Questionnaire Measures and Physiological Correlates of Presence: A Systematic Review

被引:105
作者
Grassini, Simone [1 ]
Laumann, Karin [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Psychol, Trondheim, Norway
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2020年 / 11卷
关键词
virtual environment; presence; immersion; physiology; review; VIRTUAL-REALITY; SKIN TEMPERATURE; VISUAL AWARENESS; SPATIAL PRESENCE; DEFAULT MODE; ENVIRONMENTS; EXPERIENCE; BRAIN; SENSE; EEG;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00349
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The published literature has produced several definitions for the sense of presence in a simulated environment, as well as various methods for measuring it. The variety of conceptualizations makes it difficult for researchers to interpret, compare, and evaluate the presence ratings obtained from individual studies. Presence has been measured by employing questionnaires, physiological indices, behavioral feedbacks, and interviews. A systematic literature review was conducted to provide insight into the definitions and measurements of presence in studies from 2002 to 2019, with a focus on questionnaires and physiological measures. The review showed that scholars had introduced various definitions of presence that often originate from different theoretical standpoints and that this has produced a multitude of different questionnaires that aim to measure presence. At the same time, physiological studies that investigate the physiological correlates of the sense of presence have often shown ambiguous results or have not been replicated. Most of the scholars have preferred the use of questionnaires, with Witmer and Singer's Presence Questionnaire being the most prevalent. Among the physiological measures, electroencephalography was the most frequently used. The conclusions of the present review aim to stimulate future structured efforts to standardize the use of the construct of presence, as well as inspire the replication of the findings reported in the published literature.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 138 条
  • [1] Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage
    Agarwal, R
    Karahanna, E
    [J]. MIS QUARTERLY, 2000, 24 (04) : 665 - 694
  • [2] Amin Ashfaq, 2016, Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. 8th International Conference, VAMR 2016, held as part of HCI International 2016. Proceedings: LNCS 9740, P269, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39907-2_25
  • [3] Relaxation with Immersive Natural Scenes Presented Using Virtual Reality
    Anderson, Allison P.
    Mayer, Michael D.
    Fellows, Abigail M.
    Cowan, Devin R.
    Hegel, Mark T.
    Buckey, Jay C.
    [J]. AEROSPACE MEDICINE AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2017, 88 (06) : 520 - 526
  • [4] Andreassi J.L., 2006, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY HUM, V5th, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203880340
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2014, TOO MANY QUESTIONNAI
  • [6] Arndt S., 2016, SOC IMAGING SCI TECH, V2016, P1, DOI [10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2016.16.HVEI-125, DOI 10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2016.16.HVEI-125]
  • [7] Validation of the Emotiv EPOC® EEG gaming systemfor measuring research quality auditory ERPs
    Badcock, Nicholas A.
    Mousikou, Petroula
    Mahajan, Yatin
    de Lissa, Peter
    Thie, Johnson
    McArthur, Genevieve
    [J]. PEERJ, 2013, 1
  • [8] Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments
    Bailenson, JN
    Blascovich, J
    Beall, AC
    Loomis, JM
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2003, 29 (07) : 819 - 833
  • [9] Presence and emotions in virtual environments:: The influence of stereoscopy
    Banos, Rosa M.
    Botella, Cristina
    Rubio, Isabel
    Quero, Soledad
    Garcia-Palacios, Azucena
    Alcaniz, Mariano
    [J]. CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2008, 11 (01): : 1 - 8
  • [10] Baren J. V., 2004, IST200139237 OMNIPRE