Performance limit analysis for common roadside and median barriers using LS-DYNA

被引:27
|
作者
Ferdous, M. R. [1 ]
Abu-Odeh, Akram [1 ]
Bligh, Roger P. [1 ]
Jones, Harry L. [2 ]
Sheikh, Nauman M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Texas Transportat Inst, Roadside Safety & Secur Div, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Zachry Dept Civil Engn, College Stn, TX USA
关键词
guardrail performance limit; LS-DYNA simulation; NCHRP Report 350; guardrail on slope;
D O I
10.1080/13588265.2011.623023
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Performance limits of commonly used barriers in terms of acceptable vehicle impact heights were identified using non-linear finite element methodology. Finite element models for four widely used guardrail systems were developed. The selected guardrail/barrier systems are the modified G4(1S) W-beam guardrail, modified thrie-beam guardrail, Midwest guardrail system, and modified weak post W-beam guardrail. LS-DYNA simulations using these guardrail models were validated based on the results obtained from existing crash tests performed on flat terrain. To define vehicle containment limits, LS-DYNA simulations were performed with variable vehicle-to-barrier impact heights on guardrails placed on flat terrain. Override and underride limits for each guardrail model were identified using NCHRP Report 350 design vehicles. Vehicle impact height was parametrically varied to determine performance limits of each barrier as defined by initiation of override or rollover for the pickup truck and underride for the small passenger car.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 706
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Temperature Distribution Curve Analysis on Concrete through LS-DYNA
    Oli, Topendra
    Ha, Dongsoo
    Jang, Taejin
    Park, Cheolwoo
    Kim, Gihyun
    Kim, Seungwon
    FIRE-SWITZERLAND, 2024, 7 (01):
  • [22] FSI ANALYSIS WITH CONTINUOUS FLUID FLOW USING FEM AND SPH METHODS IN LS-DYNA
    Topalovic, Marko
    Nikolic, Aleksandar
    Vulovic, Snezana
    Milovanovic, Vladimir P.
    JOURNAL OF THE SERBIAN SOCIETY FOR COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2021, 15 (02) : 93 - 100
  • [23] Robustness analysis with LS-OPT® and LS-DYNA® for sheet metal forming simulations
    Merten, M.
    Liebold, K.
    Haufe, A.
    INTERNATIONAL DEEP-DRAWING RESEARCH GROUP CONFERENCE (IDDRG 2021), 2021, 1157
  • [24] Fujitsu's Activities in Improving Performance of LS-DYNA Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis Software
    Kondo, Kenshiro
    FUJITSU SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 48 (03): : 375 - 383
  • [25] RF-DYNA - Software for optimized random finite element simulation using LS-DYNA
    Hassan, Adam
    Oudah, Fadi
    ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2024, 196
  • [26] Accuracy analysis of a guardrail impact simulation based on ANSYS/LS-DYNA
    Research Institute of Structural Engineering and Disaster Reduction, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    J Vib Shock, 2008, 4 (147-152+163):
  • [27] Research on dynamic analysis of pod vibration based on ANSYS/LS-DYNA
    Jiang, Jinyu
    Li, Shiming
    ADVANCES IN ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2016, : 375 - 378
  • [28] Simulation Analysis of Crash Tests for the Front Side Member in LS-DYNA
    Yin, Hui Jun
    Jin, Jian
    Yang, Ping Hui
    Pan, Yu
    Ma, Shu Kun
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL DESIGN, PTS 1 AND 2, 2011, 199-200 : 1200 - 1205
  • [29] Study of dynamic properties on NMMCs material using Ansys/LS-DYNA
    Liang, Li
    Li, Ming.
    Tsai, C. T.
    STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND FAILURE, 2008, 41-42 : 61 - +
  • [30] Finite element analysis of metal cutting process based on LS-DYNA
    School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China
    Dongbei Daxue Xuebao, 2008, 9 (1334-1337):