Prospective impact of tumor grade assessment in biopsies on tumor stage and prognostic grouping in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma Relevance of the Seventh Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual Revision

被引:13
作者
Dikken, Johan L. [2 ,3 ]
Coit, Daniel G. [2 ]
Klimstra, David S. [1 ]
Rizk, Nabil P. [2 ]
van Grieken, Nicole [4 ]
Ilson, David [5 ]
Tang, Laura H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10022 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10022 USA
[3] Leiden Univ, Dept Surg, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, New York, NY 10022 USA
关键词
gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma; American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system; seventh edition; gastroesophageal junction tumor grade; gastroesophageal junction tumor stage; gastroesophageal junction biopsy; ESOPHAGEAL-CARCINOMA; CANCER/INTERNATIONAL-UNION; RESECTION MARGIN; SURVIVAL; SURGERY; CLASSIFICATION; INVOLVEMENT; RECURRENCE; PATTERN; JUNCTION;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.26301
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: In the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for esophageal cancer, tumor grade was introduced as an independent determinant of stage grouping in early stage tumors. With the significantly lower prognosis for poorly differentiated early stage adenocarcinomas, patients with these tumors may become candidates for neoadjuvant therapy given an accurate identification of these tumors with preoperative staging. The objective of the current study was to investigate the accuracy of preoperative histopathologic grading and the effect of preoperative grade on tumor stage/prognostic grouping. METHODS: Preoperative tumor grade was compared with postoperative tumor grade in 427 patients who underwent surgery without receiving neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. The impact of preoperative tumor grade on stage/prognostic grouping was investigated. RESULTS: The overall accuracy of preoperative tumor grade assessment was 76% when unknown differentiation was regarded as well/moderately differentiated as recommended by the AJCC, whereas accuracy was 73% after the exclusion of tumors with unknown grade. In patients who have tumors classified as T1 or T2 and lymph node-negative (NO) (T1-T2NO) disease, 16% were assigned to a lower stage group based on preoperative pathology, whereas 5% were assigned to a higher stage group. In the T1-T2NO group, sensitivity for detecting a poorly differentiated tumor was 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.56), whereas specificity was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: With increasing use of neoadjuvant therapy, the accuracy of preoperative biopsy assessment has become increasingly important. In the current study, the accuracy of preoperative tumor grade assessment was 73%, leading to changes in AJCC stage/ prognostic group in 21% of patients with T1-T2N0 esophageal adenocarcinomas. The authors concluded that caution should be exhibited in staging patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma based on preoperative biopsy data. Cancer 2012; 118: 349-57. (C) 2011 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 357
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [11] Greene F., 2002, AJCC cancer staging handbook: From the AJCC cancer staging manual, V6th
  • [12] Pathological determinants of survival in node-negative oesophageal cancer
    Khan, OA
    Alexiou, C
    Soomro, I
    Duffy, JP
    Morgan, WE
    Beggs, FD
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 91 (12) : 1586 - 1591
  • [13] Proposed revision of the staging classification for esophageal cancer
    Korst, RJ
    Rusch, VW
    Venkatraman, E
    Bains, MS
    Burt, ME
    Downey, RJ
    Ginsberg, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 115 (03) : 660 - 669
  • [14] MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA
    LANDIS, JR
    KOCH, GG
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) : 159 - 174
  • [15] The influence of perioperative blood transfusion on survival after esophageal resection for carcinoma
    Langley, SM
    Alexiou, C
    Bailey, DH
    Weeden, DF
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2002, 73 (06) : 1704 - 1709
  • [16] Mariette C, 2010, J CLIN ONCOL, V28
  • [17] Pattern of recurrence following complete resection of esophageal carcinoma and factors predictive of recurrent disease
    Mariette, C
    Balon, JM
    Piessen, G
    Fabre, S
    Van Seuningen, I
    Triboulet, JP
    [J]. CANCER, 2003, 97 (07) : 1616 - 1623
  • [18] SURGICAL PATHOLOGY OF ADENOCARCINOMA ARISING IN BARRETTS-ESOPHAGUS - ANALYSIS OF 67 CASES
    PARAF, F
    FLEJOU, JF
    PIGNON, JP
    FEKETE, F
    POTET, F
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1995, 19 (02) : 183 - 191
  • [19] Cancer of the Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction Data-Driven Staging for the Seventh Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Cancer Staging Manuals
    Rice, Thomas W.
    Rusch, Valerie W.
    Ishwaran, Hemant
    Blackstone, Eugene H.
    [J]. CANCER, 2010, 116 (16) : 3763 - 3773
  • [20] A cancer staging primer: Esophagus and esophagogastric junction
    Rice, Thomas W.
    Blackstone, Eugene H.
    Rusch, Valerie W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 139 (03) : 527 - 529