The effectiveness of livestock protection measures against wolves (Canis lupus) and implications for their co-existence with humans

被引:53
作者
Bruns, Antonia [1 ,2 ]
Waltert, Matthias [1 ]
Khorozyan, Igor [1 ]
机构
[1] Georg August Univ Gottingen, JF Blumenbach Inst Zool & Anthropol, Workgrp Endangered Species, Burgerstr 50, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Uilenstede 176,1224, NL-1183 AP Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Carnivore; Depredation; Efficiency; Germany; Intervention; Predator; WOLF DEPREDATION; ATTITUDES; CONFLICT; FLADRY; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; CARNIVORE; RECOVERY; VALLEY; DOGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00868
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Wolves (Canis lupus) can kill domestic livestock resulting in intense conflicts with humans. Damage to livestock should be reduced to facilitate human-wolf coexistence and ensure positive outcomes of conservation efforts. Current knowledge on the effectiveness of livestock protection measures from wolves is limited and scattered in the literature. In this study, we compiled a dataset of 30 cases describing the application of 11 measures of protecting cattle and smaller livestock against wolves, estimated their effectiveness as a relative risk of damage, and identified the best measures for damage reduction. We found that: (1) lethal control and translocation were less effective than other measures, (2) deterrents, especially fladry which is a fence with ropes marked by hanging colored flags that sway in the wind and provide a visual warning signal, were more effective than guarding dogs; (3) deterrents, fencing, calving control and herding were very effective, but the last two measures included only one case each; and (4) protection of cattle was more effective than that of small stock (sheep and goats, or sheep only) and mixed cattle and small stock. In all of these cases, the relative risk of damage was reduced by 50-100%. Considering Germany as an example of a country with a recovering wolf population and escalating human-wolf conflicts, we suggest electric fences and electrified fladry as the most promising measures, which under suitable conditions can be accompanied by well-trained livestock guarding dogs, and the temporary use of deterrents during critical periods such as calving and lambing seasons. Further research in this field is of paramount importance to efficiently mitigate human-wolf conflicts. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Ali U, 2016, PAK J ZOOL, V48, P861
[2]   Long-distance dispersal of a wolf, Canis lupus, in northwestern Europe [J].
Andersen, Liselotte Wesley ;
Harms, Verena ;
Caniglia, Romolo ;
Czarnomska, Sylwia D. ;
Fabbri, Elena ;
Jedrzejewska, Bogumila ;
Kluth, Gesa ;
Madsen, Aksel Bo ;
Nowak, Carsten ;
Pertoldi, Cino ;
Randi, Ettore ;
Reinhardt, Ilka ;
Stronen, Astrid Vik .
MAMMAL RESEARCH, 2015, 60 (02) :163-168
[3]   Feeding ecology of wolves Canis lupus returning to Germany [J].
Ansorge, H ;
Kluth, G ;
Hahne, S .
ACTA THERIOLOGICA, 2006, 51 (01) :99-106
[4]  
Barnes M., 2015, LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT, P24
[5]   EVALUATION OF WOLF CONTROL TO REDUCE CATTLE PREDATION IN ALBERTA [J].
BJORGE, RR ;
GUNSON, JR .
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1985, 38 (06) :483-487
[6]  
Boitani Luigi, 1995, Canadian Circumpolar Institute Occasional Publication, V35, P3
[7]   Evaluating wolf translocation as a nonlethal method to reduce livestock conflicts in the northwestern United States [J].
Bradley, EH ;
Pletscher, DH ;
Bangs, EE ;
Kunkel, KE ;
Smith, DW ;
Mack, CM ;
Meier, TJ ;
Fontaine, JA ;
Niemeyer, CC ;
Jimenez, MD .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (05) :1498-1508
[8]   Effects of wolf removal on livestock depredation recurrence and wolf recovery in Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming [J].
Bradley, Elizabeth H. ;
Robinson, Hugh S. ;
Bangs, Edward E. ;
Kunkel, Kyran ;
Jimenez, Michael D. ;
Gude, Justin A. ;
Grimm, Todd .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 79 (08) :1337-1346
[9]   Domestic calf mortality and producer detection rates in the Mexican wolf recovery area: Implications for livestock management and carnivore compensation schemes [J].
Breck, Stewart W. ;
Kluever, Bryan M. ;
Panasci, Michael ;
Oakleaf, John ;
Johnson, Terry ;
Ballard, Warren ;
Howery, Larry ;
Bergman, David L. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 144 (02) :930-936
[10]  
Breck SW, 2002, PROC VERTEBR PEST C, P223