Life cycle and energy performance assessment of three wall types in south-eastern Europe region

被引:25
作者
Maodus, Nikola [1 ]
Agarski, Boris [1 ]
Misulic, Tatjana Kocetov [1 ]
Budak, Igor [1 ]
Radeka, Miroslava [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Novi Sad, Fac Tech Sci, Trg Dositeja Obradov 6, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
关键词
Wall type; Energy-efficiency; Life cycle assessment; Light timber frame; Aerated autoclaved concrete; Masonry brick; GREENHOUSE-GAS; CONSTRUCTION; BUILDINGS; WOOD; CARBON; OPTIMIZATION; EMISSIONS; CONCRETE; SECTOR; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.10.014
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Energy-efficient buildings, made of ecologically acceptable materials, are result of a worldwide ecological awareness induced by ever growing concern in regard to climate changes and economic aspects of long term energy savings. Complexities regarding energy-efficiency, economy and traditional construction of residential family homes led to acceptance of new building materials and forming of several typical wall types in south-eastern European region. This paper offers an energy performance analysis and a life cycle assessment of three common outer wall types: prefabricated timber-frame, an aerated autoclaved concrete and a solid brick wall with two model heating regimes. In order to verify energy and environmental performance of each wall type in a complete building, a detached house model was determined with the same parameters used for comparison. Model performances were determined for the selected life cycle stages and system boundaries during an eighty year period taken as a service life of family houses and compared to conventional and passive houses performances found in literature. Analysis results show that the model with aerated autoclaved concrete wall has the best environmental performance and that model with masonry brick walls has the best thermal performance in discontinuous heating mode of the three analysed walls. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 614
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Adalberth K., 2001, INT J LOW ENERGY SUS, V2
  • [2] Adalberth Karin., 2000, ENERGY USE ENV IMPAC
  • [3] Fuzzy multi-criteria-based impact category weighting in life cycle assessment
    Agarski, Boris
    Budak, Igor
    Vukelic, Djordje
    Hodolic, Janko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 3256 - 3266
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, 17452009 SRPS EN ISO, P52
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, 137902010 SRPS EN IS, P175
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2011, 137882011 SRPS EN IS, V38
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2008, ENERGY EFFICIENCY RE
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2010, 152432010 SRPS EN IS, P155
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2011, REPUBLIC SERBIA MINI, P46
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2013, 137892013 SRPS EN IS, P24