Assessing an Interactive Online Tool to Support Parents' Genomic Testing Decisions

被引:30
作者
Adam, Shelin [1 ]
Birch, Patricia H. [1 ]
Coe, Rachel R. [1 ]
Bansback, Nick [2 ]
Jones, Adrian L. [3 ]
Connolly, Mary B. [4 ]
Demos, Michelle K. [4 ]
Toyota, Eric B. [4 ]
Farrer, Matthew J. [5 ]
Friedman, Jan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Med Genet, Box 153,4500 Oak St, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Stat, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Dept Neurol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Dept Med Genet, Djavad Mowafaghian Ctr, CAN, Vancouver, BC, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Decision aid; Decisional support; Genetic counseling; Genomic testing decisions; Patient-empowerment; Patient knowledge; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; RECOMMENDATIONS; EMPOWERMENT; VALIDATION; AID;
D O I
10.1007/s10897-018-0281-1
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Clinical use of genome-wide sequencing (GWS) requires pre-test genetic counseling, but the availability of genetic counseling is limited. We developed an interactive online decision-support tool, DECIDE, to make genetic counseling, patient education, and decision support more readily available. We performed a non-inferiority trial comparing DECIDE to standard genetic counseling to assess the clinical value of DECIDE for pre-GWS counseling. One hundred and six parents considering GWS for their children with epilepsy were randomized to conventional genetic counseling or DECIDE. Following the intervention, we measured parents' knowledge and empowerment and asked their opinions about using DECIDE. Both DECIDE and conventional genetic counseling significantly increased parents' knowledge, with no difference between groups. Empowerment also increased but by less than 2% in each group. Parents liked using DECIDE and found it useful; 81% would recommend it to others; 49% wished to use it along with a genetic counselor; 26% of parents preferred to see a genetic counselor; 7% preferred DECIDE alone; and 18% had no preference. DECIDE appears equivalent to genetic counseling at conveying information. In addition, it was highly acceptable to the majority of study participants, many of whom indicated that it was useful to their decision-making. Use of DECIDE as a pre-test tool may extend genetic counseling resources.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 17
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1999, PRIRUCNIK UPITNIK AN
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, Power calculator for continuous outcome non-inferiority trial
  • [3] Development and preliminary user testing of the DCIDA (Dynamic computer interactive decision application) for 'nudging' patients towards high quality decisions
    Bansback, Nick
    Li, Linda C.
    Lynd, Larry
    Bryan, Stirling
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2014, 14
  • [4] DECIDE: a Decision Support Tool to Facilitate Parents' Choices Regarding Genome-Wide Sequencing
    Birch, Patricia
    Adam, S.
    Bansback, N.
    Coe, R. R.
    Hicklin, J.
    Lehman, A.
    Li, K. C.
    Friedman, J. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2016, 25 (06) : 1298 - 1308
  • [5] Recommendations for the integration of genomics into clinical practice
    Bowdin, Sarah
    Gilbert, Adel
    Bedoukian, Emma
    Carew, Christopher
    Adam, Margaret P.
    Belmont, John
    Bernhardt, Barbara
    Biesecker, Leslie
    Bjornsson, Hans T.
    Blitzer, Miriam
    D'Alessandro, Lisa C. A.
    Deardorff, Matthew A.
    Demmer, Laurie
    Elliott, Alison
    Feldman, Gerald L.
    Glass, Ian A.
    Herman, Gail
    Hindorff, Lucia
    Hisama, Fuki
    Hudgins, Louanne
    Innes, A. Micheil
    Jackson, Laird
    Jarvik, Gail
    Kim, Raymond
    Korf, Bruce
    Ledbetter, David H.
    Li, Mindy
    Liston, Eriskay
    Marshall, Christian
    Medne, Livija
    Meyn, M. Stephen
    Monfared, Nasim
    Morton, Cynthia
    Mulvihill, John J.
    Plon, Sharon E.
    Rehm, Heidi
    Roberts, Amy
    Shuman, Cheryl
    Spinner, Nancy B.
    Stavropoulos, D. James
    Valverde, Kathleen
    Waggoner, Darrel J.
    Wilkens, Alisha
    Cohn, Ronald D.
    Krantz, Ian D.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 18 (11) : 1075 - 1084
  • [6] The clinical application of genome-wide sequencing for monogenic diseases in Canada: Position Statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists
    Boycott, Kym
    Hartley, Taila
    Adam, Shelin
    Bernier, Francois
    Chong, Karen
    Fernandez, Bridget A.
    Friedman, Jan M.
    Geraghty, Michael T.
    Hume, Stacey
    Knoppers, Bartha M.
    Laberge, Anne-Marie
    Majewski, Jacek
    Mendoza-Londono, Roberto
    Meyn, M. Stephen
    Michaud, Jacques L.
    Nelson, Tanya N.
    Richer, Julie
    Sadikovic, Bekim
    Skidmore, David L.
    Stockley, Tracy
    Taylor, Sherry
    van Karnebeek, Clara
    Zawati, Ma'n H.
    Lauzon, Julie
    Armour, Christine M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2015, 52 (07) : 431 - 437
  • [7] Validation of a decision regret scale
    Brehaut, JC
    O'Connor, AM
    Wood, TJ
    Hack, TF
    Siminoff, L
    Gordon, E
    Feldman-Stewart, D
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 23 (04) : 281 - 292
  • [8] Whole-Genome Sequencing: The New Standard of Care?
    Brunham, Liam R.
    Hayden, Michael R.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2012, 336 (6085) : 1112 - 1113
  • [9] A Framework for Unrestricted Prenatal Whole-Genome Sequencing: Respecting and Enhancing the Autonomy of Prospective Parents
    Chen, Stephanie C.
    Wasserman, David T.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2017, 17 (01) : 3 - 18
  • [10] A systematic development process for patient decision aids
    Coulter, Angela
    Stilwell, Diana
    Kryworuchko, Jennifer
    Mullen, Patricia Dolan
    Ng, Chirk Jenn
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 13