster Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Hlth Sci Ctr, El Paso, TX USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词
Robotic trans-anal minimally invasive surgery; Robotic TAMIS; Rectal cancer; ENDOSCOPIC MICROSURGERY; DEFECT; EXCISION;
D O I
10.1007/s13304-021-01233-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (R-TAMIS) is a novel and evolving technique with limited reported outcomes in the literature. Compared to the laparoscopic approach, R-TAMIS provides enhanced optics, increased degrees of motion, superior ergonomics, and easier maneuverability in the confines of the rectum. We report a single institution experience at a large quaternary referral academic medical center with R-TAMIS using the da Vinci Xi (R) platform. This is a retrospective review of electronic medical records at the Mayo Clinic from September 2017 to April 2020. It includes all available clinical documentations for patients undergoing R-TAMIS at our institution. Patient demographics, intraoperative data (procedure time, tumor size and distance), complications, and pathology reports were reviewed. A total of 28 patients underwent R-TAMIS. Median follow-up was 23.65 months. Sixteen patients underwent R-TAMIS for endoscopically unresectable rectal polyps, eight for rectal adenocarcinoma, two for rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and two for rectal carcinoid tumor. The mean size of the lesions was 4.1 cm (range 0.2-13.8 cm). The mean location of lesions was 7.8 cm (range 0-16 cm) from the anal verge. The mean operative time was 132.5 +/- 46.8 min. There was one 30-day complication, and no deaths. Twenty-three (82%) patients were discharged the day of surgery. R-TAMIS is a safe, feasible, and effective technique for the surgical treatment of a variety of rectal pathology. A hybrid technique can be used for the resecting tumors extending into the anal canal.
引用
收藏
页码:1011 / 1016
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Transanal Employment of Single Access Ports Is Feasible for Rectal Surgery
    Barendse, Renee M.
    Doornebosch, Pascal G.
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    Fockens, Paul
    Dekker, Evelien
    de Graaf, Eelco J. R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 256 (06) : 1030 - 1033
  • [2] A multi-centre randomized controlled trial of open vs closed management of the rectal defect after transanal endoscopic microsurgery
    Brown, C. J.
    Hochman, D.
    Raval, M. J.
    Moloo, H.
    Phang, P. T.
    Bouchard, A.
    Williams, L.
    Drolet, S.
    Boushey, R.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 21 (09) : 1025 - 1031
  • [3] The surgical defect after transanal endoscopic microsurgery: open versus closed management
    Brown, Carl
    Raval, Manoj J.
    Phang, P. Terry
    Karimuddin, Ahmer A.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (03): : 1078 - 1082
  • [4] Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Versus Standard Transanal Excision for the Removal of Rectal Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Clancy, Cillian
    Burke, John P.
    Albert, Mathew R.
    O'Connell, P. Ronan
    Winter, Desmond C.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2015, 58 (02) : 254 - 261
  • [5] Laparoscopic gastric fundus tamponade: a novel adaptation of the Toupet fundoplication for large paraesophageal hernia repair
    Ferzli, George
    Liu, Shinban
    Iskandar, Mazen
    Fingerhut, Abe
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (11): : 4803 - 4811
  • [6] Transanal minimal invasive surgery for rectal lesions: should the defect be closed?
    Hahnloser, D.
    Cantero, R.
    Salgado, G.
    Dindo, D.
    Rega, D.
    Delrio, P.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 17 (05) : 397 - 402
  • [7] HOMPRES R, 2014, BRIT J SURG
  • [8] Krezalek MA, 2019, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V156, pS1403
  • [9] NASA-Task Load Index Differentiates Surgical Approach Opportunities for Improvement in Colon and Rectal Surgery
    Law, Katherine E.
    Lowndes, Bethany R.
    Kelley, Scott R.
    Blocker, Renaldo C.
    Larson, David W.
    Hallbeck, M. Susan
    Nelson, Heidi
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 271 (05) : 906 - 912
  • [10] Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: A viable operative alternative in selected patients with rectal lesions
    Neary, P
    Makin, GB
    White, TJ
    White, E
    Hartley, J
    MacDonald, A
    Lee, PWR
    Monson, JRT
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 10 (09) : 1106 - 1111