Fast Inversion of Subsurface Target Electromagnetic Induction Response With Deep Learning

被引:6
作者
Li, Shiyan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Xiaojuan [1 ,2 ]
Xing, Kang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zheng, Yaoxin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Aerosp Informat Res Inst, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Electromagnet Radiat & Sensing Technol, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Elect Elect & Commun Engn, Beijing 100039, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Training; Electromagnetic interference; Three-dimensional displays; Data models; Deep learning; Neurons; Computer architecture; 3-D orthogonal magnetic dipole; deep neural network (DNN); electromagnetic induction (EMI) inversion; subsurface target detection;
D O I
10.1109/LGRS.2022.3159269
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
With the development of electromagnetic detection technology, the inversion of electromagnetic induction (EMI) response based on a 3-D orthogonal dipole model can provide an estimation of parameters of a high-conductivity target, such as the target's position, orientation, and shape. However, the traditional inversion methods suffer from several limitations including relying on the initial value, easy to fall into the local optimal solution, and high computational complexity. To overcome these disadvantages, in this letter, we propose a deep learning (DL) inversion method of subsurface target EMI response based on deep neural network (DNN) architecture, which is combined with adaptive moment estimation (Adam) optimization algorithm and learning rate attenuation strategy to improve the model accuracy. Datasets are obtained from forward modeling in different target parameters. By limiting the range of target parameters, errors caused by the nonuniqueness of inversion results are avoided. Through simulation and field experiments, we verify the performance of this method. The experimental results show that compared with the traditional inversion algorithms, the inversion accuracy is higher and the inversion speed is three to four orders of magnitude faster.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Subsurface discrimination using electromagnetic induction sensors [J].
Bell, TH ;
Barrow, BJ ;
Miller, JT .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2001, 39 (06) :1286-1293
[2]   Subsurface electromagnetic induction imaging for unexploded ordnance detection [J].
Grzegorczyk, Tomasz M. ;
Fernandez, Juan Pablo ;
Shubitidze, Fridon ;
O'Neill, Kevin ;
Barrowes, Benjamin E. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2012, 79 :38-45
[3]   Characterization of UXO-Like targets using broadband electromagnetic induction sensors [J].
Huang, HP ;
Won, IJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 41 (03) :652-663
[4]  
King DB, 2015, ACS SYM SER, V1214, P1, DOI 10.1021/bk-2015-1214.ch001
[5]  
Loshchilov I., 2017, P 5 INT C LEARN REPR, P1769
[6]   MAPPING OF SUBSOIL WATER LEVEL AND ITS IMPACTS ON HAWARA ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE BY TRANSIENT AND MULTI FREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY [J].
Massoud, Usama ;
Abbas, A. M. ;
Mesbah, H. S. A. ;
Ragab, El Said A. ;
Taha, Ayman .
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2010, 53 (03) :638-645
[7]  
Pasion L., 2001, J ENVIRON ENG GEOPH, V6, P91
[8]   Deep learning electromagnetic inversion with convolutional neural networks [J].
Puzyrev, Vladimir .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 218 (02) :817-832
[9]   A deep learning approach to the inversion of borehole resistivity measurements [J].
Shahriari, M. ;
Pardo, D. ;
Picon, A. ;
Galdran, A. ;
Del Ser, J. ;
Torres-Verdin, C. .
COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2020, 24 (03) :971-994
[10]   Comparison of the physically complete model with a simple dipole model for UXO detection and discrimination [J].
Shubitidze, F. ;
Fernandez, J. P. ;
Barrowes, B. E. ;
O'Neill, K. ;
Shamatava, I. ;
Bijamov, A. .
DETECTION AND SENSING OF MINES, EXPLOSIVE OBJECTS, AND OBSCURED TARGETS XV, 2010, 7664