High-performance GPU-based rendering for real-time, rigid 2D/3D-image registration and motion prediction in radiation oncology

被引:19
|
作者
Spoerk, Jakob [1 ]
Gendrin, Christelle [1 ]
Weber, Christoph [1 ]
Figl, Michael [1 ]
Pawiro, Supriyanto Ardjo [1 ]
Furtado, Hugo [1 ]
Fabri, Daniella [1 ]
Bloch, Christoph [1 ]
Bergmann, Helmar [1 ]
Groeller, Eduard [2 ]
Birkfellner, Wolfgang [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Ctr Med Phys & Biomed Engn, Vienna, Austria
[2] Vienna Univ Technol, Inst Comp Graph & Algorithms, Vienna, Austria
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK | 2012年 / 22卷 / 01期
关键词
2D/3D-Registration; DRR; real-time; sparse sampling; IMAGE-GUIDED IMRT; STANDARD DATA SET; 2D/3D REGISTRATION; DEFORMABLE REGISTRATION; SIMILARITY MEASURES; CANCER TREATMENT; THERAPY; CT; RADIOTHERAPY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.zemedi.2011.06.002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A common problem in image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of lung cancer as well as other malignant diseases is the compensation of periodic and aperiodic motion during dose delivety. Modern systems for image-guided radiation oncology allow for the acquisition of cone-beam computed tomography data in the treatment room as well as the acquisition of planar radiographs during the treatment. A mid-term research goal is the compensation of tumor target volume motion by 2D/3D registration. In 2D/3D registration, spatial information on organ location is derived by an iterative comparison of perspective volume renderings, so-called digitally rendered radiographs (DRR) from computed tomography volume data, and planar reference x-rays. Currently, this rendering process is very time consuming, and real-time registration, which should at least provide data on organ position in less than a second, has not come into existence. We present two GPU-based rendering algorithms which generate a DRR of 512 x 512 pixels size from a CT dataset of 53 MB size at a pace of almost 100 Hz. This rendering rate is feasible by applying a number of algorithmic simplifications which range from alternative volume-driven rendering approaches namely so-called wobbled splatting to sub-sampling of the DRR-image by means of specialized raycasting techniques. Furthermore, general purpose graphics processing unit (GPGPU) programming paradigms were consequently utilized. Rendering quality and performance as well as the influence on the quality and performance of the overall registration process were measured and analyzed in detail. The results show that both methods are competitive and pave the way for fast motion compensation by rigid and possibly even non-rigid 2D/3D registration and, beyond that, adaptive filtering of motion models in IGRT.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 20
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [21] A computerized framework for monitoring four-dimensional dose distributions during stereotactic body radiation therapy using a portal dose image-based 2D/3D registration approach
    Nakamoto, Takahiro
    Arimura, Hidetaka
    Nakamura, Katsumasa
    Shioyama, Yoshiyuki
    Mizoguchi, Asumi
    Hirose, Taka-aki
    Honda, Hiroshi
    Umezu, Yoshiyuki
    Nakamura, Yasuhiko
    Hirata, Hideki
    COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 2015, 40 : 1 - 12
  • [22] Real-time 3D ultrasound based motion tracking for the treatment of mobile organs with MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound
    Bour, Pierre
    Ozenne, Valery
    Marquet, Fabrice
    de Senneville, Baudouin Denis
    Dumont, Erik
    Quesson, Bruno
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 2018, 34 (08) : 1225 - 1235
  • [23] Real-Time 3D Image Guidance Using a Standard LINAC: Measured Motion, Accuracy, and Precision of the First Prospective Clinical Trial of Kilovoltage Intrafraction Monitoring-Guided Gating for Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy
    Keall, Paul J.
    Ng, Jin Aun
    Juneja, Prabhjot
    O'Brien, Ricky T.
    Huang, Chen-Yu
    Colvill, Emma
    Caillet, Vincent
    Simpson, Emma
    Poulsen, Per R.
    Kneebone, Andrew
    Eade, Thomas
    Booth, Jeremy T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 94 (05): : 1015 - 1021