Patient satisfaction and acceptability of an on-demand and on-prophylaxis device for factor VIII delivery in patients with hemophilia A

被引:9
作者
Di Minno, Giovanni [1 ]
Santagostino, Elena [2 ]
Morfini, Massimo [3 ]
Ettorre, Cosimo [4 ]
Cultrera, Dorina [5 ]
Baldacci, Erminia [6 ]
Russo, Eleonora [7 ]
Gallucci, Cristiano [7 ]
机构
[1] Azienda Univ Policlin Federico II, Dept Clin Med & Surg, Naples, Italy
[2] Osped Maggiore Policlin, Hemophilia & Thrombosis Ctr, IRCCS Fdn Ca Granda, Milan, Italy
[3] Italian Assoc Haemophilia Ctr AICE, Sci Comm, Florence, Italy
[4] Policlin Giovanni XXIII, Haemophilia & Thrombosis Ctr, Bari, Italy
[5] Univ Policlin Vittorio Emanuele, Reg Ctr Hemophilia, Hematol Unit, Italy Osped, Catania, Italy
[6] Univ Sapienza, Hemophilia Thrombosis & Hematol Ctr, Dipartimento Biotecnol Cellulari & Ematol, Rome, Italy
[7] Pfizer Srl Rome, Med Dept, Rome, Italy
关键词
factor VIII delivery; device; hemophilia A; patient satisfaction; adherence; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ADHERENCE; REGIMENS; BARRIERS; ADOLESCENTS; BURDEN; COSTS;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S175254
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: FuseNGO is a relatively new device consisting of a prefilled dual-chamber syringe (DCS) that was recently introduced for the reconstitution of recombinant factor VIII. Herein, the DCS device was assessed using five questionnaires with the primary aim of evaluating patient perceptions and preferences. Methods: An observational, non-interventional, longitudinal study on 86 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of hemophilia A was carried out at 21 sites in Italy. Each patient underwent a baseline visit and final study visit within 3-6 months. Patients were administered five questionnaires: HemoPREF; Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM); VeritasPRO; Hemophilia Well-being Index (HWBI); Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) + Classroom Impairment Questions (CIQ): Hemophilia Specific (HS). Results: Compared to baseline, scores for HemoPREF were higher at follow-up; significant increases in the percentage of positive responses were seen for all questions regarding the ease of use (P<0.05). The mean time needed for the reconstruction of the device at baseline was 11 minutes (range 1-30 minutes), which decreased to 6 minutes (range 30 seconds to 25 minutes) at follow-up. All scores in the TSQM indicated good satisfaction with the device. Patients reported an adherence of >70% in the VeritasPRO questionnaire, and the majority of patients reported in the HWBI that hemophilia A did not affect their lives in a significant way. The perceived level of overall impairment was 30% as reported in the WPAI + CIQ: HS, indicating little impairment. There were no safety concerns. Conclusion: Considering patient-reported outcomes, the DCS device was associated with easier preparation, storage, disposal of equipment, and overall use. Of particular note, preparation times were reduced by around 50%. The majority of patients were satisfied with the device and overall adherence scores were high. Considering these results, the device has the potential to increase adherence to therapy and, possibly, reduce healthcare costs.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 240
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GUID MAN HAEM
[2]   Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease [J].
Atkinson M.J. ;
Sinha A. ;
Hass S.L. ;
Colman S.S. ;
Kumar R.N. ;
Brod M. ;
Rowland C.R. .
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2 (1)
[3]   HaemoPREF: Further evaluation of patient perception and preference for treatment in a real world setting [J].
Bonanad, S. ;
Schulz, M. ;
Gordo, A. ;
Spurden, D. ;
Cicchetti, M. ;
Cappelleri, J. C. ;
Tolley, C. ;
Staunton, H. ;
Brohan, E. .
HAEMOPHILIA, 2017, 23 (06) :884-893
[4]   Patient preference and ease of use for different coagulation factor VIII reconstitution device scenarios: a cross-sectional survey in five European countries [J].
Cimino, Ernesto ;
Linari, Silvia ;
Malerba, Mara ;
Halimeh, Susan ;
Biondo, Francesca ;
Westfeld, Martina .
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2014, 8 :1713-1720
[5]   VERITAS-Pro: a new measure of adherence to prophylactic regimens in haemophilia [J].
Duncan, N. ;
Kronenberger, W. ;
Roberson, C. ;
Shapiro, A. .
HAEMOPHILIA, 2010, 16 (02) :247-255
[6]  
Fernández-Arias Isabel, 2016, Farm Hosp., V40, P579, DOI 10.7399/fh.2016.40.6.10478
[7]   Barriers to compliance with prophylaxis therapy in haemophilia [J].
Hacker, MR ;
Geraghty, S ;
Manco-Johnson, M .
HAEMOPHILIA, 2001, 7 (04) :392-396
[8]   The health and economic burden of haemophilia in Belgium: a rare, expensive and challenging disease [J].
Henrard, Severine ;
Devleesschauwer, Brecht ;
Beutels, Philippe ;
Callens, Michael ;
De Smet, Frank ;
Hermans, Cedric ;
Speybroeck, Niko .
ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2014, 9
[9]   The benefits of prophylaxis: views of adolescents with severe haemophilia [J].
Khair, K. ;
Gibson, F. ;
Meerabeau, L. .
HAEMOPHILIA, 2012, 18 (03) :e286-e289
[10]   The social burden and quality of life of patients with haemophilia in Italy [J].
Kodra, Yllka ;
Cavazza, Marianna ;
Schieppati, Arrigo ;
De Santis, Marta ;
Armeni, Patrizio ;
Arcieri, Romano ;
Calizzani, Gabriele ;
Fattore, Giovanni ;
Manzoli, Lamberto ;
Mantovani, Lorenzo ;
Taruscio, Domenica .
BLOOD TRANSFUSION, 2014, 12 :S567-S575