Prospective impact of tumor grade assessment in biopsies on tumor stage and prognostic grouping in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma Relevance of the Seventh Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual Revision

被引:13
作者
Dikken, Johan L. [2 ,3 ]
Coit, Daniel G. [2 ]
Klimstra, David S. [1 ]
Rizk, Nabil P. [2 ]
van Grieken, Nicole [4 ]
Ilson, David [5 ]
Tang, Laura H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10022 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10022 USA
[3] Leiden Univ, Dept Surg, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, New York, NY 10022 USA
关键词
gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma; American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system; seventh edition; gastroesophageal junction tumor grade; gastroesophageal junction tumor stage; gastroesophageal junction biopsy; ESOPHAGEAL-CARCINOMA; CANCER/INTERNATIONAL-UNION; RESECTION MARGIN; SURVIVAL; SURGERY; CLASSIFICATION; INVOLVEMENT; RECURRENCE; PATTERN; JUNCTION;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.26301
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: In the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for esophageal cancer, tumor grade was introduced as an independent determinant of stage grouping in early stage tumors. With the significantly lower prognosis for poorly differentiated early stage adenocarcinomas, patients with these tumors may become candidates for neoadjuvant therapy given an accurate identification of these tumors with preoperative staging. The objective of the current study was to investigate the accuracy of preoperative histopathologic grading and the effect of preoperative grade on tumor stage/prognostic grouping. METHODS: Preoperative tumor grade was compared with postoperative tumor grade in 427 patients who underwent surgery without receiving neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. The impact of preoperative tumor grade on stage/prognostic grouping was investigated. RESULTS: The overall accuracy of preoperative tumor grade assessment was 76% when unknown differentiation was regarded as well/moderately differentiated as recommended by the AJCC, whereas accuracy was 73% after the exclusion of tumors with unknown grade. In patients who have tumors classified as T1 or T2 and lymph node-negative (NO) (T1-T2NO) disease, 16% were assigned to a lower stage group based on preoperative pathology, whereas 5% were assigned to a higher stage group. In the T1-T2NO group, sensitivity for detecting a poorly differentiated tumor was 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.56), whereas specificity was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: With increasing use of neoadjuvant therapy, the accuracy of preoperative biopsy assessment has become increasingly important. In the current study, the accuracy of preoperative tumor grade assessment was 73%, leading to changes in AJCC stage/ prognostic group in 21% of patients with T1-T2N0 esophageal adenocarcinomas. The authors concluded that caution should be exhibited in staging patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma based on preoperative biopsy data. Cancer 2012; 118: 349-57. (C) 2011 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 357
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction - Influence of esophageal resection margin and operative approach on outcome
    Barbour, Andrew P.
    Rizk, Nabil P.
    Gonen, Mithat
    Tang, Laura
    Bains, Manjit S.
    Rusch, Valerie W.
    Coit, Daniel G.
    Brennan, Murray F.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 246 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [2] Staging of esophageal carcinoma:: Length of tumor and number of involved regional lymph nodes.: Are these independent prognostic factors?
    Bollschweiler, Elfriede
    Baldus, Stephan E.
    Schroeder, Wolfgang
    Schneider, Paul M.
    Hoelscher, Arnulf H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 94 (05) : 355 - 363
  • [3] Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer
    Cunningham, David
    Allum, William H.
    Stenning, Sally P.
    Thompson, Jeremy N.
    Van de Velde, Cornelis J. H.
    Nicolson, Marianne
    Scarffe, J. Howard
    Lofts, Fiona J.
    Falk, Stephen J.
    Iveson, Timothy J.
    Smith, David B.
    Langley, Ruth E.
    Verma, Monica
    Weeden, Simon
    Chua, Yu Jo
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (01) : 11 - 20
  • [4] Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement Is a Negative Prognostic Factor After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer
    D'Journo, Xavier Benoit
    Avaro, Jean Philippe
    Michelet, Pierre
    Trousse, Delphine
    Tasei, Anne Marie
    Dahan, Laetitia
    Doddoli, Christophe
    Guidicelli, Roger
    Fuentes, Pierre
    Seitz, Jean Francois
    Thomas, Pascal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 4 (04) : 534 - 539
  • [5] Pattern of recurrence after surgery in adenocarcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction
    de Manzoni, G
    Pedrazzani, C
    Pasini, F
    Durante, E
    Gabbani, M
    Grandinetti, A
    Guglielmi, A
    Griso, C
    Cordiano, C
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 29 (06): : 506 - 510
  • [6] Circumferential resection margin involvement: an independent predictor of survival following surgery for oesophageal cancer
    Dexter, SPL
    Sue-Ling, H
    McMahon, MJ
    Quirke, P
    Mapstone, N
    Martin, IG
    [J]. GUT, 2001, 48 (05) : 667 - 670
  • [7] Dickson GH, 2001, EUR J SURG ONCOL, V27, P641
  • [8] Edge S.B., 2010, AJCC cancer staging manual, V649
  • [9] Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the US - The importance of tumor length and lymph node status
    Eloubeidi, MA
    Desmond, R
    Arguedas, MR
    Reed, CE
    Wilcox, CM
    [J]. CANCER, 2002, 95 (07) : 1434 - 1443
  • [10] The process for continuous improvement of the TNM classification
    Gospodarowicz, MK
    Miller, D
    Groome, PA
    Greene, FL
    Logan, PA
    Sobin, LH
    [J]. CANCER, 2004, 100 (01) : 1 - 5