An inter-laboratory transfer of a multi-analyte assay between continents

被引:4
作者
Georgiou, Alexandra [1 ]
Dong, Kelly [2 ]
Hughes, Stephen [1 ]
Barfield, Matthew [1 ]
机构
[1] GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Drug Metab & Pharmacokinet, Bioanalyt Sci & Toxicokinet, Ware, Herts, England
[2] GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
CROSS-VALIDATION; TIERED APPROACH;
D O I
10.4155/bio.15.27
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Alex has worked at GlaxoSmithKline for the past 15years and currently works within the bioanalytical and toxicokinetic group in the United Kingdom. Alex's role in previous years has been the in-house support of preclinical and clinical bioanalysis, from method development through to sample analysis activities as well as acting as PI for GLP bioanalysis and toxicokinetics. For the past two years, Alex has applied this analytical and regulatory experience to focus on the outsourcing of preclinical bioanalysis, toxicokinetics and clinical bioanalysis, working closely with multiple bioanalytical and in-life CRO partners worldwide. Alex works to support DMPK and Safety Assessment outsourcing activities for GSK across multiple therapeutic areas, from the first GLP study through to late stage clinical PK studies. Transfer and cross-validation of an existing analytical assay between a laboratory providing current analytical support, and a laboratory needed for new or additional support, can present the bioanalyst with numerous challenges. These challenges can be technical or logistical in nature and may prove to be significant when transferring an assay between laboratories in different continents. Part of GlaxoSmithKline's strategy to improve confidence in providing quality data, is to cross-validate between laboratories. If the cross-validation fails predefined acceptance criteria, then a subsequent investigation would follow. This may also prove to be challenging. The importance of thorough planning and good communication throughout assay transfer, cross-validation and any subsequent investigations is illustrated in this case study.
引用
收藏
页码:825 / 831
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, Bioanalytical method validation guidance for industry
  • [2] [Anonymous], GUID BIOAN METH VAL
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, GUID BIOAN METH VAL
  • [4] Chin R, 2011, GLOBAL CLINICAL TRIALS: EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT, P3, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-381537-8.10001-9
  • [5] MHLW, 2014, GUID BIOAN METH LIG
  • [6] Cross validation in bioanalysis: Why, when and how?
    Muirhead, DC
    Smart, TS
    [J]. CHROMATOGRAPHIA, 2000, 52 (Suppl 1) : S72 - S75
  • [7] Bioanalytical Method Validation—A Revisit with a Decade of Progress
    Vinod P. Shah
    Kamal K. Midha
    John W. A. Findlay
    Howard M. Hill
    James D. Hulse
    Iain J. McGilveray
    Gordon McKay
    Krys J. Miller
    Rabindra N. Patnaik
    Mark L. Powell
    Alfred Tonelli
    C. T. Viswanathan
    Avraham Yacobi
    [J]. Pharmaceutical Research, 2000, 17 (12) : 1551 - 1557
  • [8] Integrating internal and external bioanalytical support to deliver a diversified pharmaceutical portfolio
    Summerfield, Scott G.
    Evans, Christopher
    Spooner, Neil
    Dunn, John A.
    Szapacs, Matthew E.
    Yang, Eric
    [J]. BIOANALYSIS, 2014, 6 (10) : 1311 - 1319
  • [9] Feedback from the European Bioanalysis Forum Workshop: taking tiered approach to the next level
    Timmerman, Philip
    White, Steve
    Knutsson, Magnus
    Kall, Morten Anders
    Fjording, Marianne Scheel
    Smeraglia, John
    McDougall, Stuart
    [J]. BIOANALYSIS, 2014, 6 (19) : 2593 - 2598
  • [10] Tiered approach revisited: introducing stage-appropriate or assay-appropriate scientific validation
    Timmerman, Philip
    [J]. BIOANALYSIS, 2014, 6 (05) : 599 - 604