A social license to operate for aquaculture: Reflections from Tasmania

被引:25
作者
Alexander, Karen A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Marine Socioecol, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Inst Marine & Antarctic Studies, Private Bag 49, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia
关键词
Social license; Aquaculture; Social acceptance; Governance; Sustainability; SALMON AQUACULTURE; GAS DEVELOPMENT; COMMUNITY; LEGITIMACY; SUSTAINABILITY; GOVERNANCE; MODEL; TRUST; RISK; MINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737875
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
'Social License to Operate' (SLO) is now a key term in natural resource development vocabulary across the world. Like industries such as mining, forestry and renewable energy, the concept is increasingly found across aquaculture research, policy, and activism. As a state in which SLO has been well-studied but is also continuing to be questioned, Tasmania constitutes a useful case study to investigate the concept and to reflect on the lessons learnt for the state and more broadly. Using a desk-based thematic analysis of scholarly literature and grey literature from industry, government and NGOs, this study shows that aquaculture SLO in Tasmania depends on messaging and perceptions of benefits, sustainability, and procedural fairness as well as historical, international, national, and local industry context and the trustworthiness of a broad range of actors. If SLO for aquaculture is to be achieved and maintained, industry and government messaging should focus on a broader range of factors than only benefits for jobs and economy and environmental sustainability - as is often the focus.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Fostering the social license to operate: An integrative framework of organizational antecedents [J].
Baba, Sofiane ;
Mercier, Naoko ;
Guesthier, Andre-Anne .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2024, 89
[22]   The fish scales of justice: the influence of perceived justice on social license to operate for aquaculture development [J].
Rickard, Laura N. ;
Deline, Mary Beth ;
Smith, Nathan .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2024, 27 (02) :185-218
[23]   Social license to operate: Legitimacy by another name? [J].
Gehman, Joel ;
Lefsrud, Lianne M. ;
Fast, Stewart .
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA, 2017, 60 (02) :293-317
[24]   Science and Social License: Defining Environmental Sustainability of Atlantic Salmon Aquaculture in South-Eastern Tasmania, Australia [J].
Leith, Peat ;
Ogier, Emily ;
Haward, Marcus .
SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2014, 28 (3-4) :277-296
[25]   Social acceptance of NIMBY facilities: A comparative study between public acceptance and the social license to operate analytical frameworks [J].
Xu, Min ;
Liu, Yong ;
Cui, Caiyun ;
Xia, Bo ;
Ke, Yongjian ;
Skitmore, Martin .
LAND USE POLICY, 2023, 124
[26]   A Systems-Based Conceptual Framework for Assessing the Determinants of a Social License to Operate in the Mining Industry [J].
Prno, Jason ;
Slocombe, D. Scott .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 53 (03) :672-689
[27]   Working the ground game: How Maine shellfish and seaweed farmers are building social license to operate [J].
Whitmore, Emily ;
Davis, Christopher ;
Safford, Thomas .
AQUACULTURE, 2025, 596
[28]   Pinning down the social license to operate (SLO): The problem of normative complexity [J].
Brueckner, Martin ;
Eabrasu, Marian .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2018, 59 :217-226
[29]   Social license to operate: Not a proxy for accountability in water governance [J].
Overduin, Natasha ;
Moore, Michele-Lee .
GEOFORUM, 2017, 85 :72-81
[30]   Social license to operate: an institutional critique and research framework [J].
Glückler, Johannes ;
Gutiérrez, Denise .
Resources Policy, 2025, 107