American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria permanent source brachytherapy for prostate cancer

被引:24
|
作者
Frank, Steven J. [1 ]
Arterbery, V. Elayne [2 ]
Hsu, I-Chow Joe [3 ]
Abdel-Wahab, May [4 ]
Ciezki, Jay P. [5 ]
Hahn, Noah M. [6 ]
Mohler, James Lloyd [7 ]
Moran, Brian J. [8 ]
Rosenthal, Seth A. [9 ]
Rossi, Carl J. [10 ]
Yamada, Yoshiya [11 ]
Merrick, Gregory [12 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Unit 97, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Crittenton DMC Hlth Serv, Rochester Hills, MI USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiat Oncol, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ Miami, Dept Radiat Oncol, Miami, FL USA
[5] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Radiat Oncol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[6] Indiana Univ Melvin & Bren Simon Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Amer Soc Clin Oncol, Indianapolis, IN USA
[7] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Amer Urol Assoc, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[8] Chicago Prostate Canc Ctr, Westmont, IL USA
[9] Radiol Associates Sacramento, Sacramento, CA USA
[10] Loma Linda Univ, Med Ctr, Loma Linda, CA USA
[11] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
[12] Schiffler Canc Ctr, Wheeling, NV USA
关键词
Appropriateness criteria; Brachytherapy; Radiation therapy; Prostate cancer; Quality of life; Standard of care; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIATION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RADIOACTIVE SEED IMPLANTATION; INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION; PATIENT SELECTION; FREE SURVIVAL; THERAPY; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.brachy.2011.01.014
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: Permanent prostate brachytherapy has emerged as a standard of care treatment for approximately 50,000 men annually who present with clinically localized prostate cancer. The purpose of this review was to provide clarification on the appropriateness criteria and management considerations for the treatment of prostate cancer with permanent prostate brachytherapy. METHODS: Panel members with expertise on prostate cancer were assembled and provided several clinical scenarios for consensus treatment and management guidelines. Prostate cancer patient vignettes were presented along with specific management recommendations based on an extensive review of the modern brachytherapy literature. The brachytherapy topic development and review consists of two parts which require extensive participation by the expert panel. The American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria (AC) are derived from a multidisciplinary panel of experts from both the academic and private practice settings. The first activity is a review of the current literature with development of an evidence table, referenced narrative, and ratings table of treatments. The second activity is the consensus-building process using a modified Delphi technique via an anonymous voting process. RESULTS: Most brachytherapy series have demonstrated favorable morbidity profiles and durable biochemical control rates for patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk features. However, as brachytherapy followups have matured, it has become increasingly apparent that efficacy and morbidity are highly dependent on implant quality. CONCLUSION: Continued attempts to refine patient selection, brachytherapy treatment planning philosophy, technique, and postimplant management should result in further improvements in biochemical outcome and decreased brachytherapy-related morbidity. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 362
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ACR appropriateness criteria: Permanent source brachytherapy for prostate cancer
    Davis, Brian J.
    Taira, Al V.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Assimos, Dean G.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    Gottschalk, Alexander R.
    Gustafson, Gary S.
    Keole, Sameer R.
    Liauw, Stanley L.
    Lloyd, Shane
    McLaughlin, Patrick W.
    Movsas, Benjamin
    Prestidge, Bradley R.
    Showalter, Timothy N.
    Vapiwala, Neha
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2017, 16 (02) : 266 - 276
  • [2] The American College of Radiology and the American Brachytherapy Society practice parameter for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer
    Bittner, Nathan H. J.
    Orio, Peter F., III
    Merrick, Gregory S.
    Prestidge, Bradley R.
    Hartford, Alan Charles
    Rosenthal, Seth A.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2017, 16 (01) : 59 - 67
  • [3] American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria
    Beitler, Jonathan J.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 47 (07) : 553 - 553
  • [4] American college of radiology appropriateness criteria
    Griffiths, HJ
    Maki, DD
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 1996, 16 (01) : 62 - 62
  • [5] American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria
    Merrick, Gregory S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2011, 34 (01): : 1 - 1
  • [6] American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria for Infertility
    Gangadhar, Kiran
    Dighe, Manjiri K.
    ULTRASOUND QUARTERLY, 2015, 31 (04) : 283 - 284
  • [7] Commentary on American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria
    Dubinsky, Theodore J.
    Dighe, Manjiri
    ULTRASOUND QUARTERLY, 2012, 28 (02) : 157 - 158
  • [8] The American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria - Will they be useful for us?
    Bode, FR
    Cascade, PN
    CHEST, 1996, 110 (04) : 869 - 871
  • [9] How Appropriate Are the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria for Ovarian Cancer Screening
    Dubinsky, Theodore J.
    ULTRASOUND QUARTERLY, 2010, 26 (04) : 225 - 226
  • [10] American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria and Standards: Separate programs
    Berlin, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (03) : 811 - 812