Patient satisfaction and acceptability of an on-demand and on-prophylaxis device for factor VIII delivery in patients with hemophilia A

被引:9
|
作者
Di Minno, Giovanni [1 ]
Santagostino, Elena [2 ]
Morfini, Massimo [3 ]
Ettorre, Cosimo [4 ]
Cultrera, Dorina [5 ]
Baldacci, Erminia [6 ]
Russo, Eleonora [7 ]
Gallucci, Cristiano [7 ]
机构
[1] Azienda Univ Policlin Federico II, Dept Clin Med & Surg, Naples, Italy
[2] Osped Maggiore Policlin, Hemophilia & Thrombosis Ctr, IRCCS Fdn Ca Granda, Milan, Italy
[3] Italian Assoc Haemophilia Ctr AICE, Sci Comm, Florence, Italy
[4] Policlin Giovanni XXIII, Haemophilia & Thrombosis Ctr, Bari, Italy
[5] Univ Policlin Vittorio Emanuele, Reg Ctr Hemophilia, Hematol Unit, Italy Osped, Catania, Italy
[6] Univ Sapienza, Hemophilia Thrombosis & Hematol Ctr, Dipartimento Biotecnol Cellulari & Ematol, Rome, Italy
[7] Pfizer Srl Rome, Med Dept, Rome, Italy
来源
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE | 2019年 / 13卷
关键词
factor VIII delivery; device; hemophilia A; patient satisfaction; adherence; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ADHERENCE; REGIMENS; BARRIERS; ADOLESCENTS; BURDEN; COSTS;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S175254
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: FuseNGO is a relatively new device consisting of a prefilled dual-chamber syringe (DCS) that was recently introduced for the reconstitution of recombinant factor VIII. Herein, the DCS device was assessed using five questionnaires with the primary aim of evaluating patient perceptions and preferences. Methods: An observational, non-interventional, longitudinal study on 86 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of hemophilia A was carried out at 21 sites in Italy. Each patient underwent a baseline visit and final study visit within 3-6 months. Patients were administered five questionnaires: HemoPREF; Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM); VeritasPRO; Hemophilia Well-being Index (HWBI); Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) + Classroom Impairment Questions (CIQ): Hemophilia Specific (HS). Results: Compared to baseline, scores for HemoPREF were higher at follow-up; significant increases in the percentage of positive responses were seen for all questions regarding the ease of use (P<0.05). The mean time needed for the reconstruction of the device at baseline was 11 minutes (range 1-30 minutes), which decreased to 6 minutes (range 30 seconds to 25 minutes) at follow-up. All scores in the TSQM indicated good satisfaction with the device. Patients reported an adherence of >70% in the VeritasPRO questionnaire, and the majority of patients reported in the HWBI that hemophilia A did not affect their lives in a significant way. The perceived level of overall impairment was 30% as reported in the WPAI + CIQ: HS, indicating little impairment. There were no safety concerns. Conclusion: Considering patient-reported outcomes, the DCS device was associated with easier preparation, storage, disposal of equipment, and overall use. Of particular note, preparation times were reduced by around 50%. The majority of patients were satisfied with the device and overall adherence scores were high. Considering these results, the device has the potential to increase adherence to therapy and, possibly, reduce healthcare costs.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 240
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Factor VIII replacement prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A transitioning to adults: a systematic literature review
    Sun, Jing
    Zhou, Xuan
    Hu, Nan
    ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [2] Evaluation of factor VIII prophylaxis of plasmatic origin in patients with severe hemophilia A
    Sambolino, Fabiana
    Medina, Vania
    Bentos, Jimena
    Torres, Rommel
    Berro, Maximiliano
    Canessa, Cecilia
    Rodriguez, Ismael
    Turcatti, Paola
    Insagaray, Juan
    REVISTA MEDICA DEL URUGUAY, 2022, 38 (04):
  • [3] Factor VIII replacement prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A transitioning to adults: a systematic literature review
    Jing Sun
    Xuan Zhou
    Nan Hu
    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 16
  • [4] Is Continuous Low-Dose Prophylaxis Superior to On-Demand Treatment for Patients with Hemophilia?
    Windyga, Jerzy
    SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 2016, 42 (05) : 533 - 540
  • [5] A Budget Impact Model of Hemophilia Bypassing Agent Prophylaxis Relative to Recombinant Factor VIIa On-Demand
    Mehta, Darshan A.
    Oladapo, Abiola O.
    Epstein, Joshua D.
    Novack, Aaron R.
    Neufeld, Ellis J.
    Hay, Joel W.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2016, 22 (02) : 149 - U155
  • [6] Randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial of routine prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment with sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII in adults with severe hemophilia A (SPINART)
    Manco-Johnson, M. J.
    Kempton, C. L.
    Reding, M. T.
    Lissitchkov, T.
    Goranov, S.
    Gercheva, L.
    Rusen, L.
    Ghinea, M.
    Uscatescu, V.
    Rescia, V.
    Hong, W.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2013, 11 (06) : 1119 - 1127
  • [7] Factor VIII alloantibody inhibitors: cost analysis of immune tolerance induction vs. prophylaxis and on-demand with bypass treatment
    Earnshaw, S. R.
    Graham, C. N.
    McDade, C. L.
    Spears, J. B.
    Kessler, C. M.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2015, 21 (03) : 310 - 319
  • [8] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF PRIMARY PROPHYLAXIS, COMPARED WITH ON-DEMAND TREATMENT, FOR PATIENTS WITH SEVERE HEMOPHILIA TYPE A IN COLOMBIA
    Castro Jaramillo, Hector Eduardo
    Moreno Viscaya, Mabel
    Mejia, Aurelio E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2016, 32 (05) : 337 - 347
  • [9] Longitudinal dynamic changes in factor VIII inhibitor titers in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors receiving emicizumab prophylaxis
    Naruto Shimonishi
    Kana Sasai
    Kenichi Ogiwara
    Shoko Furukawa
    Yuto Nakajima
    Kuniyoshi Mizumachi
    Koji Yada
    Masahiro Takeyama
    Midori Shima
    Narumi Mizuno
    Keiji Nogami
    International Journal of Hematology, 2023, 118 : 690 - 698
  • [10] Longitudinal dynamic changes in factor VIII inhibitor titers in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors receiving emicizumab prophylaxis
    Shimonishi, Naruto
    Sasai, Kana
    Ogiwara, Kenichi
    Furukawa, Shoko
    Nakajima, Yuto
    Mizumachi, Kuniyoshi
    Yada, Koji
    Takeyama, Masahiro
    Shima, Midori
    Mizuno, Narumi
    Nogami, Keiji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2023, 118 (06) : 690 - 698