What are women's mode of birth preferences and why? A systematic scoping review

被引:47
作者
Coates, Dominiek [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thirukumar, Purshaiyna [2 ]
Spear, Virginia [4 ]
Brown, Georgia [1 ]
Henry, Amanda [2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Hlth, Ctr Midwifery & Child & Family Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] UNSW, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, UNSW Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Sydney Partnership Hlth Educ Res & Enterprise SPH, Maridulu Budyari Gumal, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] South Eastern Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Royal Hosp Women, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] St George Hosp, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] UNSW Med, George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Caesarean section; Mode of birth preferences; Shared decision-making; Childbirth fear; Vaginal birth; PREVIOUS CESAREAN-SECTION; DECISION-MAKING; MATERNAL REQUEST; VAGINAL DELIVERY; PREGNANT-WOMEN; MEDICAL INDICATIONS; CHILDBIRTH FEAR; CHOICE; PERCEPTION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.wombi.2019.09.005
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: The optimal caesarean section rate is estimated to be between 10-15%; however, it is much higher in high and many middle-income countries and continues to be lower in some middle and low-income countries. While a range of factors influence caesarean section rates, women's mode of birth preferences also play a role. The aim of this study was to map the literature in relation to women's mode of birth preferences, and identify underlying reasons for, and factors associated with, these preferences. Method: Using a scoping review methodology, quantitative and qualitative evidence was systematically considered. To identify studies, PubMed, Maternity and Infant Care, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched for the period from 2008 to 2018, and reference lists of included studies were examined. Findings: A total of 65 studies were included. While the majority of women prefer a vaginal birth, between 5-20% in high-income countries and 1.4 to 50% in low-middle-income countries prefer a caesarean section. The six main reasons or factors associated with a mode of birth preference were: (1) perceptions of safety; (2) fear of pain; (3) previous birth experience; (4) encouragement and dissuasion from health professionals; (5) social and cultural influences; and (6) access to information and educational levels. Conclusion: To help ensure women receive the required care that is aligned with their preferences, processes of shared decision-making should be implemented. Shared decision-making has the potential to reduce the rate of unnecessary interventions, and also improve the willingness of women to accept a medically-indicated caesarean section in low-income countries. (C) 2019 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 333
页数:11
相关论文
共 129 条
  • [31] Decision aid tools to support women's decision making in pregnancy and birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dugas, Marylene
    Shorten, Allison
    Dube, Eric
    Wassef, Maggy
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    Chaillet, Nils
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2012, 74 (12) : 1968 - 1978
  • [32] Do Interventions Designed to Support Shared Decision-Making Reduce Health Inequalities? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    Carpenter, Lewis
    Dolan, Hayley
    Bravo, Paulina
    Mann, Mala
    Bunn, Frances
    Elwyn, Glyn
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (04):
  • [33] Why women request cesarean section without medical indication?
    Dursun, Polat
    Yanik, Filiz B.
    Zeyneloglu, Hulusi B.
    Baser, Eralp
    Kuscu, Esra
    Ayhan, Ali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2011, 24 (09) : 1133 - 1137
  • [34] Women's antenatal preferences for delivery route in a setting with high cesarean section rates and a medically dominated maternity system
    Dweik, Diana
    Girasek, Edmond
    Toereki, Annamaria
    Meszaros, Gyula
    Pal, Attila
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2014, 93 (04) : 408 - 415
  • [35] Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Frosch, Dominick
    Thomson, Richard
    Joseph-Williams, Natalie
    Lloyd, Amy
    Kinnersley, Paul
    Cording, Emma
    Tomson, Dave
    Dodd, Carole
    Rollnick, Stephen
    Edwards, Adrian
    Barry, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (10) : 1361 - 1367
  • [36] Preferences for mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: what do women want, what do they get and how do they value outcomes?
    Emmett, Clare L.
    Montgomery, Alan A.
    Murphy, Deirdre J.
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2011, 14 (04) : 397 - 404
  • [37] Perception and attitude of women with previous caesarean section towards repeat caesarean delivery
    Enabudoso, Ehigha Jude
    Ezeanochie, Michael Chudi
    Olagbuji, Biodun Nelson
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2011, 24 (10) : 1212 - 1214
  • [38] Why do primigravidae request caesarean section in a normal pregnancy? A qualitative study in Iran
    Faisal, I.
    Matinnia, N.
    Hejar, A. R.
    Khodakarami, Z.
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2014, 30 (02) : 227 - 233
  • [39] Improving psychoeducation for women fearful of childbirth: Evaluation of a research translation project
    Fenwick, Jennifer
    Toohill, Jocelyn
    Slavin, Valerie
    Creedy, Debra K.
    Gamble, Jenny
    [J]. WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2018, 31 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [40] Effects of a midwife psycho-education intervention to reduce childbirth fear on women's birth outcomes and postpartum psychological wellbeing
    Fenwick, Jennifer
    Toohill, Jocelyn
    Gamble, Jenny
    Creedy, Debra K.
    Buist, Anne
    Turkstra, Erika
    Sneddon, Anne
    Scuffham, Paul A.
    Ryding, Elsa L.
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2015, 15