The Feasibility of Anterior Spinal Access The Vascular Corridor at the L5-S1 Level for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:9
|
作者
Ng, Julia Poh-Hwee [1 ]
Scott-Young, Matthew [2 ,3 ]
Chan, Daniel Nim-Cho [4 ]
Oh, Jacob Yoong-Leong [1 ]
机构
[1] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Div Spine Surg, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Gold Coast Spine, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[3] Bond Univ, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[4] Sengkang Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Div Spine Surg, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
anterior spine surgery; iliocaval vasculature; imaging; interbody fusion; lumbosacral junction; lumbosacral region; magnetic resonance imaging; spine; surgical planning; vascular anatomy; VASCULAR ANATOMY; SURGERY; INJURY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000003948
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Cross-sectional study. Objective. To analyze the feasibility of anterior spinal access to the vascular corridor at the L5-S1 junction, by evaluating three crucial anatomical landmarks. This provides a framework for risk-stratification for the clinician during preoperative evaluation. Summary of Background Data. The anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) offers many advantages for fusion at the L5-S1 junction. However, the variant iliac vasculature may preclude safe anterior access. Methods. Five hundred magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images of the L5-S1 level were identified, with 379 meeting inclusion criteria. We graded the anterior access into three grades, namely, easy, advanced, or difficult by looking at three important anatomical landmarks-the vascular corridor (narrow if <= 25 mm, medium if 25-35mm [inclusive], and wide if >35 mm), the left common iliac vein (LCIV) location (grades AD based on the relative position of the LCIV to the L5-S1 disc space), and the presence or absence of a fat plane. Results. Our results showed that 43.27% of the patients had wide corridor for the anterior access, 19.26% of patients had no fat plane, and 7.65% had a LCIV that extended past the midline of the disc (Grade C, D: >50%). By combining these three factors, 37.20% would have easy anterior access, while a minority (1.85%) would have a difficult anterior access. Conclusion. The ALIF at L5-S1 offers significant benefits to the patient. The surgeon should be aware of the dangers in an anterior access by looking at three crucial factors to determine whether the access is easy, advanced, or difficult. Patients with a difficult access should be attempted by experts, vascular access surgeons, or consider an alternative approach to L5-S1.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 989
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Postoperative Radiculitis After L5-S1 Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Araghi, Kasra
    Fourman, Mitchell S.
    Merrill, Robert K.
    Maayan, Omri
    Zhao, Eric
    Pajak, Anthony
    Subramanian, Tejas
    Kim, David N.
    Kamil, Robert
    Shahi, Pratyush
    Sheha, Evan D.
    Dowdell, James E.
    Iyer, Sravisht
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    SPINE, 2023, 48 (18) : 1317 - 1325
  • [2] Laparoscopic discectomy with anterior interbody fusion of L5-S1
    Olsen, D
    McCord, D
    Law, M
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1996, 10 (12): : 1158 - 1162
  • [3] Extraforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at the L5-S1 Level: Technical Considerations and Feasibility
    Kurzbuch, Arthur Robert
    Kaech, Denis
    Baranowski, Pawel
    Baranowska, Alicja
    Recoules-Arche, Didier
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 78 (05) : 507 - 512
  • [4] Outcomes of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion of L5-S1 using a novel implant with anterior plate fixation
    Szadkowski, Marc
    d'Astorg, Henri
    Bouhali, Haroun
    Aleksic, Ivan
    Ramos-Pascual, Sonia
    Fiere, Vincent
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 20 (10) : 1618 - 1628
  • [5] Minimally Invasive Deformity Correction Technique: Initial Case Series of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 for Multilevel Lumbar Interbody Fusion in a Lateral Decubitus Position
    Singh, Shikha
    McCloskey, Kyle
    Ahmad, Hasan S.
    Turlip, Ryan
    Ghenbot, Yohannes
    Sinha, Saurabh
    Yoon, Jang W.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 162 : E416 - E426
  • [6] The anatomical feasibility of anterior intra- and extra-bifurcation approaches to L5-S1: an anatomic study based on lumbar MRI
    Gong, Ke
    Zhu, Ziwei
    Wei, Jiemao
    Li, Feng
    Xiong, Wei
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (07) : 1068 - 1078
  • [7] Degenerative disc disease and isthmic spondylolisthesis have similar outcomes after L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Basques, Bryce A.
    Gandhi, Sapan D.
    Rudisill, Samuel S.
    Perez-Albela, Alejandro
    Phillips, Frank M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2025, 136
  • [8] Usefulness of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 Level Compared to Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Mun, Hah Yong
    Ko, Myeong Jin
    Kim, Young Baeg
    Park, Seung Won
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 63 (06) : 723 - 729
  • [9] Risk Assessment of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Access in Degenerative Spinal Conditions
    Singh, Kern
    Cha, Elliot D. K.
    Lynch, Conor P.
    Nolte, Michael T.
    Parrish, James M.
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Myers, Jonathan A.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (07): : E601 - E609
  • [10] The Effect of Changes in Segmental Lordosis on Global Lumbar and Adjacent Segment Lordosis After L5-S1 Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Nguyen, Austin Q.
    Harvey, Jackson P.
    Federico, Vincent P.
    Nolte, Michael T.
    Khanna, Krishn
    Gandhi, Sapan D.
    Sheha, Evan D.
    Colman, Matthew W.
    Phillips, Frank M.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2025, 15 (01) : 112 - 120