Active tag recommendation for interactive entity search: Interaction effectiveness and retrieval performance

被引:3
作者
Ruotsalo, Tuukka [1 ,2 ]
Weber, Sean [2 ]
Gajos, Krzysztof Z. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Comp Sci, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Comp Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Harvard Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Cambridge, MA USA
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Tag recommendation; Active learning; Information retrieval; Search user interfaces; User study;
D O I
10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102856
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We introduce active tag recommendation for interactive entity search, an approach that actively learns to suggest tags from preceding user interactions with the recommended tags. The approach utilizes an online reinforcement learning model and observes user interactions on the recommended tags to reward or penalize the model. Active tag recommendation is implemented as part of a realistic search engine indexing a large collection of movie data. The approach is evaluated in task-based user experiments comparing a complete search system enhanced with active tag recommendation to a control system in which active tag recommendation is not available. In the experiment, participants (N = 45) performed search tasks on the movie domain and the corresponding search interactions, information selections, and entity rankings were logged and analyzed. The results show that active tag recommendation (1) improves the ranking of entities compared to written-query interaction, (2) increases the amount of interaction and effectiveness of interactions to rank entities that end up being selected in a task, and (3) reduces, but does not substitute, the need for written-query interaction (4) without compromising task execution time. The results imply that active learning for search support can help users to interact with entity search systems by reducing the need for writing queries and improve search outcomes without compromising the time used for searching.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Andolina Salvatore., 2015, P 20 INT C INTELLIGE, P300
  • [2] Auer P., 2003, Journal of Machine Learning Research, V3, P397, DOI 10.1162/153244303321897663
  • [3] Balog K., 2011, TREC
  • [4] Balog K, 2018, Entity-oriented search
  • [5] Balog K, 2013, SIGIR'13: THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 36TH INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGIR CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, P737
  • [6] Bar-Yossef Ziv, 2011, P 20 INT C WORLD WID, P107, DOI DOI 10.1145/1963405.1963424
  • [7] Personalized and object-centered tag recommendation methods for Web 2.0 applications
    Belem, Fabiano M.
    Martins, Eder F.
    Almeida, Jussara M.
    Goncalves, Marcos A.
    [J]. INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2014, 50 (04) : 524 - 553
  • [8] Blanco R, 2013, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V8219, P33, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-41338-4_3
  • [9] Boldi P., 2008, PROC 17 ACM C INF KN, P609
  • [10] Playing Your Cards Right: The Effect of Entity Cards on Search Behaviour and Workload
    Bota, Horatiu
    Zhou, Ke
    Jose, Joemon M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 ACM CONFERENCE ON HUMAN INFORMATION INTERACTION AND RETRIEVAL (CHIIR'16), 2016, : 131 - 140