Patient satisfaction and acceptability of an on-demand and on-prophylaxis device for factor VIII delivery in patients with hemophilia A

被引:9
|
作者
Di Minno, Giovanni [1 ]
Santagostino, Elena [2 ]
Morfini, Massimo [3 ]
Ettorre, Cosimo [4 ]
Cultrera, Dorina [5 ]
Baldacci, Erminia [6 ]
Russo, Eleonora [7 ]
Gallucci, Cristiano [7 ]
机构
[1] Azienda Univ Policlin Federico II, Dept Clin Med & Surg, Naples, Italy
[2] Osped Maggiore Policlin, Hemophilia & Thrombosis Ctr, IRCCS Fdn Ca Granda, Milan, Italy
[3] Italian Assoc Haemophilia Ctr AICE, Sci Comm, Florence, Italy
[4] Policlin Giovanni XXIII, Haemophilia & Thrombosis Ctr, Bari, Italy
[5] Univ Policlin Vittorio Emanuele, Reg Ctr Hemophilia, Hematol Unit, Italy Osped, Catania, Italy
[6] Univ Sapienza, Hemophilia Thrombosis & Hematol Ctr, Dipartimento Biotecnol Cellulari & Ematol, Rome, Italy
[7] Pfizer Srl Rome, Med Dept, Rome, Italy
来源
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE | 2019年 / 13卷
关键词
factor VIII delivery; device; hemophilia A; patient satisfaction; adherence; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ADHERENCE; REGIMENS; BARRIERS; ADOLESCENTS; BURDEN; COSTS;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S175254
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: FuseNGO is a relatively new device consisting of a prefilled dual-chamber syringe (DCS) that was recently introduced for the reconstitution of recombinant factor VIII. Herein, the DCS device was assessed using five questionnaires with the primary aim of evaluating patient perceptions and preferences. Methods: An observational, non-interventional, longitudinal study on 86 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of hemophilia A was carried out at 21 sites in Italy. Each patient underwent a baseline visit and final study visit within 3-6 months. Patients were administered five questionnaires: HemoPREF; Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM); VeritasPRO; Hemophilia Well-being Index (HWBI); Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) + Classroom Impairment Questions (CIQ): Hemophilia Specific (HS). Results: Compared to baseline, scores for HemoPREF were higher at follow-up; significant increases in the percentage of positive responses were seen for all questions regarding the ease of use (P<0.05). The mean time needed for the reconstruction of the device at baseline was 11 minutes (range 1-30 minutes), which decreased to 6 minutes (range 30 seconds to 25 minutes) at follow-up. All scores in the TSQM indicated good satisfaction with the device. Patients reported an adherence of >70% in the VeritasPRO questionnaire, and the majority of patients reported in the HWBI that hemophilia A did not affect their lives in a significant way. The perceived level of overall impairment was 30% as reported in the WPAI + CIQ: HS, indicating little impairment. There were no safety concerns. Conclusion: Considering patient-reported outcomes, the DCS device was associated with easier preparation, storage, disposal of equipment, and overall use. Of particular note, preparation times were reduced by around 50%. The majority of patients were satisfied with the device and overall adherence scores were high. Considering these results, the device has the potential to increase adherence to therapy and, possibly, reduce healthcare costs.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 240
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [11] Modeling to Predict Factor VIII Levels Associated with Zero Bleeds in Patients with Severe Hemophilia A Initiated on Tertiary Prophylaxis
    Chowdary, Pratima
    Fischer, Kathelijn
    Collins, Peter W.
    Cotterill, Amy
    Konkle, Barbara A.
    Blanchette, Victor
    Pipe, Steven W.
    Berntorp, Erik
    Wolfsegger, Martin
    Engl, Werner
    Spotts, Gerald
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2020, 120 (05) : 728 - 736
  • [12] A comparison between on-demand usage of rFVIIa vs prophylaxis use of emicizumab in high titer inhibitory hemophilia A patients in Iran A cost-utility analysis
    Saiyarsarai, Parisa
    Robabpour Derakhshan, Atefeh
    Khedmati, Jamaleddin
    Eshghi, Peyman
    Seyedifar, Meysam
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (40) : E27303
  • [13] Ex vivo evaluation of the effect of plasma-derived factor VIII/von Willebrand factor in patients with severe hemophilia A on emicizumab prophylaxis
    Raventos, Aida
    Arias-Salgado, Elena G.
    Perez, Alba
    Alvarez-Roman, Maria Teresa
    Butta, Nora V.
    Monzon Manzano, Elena
    Acuna, Paula
    Jimenez-Yuste, Victor
    Costa, Montserrat
    Bravo, Maria Isabel
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [14] Functional evaluation of joint in moderate to severe hemophilia patients treated with on-demand factor replacement: insights from a single hemophilia treatment center in Bangladesh
    Ghosh, Sujan
    Tory, Sanzina Sadia
    Nazneen, Humayra
    Farhad, Nurul
    Islam, Salwa
    Hasan, Mohammad Jahid
    Biswas, Akhil Ranjan
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 36 (01)
  • [15] Prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment with BAY 81-8973, a full-length plasma protein-free recombinant factor VIII product: results from a randomized trial (LEOPOLD II)
    Kavakli, K.
    Yang, R.
    Rusen, L.
    Beckmann, H.
    Tseneklidou-Stoeter, D.
    Enriquez, M. Maas
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2015, 13 (03) : 360 - 369
  • [16] A cost-effectiveness analysis of the prophylaxis versus on-demand regimens in severe hemophilia A patients under 12 years old in southern Iran
    Zahedi, Zohreh
    Karimi, Mehran
    Keshavarz, Khosro
    Haghpanah, Sezaneh
    Ravangard, Ramin
    HEMATOLOGY, 2021, 26 (01) : 240 - 248
  • [17] A real-world evidence analysis of the impact of switching from factor VIII to emicizumab prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A without inhibitors
    Escobar, Miguel
    Bullano, Michael
    Mokdad, Ali G.
    Caicedo, Jorge
    Schultz, Bob G.
    Fan, Qi
    Verma, Sumit
    EXPERT REVIEW OF HEMATOLOGY, 2023, 16 (06) : 467 - 474
  • [18] Efficacy of emicizumab prophylaxis versus factor VIII prophylaxis for treatment of hemophilia A without inhibitors: network meta-analysis and sub-group analyses of the intra-patient comparison of the HAVEN 3 trial
    Reyes, Adriana
    Revir, Cedric
    Niggli, Markus
    Chebon, Sammy
    Schlagmueller, Simone
    Flacke, Jan-Paul
    Zortel, Max
    Paz-Priel, Ido
    Asikanius, Elina
    Hampton, Roger
    Mahajan, Anadi
    Schmidt, Elvira
    Edwards, Susan C.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2019, 35 (12) : 2079 - 2087
  • [19] Cost analysis of prophylaxis with activated prothrombin complex concentrate vs. on-demand therapy with activated factor VII in severe haemophilia A patients with inhibitors, in Spain
    Villarrubia, R.
    Oyagueez, I.
    Alvarez-Roman, M. T.
    Mingot-Castellano, M. E.
    Parra, R.
    Casado, M. A.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2015, 21 (03) : 320 - 329
  • [20] Fixed doses of N8-GP prophylaxis maintain moderate-to-mild factor VIII levels in the majority of patients with severe hemophilia A
    Chowdary, Pratima
    Carcao, Manuel
    Holme, Pal A.
    Jimenez-Yuste, Victor
    Lentz, Steven R.
    Moss, Judi
    Poulsen, Lone H.
    Shen, Chunduo
    Tosetto, Alberto
    Wheeler, Allison
    Santagostino, Elena
    RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2019, 3 (03) : 542 - 554