The Efficacy of Preoperative Gabapentin in Spinal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:6
|
作者
Han, Chao [1 ]
Kuang, Ming-jie [2 ]
Ma, Jian-xiong [1 ]
Ma, Xin-long [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Hosp, Dept Orthoped, 406 Jiefang South Rd, Tianjin 300211, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Med Univ, Tianjin, Peoples R China
关键词
Gabapentin; analgesia; spinal surgery; meta-analysis; randomized controlled trials; visual analog scale score; side effect; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF; PREEMPTIVE GABAPENTIN; LUMBAR LAMINECTOMY; MORPHINE CONSUMPTION; DOUBLE-BLIND; PLACEBO; DISKECTOMY; PREGABALIN; MANAGEMENT; GABAPENTIN/PREGABALIN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Pain management after spinal surgery has been studied for years. Gabapentin is a third-generation antiepileptic drug that selectively affects the nociceptive process and has been used for pain relief after surgery. However, the relationship between gabapentin and postoperative pain in spinal surgery is still controversial. Objective: To assess the efficacy of the pre-emptive use of gabapentin in spinal surgery. Study Design: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Setting: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched. Methods: This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to compare the use of gabapentin with placebo in spinal surgery regarding to the following: the mean difference (MD) of postoperative opioid requirements, the changes of visual analog scale (VAS) scores in 2 groups, and the incidence rate of adverse effects. An electronic-based search of all related literatures was conducted, and only RCTs for spinal surgery were included. The MD of postoperative opioid requirements and VAS scores and the relative risk (RR) of the incidence rate of adverse effects in the gabapentin group versus the placebo group were extracted throughout the study. Results: Ten trials, involving 827 patients, met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The total morphine consumption was significantly lower over the first 24 hours postoperatively in the gabapentin group (P < 0.05). The VAS scores at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours were less in the gabapentin group (P < 0.05). The incidence rate of vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention was significantly less in the gabapentin groups (RR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.32-0.86, P < 0.05; RR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.22-0.66, P < 0.05; RR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.34-0.98, P < 0.05, respectively). Limitations: All of the studies we screened were published online except for unpublished articles. Only 10 RCTs met our inclusion criteria, so the sample size was still relatively small. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that the administration of gabapentin is effective in reducing postoperative opioid consumption, VAS scores, and some side effects after spinal surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 661
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy of Electrical Stimulation for Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Shakib Akhter
    Abdul Rehman Qureshi
    Idris Aleem
    Hussein Ali El-Khechen
    Shadman Khan
    Omaike Sikder
    Moin Khan
    Mohit Bhandari
    Ilyas Aleem
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [22] Efficacy of Electrical Stimulation for Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Akhter, Shakib
    Qureshi, Abdul Rehman
    Aleem, Idris
    El-Khechen, Hussein Ali
    Khan, Shadman
    Sikder, Omaike
    Khan, Moin
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Aleem, Ilyas
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [23] Efficacy of Antimanic Treatments: Meta-analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials
    Yildiz, Ayseguel
    Vieta, Eduard
    Leucht, Stefan
    Baldessarini, Ross J.
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 36 (02) : 375 - 389
  • [24] The Efficacy of Empathy Training: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    van Berkhout, Emily Teding
    Malouff, John M.
    JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 63 (01) : 32 - 41
  • [25] Meta-analysis of rizatriptan efficacy in randomized controlled clinical trials
    Ferrari, MD
    Loder, E
    McCarroll, KA
    Lines, CR
    CEPHALALGIA, 2001, 21 (02) : 129 - 136
  • [26] Efficacy of probiotics on anxietyA meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Liu, Bangshan
    He, Yunan
    Wang, Mi
    Liu, Jin
    Ju, Yumeng
    Zhang, Yan
    Liu, Tiebang
    Li, Lingjiang
    Li, Qi
    DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2018, 35 (10) : 935 - 945
  • [27] Efficacy of Antimanic Treatments: Meta-analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials
    Ayşegül Yildiz
    Eduard Vieta
    Stefan Leucht
    Ross J Baldessarini
    Neuropsychopharmacology, 2011, 36 : 375 - 389
  • [28] Remifentanil in Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Greco, Massimiliano
    Landoni, Giovanni
    Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe
    Cabrini, Luca
    Ruggeri, Laura
    Pasculli, Nicola
    Giacchi, Veronica
    Sayeg, Jan
    Greco, Teresa
    Zangrillo, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2012, 26 (01) : 110 - 116
  • [29] Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of surgery for rectal cancer
    Simillis, Constantinos
    Lal, Nikhil
    Thoukididou, Sarah N.
    Kontovounisios, Christos
    Smith, Jason J.
    Hompes, Roel
    Adamina, Michel
    Tekkis, Paris P.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2019, : 8S - 8S
  • [30] Vasopressin in Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Duenser, Martin W.
    Bouvet, Olivier
    Knotzer, Hans
    Arulkumaran, Nish
    Hajjar, Ludhmila Abrahao
    Ulmer, Hanno
    Hasibeder, Walter R.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2018, 32 (05) : 2225 - 2232