A social license to operate for aquaculture: Reflections from Tasmania

被引:19
作者
Alexander, Karen A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Marine Socioecol, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Inst Marine & Antarctic Studies, Private Bag 49, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia
关键词
Social license; Aquaculture; Social acceptance; Governance; Sustainability; SALMON AQUACULTURE; GAS DEVELOPMENT; COMMUNITY; LEGITIMACY; SUSTAINABILITY; GOVERNANCE; MODEL; TRUST; RISK; MINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737875
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
'Social License to Operate' (SLO) is now a key term in natural resource development vocabulary across the world. Like industries such as mining, forestry and renewable energy, the concept is increasingly found across aquaculture research, policy, and activism. As a state in which SLO has been well-studied but is also continuing to be questioned, Tasmania constitutes a useful case study to investigate the concept and to reflect on the lessons learnt for the state and more broadly. Using a desk-based thematic analysis of scholarly literature and grey literature from industry, government and NGOs, this study shows that aquaculture SLO in Tasmania depends on messaging and perceptions of benefits, sustainability, and procedural fairness as well as historical, international, national, and local industry context and the trustworthiness of a broad range of actors. If SLO for aquaculture is to be achieved and maintained, industry and government messaging should focus on a broader range of factors than only benefits for jobs and economy and environmental sustainability - as is often the focus.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The fish scales of justice: the influence of perceived justice on social license to operate for aquaculture development
    Rickard, Laura N.
    Deline, Mary Beth
    Smith, Nathan
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2024, 27 (02) : 185 - 218
  • [22] Social license to operate: Legitimacy by another name?
    Gehman, Joel
    Lefsrud, Lianne M.
    Fast, Stewart
    CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA, 2017, 60 (02): : 293 - 317
  • [23] Science and Social License: Defining Environmental Sustainability of Atlantic Salmon Aquaculture in South-Eastern Tasmania, Australia
    Leith, Peat
    Ogier, Emily
    Haward, Marcus
    SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2014, 28 (3-4) : 277 - 296
  • [24] Social acceptance of NIMBY facilities: A comparative study between public acceptance and the social license to operate analytical frameworks
    Xu, Min
    Liu, Yong
    Cui, Caiyun
    Xia, Bo
    Ke, Yongjian
    Skitmore, Martin
    LAND USE POLICY, 2023, 124
  • [25] A Systems-Based Conceptual Framework for Assessing the Determinants of a Social License to Operate in the Mining Industry
    Prno, Jason
    Slocombe, D. Scott
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 53 (03) : 672 - 689
  • [26] Working the ground game: How Maine shellfish and seaweed farmers are building social license to operate
    Whitmore, Emily
    Davis, Christopher
    Safford, Thomas
    AQUACULTURE, 2025, 596
  • [27] Pinning down the social license to operate (SLO): The problem of normative complexity
    Brueckner, Martin
    Eabrasu, Marian
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2018, 59 : 217 - 226
  • [28] Social license to operate: Not a proxy for accountability in water governance
    Overduin, Natasha
    Moore, Michele-Lee
    GEOFORUM, 2017, 85 : 72 - 81
  • [29] Social license to operate in the mining industry: the case of Peru
    Sicoli Posleman, Claudia
    Sallan, Jose M.
    IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2019, 37 (06) : 480 - 490
  • [30] Using public comments to gauge social licence to operate, for finfish aquaculture: Lessons from Scotland
    Billing, Suzannah-Lynn
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 165 : 401 - 415