Breast percent density estimation from 3D reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis images

被引:6
作者
Bakic, Predrag R. [1 ]
Kontos, Despina [1 ]
Carton, Ann-Katherine [1 ]
Maidment, Andrew D. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1-3 | 2008年 / 6913卷
关键词
imaging of the breast; tomosynthesis; algorithms;
D O I
10.1117/12.773890
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Breast density is an independent factor of breast cancer risk. In mammograms breast density is quantitatively measured as percent density (PD), the percentage of dense (non-fatty) tissue. To date, clinical estimates of PD have varied significantly, in part due to the projective nature of mammography. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a 3D imaging modality in which cross-sectional images are reconstructed from a small number of projections acquired at different x-ray tube angles. Preliminary studies suggest that DBT is superior to mammography in tissue visualization, since superimposed anatomical structures present in mammograms are-filtered out. We hypothesize that DBT could also provide a more accurate breast density estimation. In this paper, we propose to estimate PD from reconstructed DBT images using a semi-automated thresholding technique. Preprocessing is performed to exclude the image background and the area of the pectoral muscle. Threshold values are selected manually from a small number of reconstructed slices; a combination of these thresholds is applied to each slice throughout the entire reconstructed DBT volume. The proposed method was validated using images of women with recently detected abnormalities or with biopsy-proven cancers; only contralateral breasts were analyzed. The Pearson correlation and kappa coefficients between the breast density estimates from DBT and the corresponding digital mammogram indicate moderate agreement between the two modalities, comparable with our previous results from 2D DBT projections. Percent density appears to be a robust measure for breast density assessment in both 2D and 3D x-ray breast imaging modalities using thresholding.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
BAKIC PR, 2007, MED IM COMP AID DIAG
[2]  
Boyd N F, 2001, IARC Sci Publ, V154, P163
[3]   THE QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITIES [J].
BYNG, JW ;
BOYD, NF ;
FISHELL, E ;
JONG, RA ;
YAFFE, MJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (10) :1629-1638
[4]   Prenatal and perinatal correlates of adult mammographic breast density [J].
Cerhan, JR ;
Sellers, TA ;
Janney, CA ;
Pankratz, VS ;
Brandt, KR ;
Vachon, CM .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2005, 14 (06) :1502-1508
[5]   Percentage density, Wolfe's and Tabar's mammographic patterns: agreement and association with risk factors for breast cancer [J].
Gram, IT ;
Bremnes, Y ;
Ursin, G ;
Maskarinec, G ;
Bjurstam, N ;
Lund, E .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 7 (05) :R854-R861
[6]   Mammographic density does not correlate with Ki-67 expression or cytomorphology in benign breast cells obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration from women at high risk for breast cancer [J].
Khan, Qamar J. ;
Kimler, Bruce F. ;
O'Dea, Anne P. ;
Zalles, Carola M. ;
Sharma, Priyanka ;
Fabian, Carol J. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 9 (03)
[7]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[8]   Mammographic density - Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence [J].
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Boyd, Norman F. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (01)
[9]   CLASSIFICATION OF BREAST-TISSUE BY TEXTURE ANALYSIS [J].
MILLER, P ;
ASTLEY, S .
IMAGE AND VISION COMPUTING, 1992, 10 (05) :277-282
[10]   Digital Tomosynthesis in breast imaging [J].
Niklason, LT ;
Christian, BT ;
Niklason, LE ;
Kopans, DB ;
Castleberry, DE ;
OpsahlOng, BH ;
Landberg, CE ;
Slanetz, PJ ;
Giardino, AA ;
Moore, R ;
Albagli, D ;
DeJule, MC ;
Fitzgerald, PF ;
Fobare, DF ;
Giambattista, BW ;
Kwasnick, RF ;
Liu, JQ ;
Lubowski, SJ ;
Possin, GE ;
Richotte, JF ;
Wei, CY ;
Wirth, RF .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 (02) :399-406