Population Attributable Risks of Patient, Child and Organizational Risk Factors for Perinatal Mortality in Hospital Births

被引:9
作者
Poeran, Jashvant [1 ]
Borsboom, Gerard J. J. M. [2 ]
de Graaf, Johanna P. [1 ]
Birnie, Erwin [1 ,3 ]
Steegers, Eric A. P. [1 ]
Bonsel, Gouke J. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Obstet & Prenatal Med, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Inst Hlth Policy & Management, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Rotterdam Midwifery Acad, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Perinatal mortality; Netherlands; Population attributable risk; Obstetric care; NETHERLANDS; TERM; FRACTIONS; DELIVERY; OUTCOMES; WEIGHT; FETAL; CARE; AGE;
D O I
10.1007/s10995-014-1562-4
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The main objective of this study was to estimate the contributing role of maternal, child, and organizational risk factors in perinatal mortality by calculating their population attributable risks (PAR). The primary dataset comprised 1,020,749 singleton hospital births from a parts per thousand yen22 weeks' gestation (The Netherlands Perinatal Registry 2000-2008). PARs for single and grouped risk factors were estimated in four stages: (1) creating a duplicate dataset for each PAR analysis in which risk factors of interest were set to the most favorable value (e.g., all women assigned 'Western' for PAR calculation of ethnicity); (2) in the primary dataset an elaborate multilevel logistic regression model was fitted from which (3) the obtained coefficients were used to predict perinatal mortality in each duplicate dataset; (4) PARs were then estimated as the proportional change of predicted- compared to observed perinatal mortality. Additionally, PARs for grouped risk factors were estimated by using sequential values in two orders: after PAR estimation of grouped maternal risk factors, the resulting PARs for grouped child, and grouped organizational factors were estimated, and vice versa. The combined PAR of maternal, child and organizational factors is 94.4 %, i.e., when all factors are set to the most favorable value perinatal mortality is expected to be reduced with 94.4 %. Depending on the order of analysis, the PAR of maternal risk factors varies from 1.4 to 13.1 %, and for child- and organizational factors 58.7-74.0 and 7.3-34.3 %, respectively. In conclusion, the PAR of maternal-, child- and organizational factors combined is 94.4 %. Optimization of organizational factors may achieve a 34.3 % decrease in perinatal mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:764 / 775
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   STRATEGIES FOR COMMUNITY-HEALTH INTERVENTION - PROMISES, PARADOXES, PITFALLS [J].
ALTMAN, DG .
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 1995, 57 (03) :226-233
[2]  
Andres R L, 2000, Semin Neonatol, V5, P231, DOI 10.1053/siny.2000.0025
[3]  
[Anonymous], EUR PER HLTH REP HLT
[4]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U UTRECHT
[5]  
[Anonymous], PER CAR NETH 2008
[6]   Do differences in maternal age, parity and multiple births explain variations in fetal and neonatal mortality rates in Europe? - Results from the EURO-PERISTAT project [J].
Anthony, Sabine ;
Jacobusse, Gert W. ;
van der Pal-de Bruin, Karin M. ;
Buitendijk, Simone ;
Zeitlin, Jennifer .
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 23 (04) :292-300
[7]   A review of adjusted estimators of attributable risk [J].
Benichou, J .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (03) :195-216
[8]  
Buitendijk S E, 2004, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V148, P1855
[9]   Causes of Death Among Stillbirths [J].
Bukowski, Radek ;
Carpenter, Marshall ;
Conway, Deborah ;
Coustan, Donald ;
Dudley, Donald J. ;
Goldenberg, Robert L. ;
Hogue, Carol J. Rowland ;
Koch, Matthew A. ;
Parker, Corette B. ;
Pinar, Halit ;
Reddy, Uma M. ;
Saade, George R. ;
Silver, Robert M. ;
Stoll, Barbara J. ;
Varner, Michael W. ;
Willinger, Marian .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 306 (22) :2459-2468
[10]   Principal component analysis is a powerful instrument in occupational hygiene inquiries [J].
Burstyn, I .
ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 2004, 48 (08) :655-661