Using Human-Machine Interfaces to Convey Feedback in Automated Driving

被引:7
作者
Shull, Emily M. [1 ]
Gaspar, John G. [2 ]
McGehee, Daniel, V [3 ]
Schmitt, Rose [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Ind & Syst Engn, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Natl Adv Driving Simulator, Coralville, IA USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
TRUST; DRIVER; SUPPORT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/15553434221076827
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The next decade will see a rapid increase in the prevalence of partial vehicle automation, specifically conditional automation (i.e., SAE level 3; SAE, 2018). In conditional automation, the expectation is that the user is still receptive to takeover and can disengage while the automation is active, but as the automation approaches its operational limits, or the end of its operational design domain, it issues a request to intervene and the user is expected to retake control. A human-machine interface (HMI) that can safely and effectively transition control is therefore very important. This simulator study investigated how features of the HMI design, specifically feedback about the confidence (i.e., current capability) of the automation influenced transition of control. Participants were assigned to one of three conditions, which received varying amounts of visual and auditory feedback regarding the automation's confidence. Findings suggest 3-stage auditory-visual feedback about the automation's confidence may improve subsequent takeover performance compared to 3-stage visual and a control group without feedback. This research demonstrates the potential value of providing more insight into automated feature performance in conditional automation.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 42
页数:14
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]   Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance [J].
Lee, JD ;
See, KA .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2004, 46 (01) :50-80
[12]   Supporting trust calibration and the effective use of decision aids by presenting dynamic system confidence information [J].
McGuirl, John M. ;
Sarter, Nadine B. .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2006, 48 (04) :656-665
[13]   The "Out-of-the-Loop" concept in automated driving: proposed definition, measures and implications [J].
Merat, Natasha ;
Seppelt, Bobbie ;
Louw, Tyron ;
Engstrom, Johan ;
Lee, John D. ;
Johansson, Emma ;
Green, Charles A. ;
Katazaki, Satoshi ;
Monk, Chris ;
Itoh, Makoto ;
McGehee, Daniel ;
Sunda, Takashi ;
Unoura, Kiyozumi ;
Victor, Trent ;
Schieben, Anna ;
Keinath, Andreas .
COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2019, 21 (01) :87-98
[14]   The Importance of Interruption Management for Usefulness and Acceptance of Automated Driving [J].
Naujoks, Frederik ;
Wiedemann, Katharina ;
Schoemig, Nadja .
AUTOMOTIVEUI 2017: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMOTIVE USER INTERFACES AND INTERACTIVE VEHICULAR APPLICATIONS, 2017, :254-263
[15]  
Parasuraman R., 1993, Int. J. Aviat. Psychol, V3, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1207/S15327108IJAP03011, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap03011, 10.1207/s15327108ijap03011, 10.1207/s15327108ijap0301_1, DOI 10.1207/S15327108IJAP0301_1]
[16]   Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration [J].
Parasuraman, Raja ;
Manzey, Dietrich H. .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2010, 52 (03) :381-410
[17]  
Politis I., 2015, P 7 INT C AUT US INT, DOI 10.1145/2799250.2799262
[18]  
R Core Team, 2020, R LANGUAGE ENV STAT
[19]  
SAE International, 2018, Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles, P3016
[20]   The impact of cognitive feedback on judgment performance and trust with decision aids [J].
Seong, Younho ;
Bisantz, Ann M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2008, 38 (7-8) :608-625