The Feasibility of Anterior Spinal Access The Vascular Corridor at the L5-S1 Level for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:9
|
作者
Ng, Julia Poh-Hwee [1 ]
Scott-Young, Matthew [2 ,3 ]
Chan, Daniel Nim-Cho [4 ]
Oh, Jacob Yoong-Leong [1 ]
机构
[1] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Div Spine Surg, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Gold Coast Spine, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[3] Bond Univ, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[4] Sengkang Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Div Spine Surg, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
anterior spine surgery; iliocaval vasculature; imaging; interbody fusion; lumbosacral junction; lumbosacral region; magnetic resonance imaging; spine; surgical planning; vascular anatomy; VASCULAR ANATOMY; SURGERY; INJURY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000003948
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Cross-sectional study. Objective. To analyze the feasibility of anterior spinal access to the vascular corridor at the L5-S1 junction, by evaluating three crucial anatomical landmarks. This provides a framework for risk-stratification for the clinician during preoperative evaluation. Summary of Background Data. The anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) offers many advantages for fusion at the L5-S1 junction. However, the variant iliac vasculature may preclude safe anterior access. Methods. Five hundred magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images of the L5-S1 level were identified, with 379 meeting inclusion criteria. We graded the anterior access into three grades, namely, easy, advanced, or difficult by looking at three important anatomical landmarks-the vascular corridor (narrow if <= 25 mm, medium if 25-35mm [inclusive], and wide if >35 mm), the left common iliac vein (LCIV) location (grades AD based on the relative position of the LCIV to the L5-S1 disc space), and the presence or absence of a fat plane. Results. Our results showed that 43.27% of the patients had wide corridor for the anterior access, 19.26% of patients had no fat plane, and 7.65% had a LCIV that extended past the midline of the disc (Grade C, D: >50%). By combining these three factors, 37.20% would have easy anterior access, while a minority (1.85%) would have a difficult anterior access. Conclusion. The ALIF at L5-S1 offers significant benefits to the patient. The surgeon should be aware of the dangers in an anterior access by looking at three crucial factors to determine whether the access is easy, advanced, or difficult. Patients with a difficult access should be attempted by experts, vascular access surgeons, or consider an alternative approach to L5-S1.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 989
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mini-Open Anterior Retroperitoneal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Degeneration Disease
    Ohtori, Seiji
    Orita, Sumihisa
    Yamauchi, Kazuyo
    Eguchi, Yawara
    Ochiai, Nobuyasu
    Kishida, Shunji
    Kuniyoshi, Kazuki
    Aoki, Yasuchika
    Nakamura, Junichi
    Ishikawa, Tetsuhiro
    Miyagi, Masayuki
    Kamoda, Hiroto
    Suzuki, Miyako
    Kubota, Gou
    Sakuma, Yoshihiro
    Oikawa, Yasuhiro
    Inage, Kazuhide
    Sainoh, Takeshi
    Sato, Jun
    Fujimoto, Kazuki
    Shiga, Yasuhiro
    Abe, Koki
    Toyone, Tomoaki
    Inoue, Gen
    Takahashi, Kazuhisa
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 56 (04) : 1051 - 1059
  • [32] Effect of Anatomic Variability and Level of Approach on Perioperative Vascular Complications With Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Nourian, Ardalan Alen
    Cunningham, Christine M.
    Bagheri, Ali
    Bruffey, James D.
    Eastlack, Robert K.
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (02) : E73 - E77
  • [33] Iliac screws may not be necessary in long-segment constructs with L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion: cadaveric study of stability and instrumentation strain
    Hlubek, Randall J.
    Godzik, Jakub
    Newcomb, Anna G. U. S.
    Lehrman, Jennifer N.
    de Andrada, Bernardo
    Bohl, Michael A.
    Farber, Samuel H.
    Kelly, Brian P.
    Turner, Jay D.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (05) : 942 - 950
  • [34] Anterior Versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 in Hybrid Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis of Radiographic Results, Mechanical Complications, and Clinical Outcomes
    Park, Se-Jun
    Kang, Dong-Ho
    Park, Jin-Sung
    Kang, Minwook
    Lee, Chong-Suh
    Jung, Kyunghun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (05)
  • [35] How to deal with this complication: Intraoperative anterior cage migration in L5-S1 resolved with a lumbar hybrid fusion technique
    Quillo-Olvera, Javier
    Quillo-Olvera, Diego
    Quillo-Resendiz, Javier
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    CIRUGIA Y CIRUJANOS, 2021, 89 (05): : 669 - 673
  • [36] Influence of Vascular Anatomy on the Radiologic Outcomes in Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5-S1
    Chung, Nam-Su
    Lee, Han-Dong
    Chung, Hee-Woong
    Jeon, Chang-Hoon
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (01): : E36 - E40
  • [37] Use of an Alternative Surgical Corridor in Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at the L5-S1 Segment A Technical Report
    Chung, Nam-Su
    Jeon, Chang-Hoon
    Lee, Han-Dong
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (07): : 293 - 296
  • [38] Risk Factors for the Aggravation of Sagittal Balance After L5-S1 Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Lee, Hyung Rae
    Cho, Jae Hwan
    Lee, Dong-Ho
    Seok, Sang Yun
    Hwang, Chang Ju
    Lee, Choon Sung
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 175
  • [39] Optimal selection and preparation of fresh frozen corticocancellous allografts for anterior interbody lumbar spinal fusion
    Chen, DY
    Kummer, FJ
    Spivak, JM
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1997, 10 (06): : 532 - 536
  • [40] Morphometric MRI Imaging Study of the Corridor for the Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique at L1-L5
    Li, Jia Xi Julian
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    Phan, Kevin
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 111 : E678 - E685